%0 Journal Article %T MAKING DISTINCTION TO ANALYTICAL AREAS ON DEVELOPMENT: SEVEN ANALYTICAL AREAS IN ANSWERING TO WHY HAVE COUNTRIES BEEN DEVELOPED %J POLITICAL QUARTERLY %I %Z 1735-9678 %A Attar, Saeed %D 2014 %\ 09/23/2014 %V 44 %N 3 %P 527-546 %! MAKING DISTINCTION TO ANALYTICAL AREAS ON DEVELOPMENT: SEVEN ANALYTICAL AREAS IN ANSWERING TO WHY HAVE COUNTRIES BEEN DEVELOPED %K analytical areas on development %K Civil society %K family %K Individual %K international system %K Market %K political society %K state %R 10.22059/jpq.2014.53362 %X “What is cause/barrier of underdeveloped countries to achieve developmentaccording to a model of modern industrial society?” For answering to this question,which is one of the most famous questions of social scientist for several decades,classifying theories about development/underdevelopment is necessary. Classifyinghelp us to understanding them. This paper tries to classify theories of developmentby dividing all of the analytical area in issue of development/ underdevelopment.For this perspective, most theories of development are classified in seven areas:individual, family, market, civil society, political society, state, international systemareas. For “Individual Change and becoming Modern” Alex Inkeles (Individual asdevelopment agent) to contemporary underdevelopment is in large part thehistorical product of relations between the satellite underdeveloped and the nowdeveloped metropolitan countries Andre Gunder Frank (international system asdevelopment/ underdevelopment agent). All of them can be classified in theseseven analytical areas. %U https://jpq.ut.ac.ir/article_53362_4b9bab992b714ccb6344f7fb6567d32f.pdf