<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>POLITICAL QUARTERLY</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-9678</Issn>
				<Volume>40</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT: FROM POLITICAL TO LEGAL CLAIM</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT: FROM POLITICAL TO LEGAL CLAIM</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>315</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>334</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">29642</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Yousef</FirstName>
					<LastName>Molaii</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>There is no consensus of opinion and ambiguity on the meaning of &quot;The Right to Development&quot;. There are several different views and opinions on this right and this difference of opinion has prevented its implementation. Therefore it seems that &quot;The Right to Development is more of a political claim than a legal one.    
There is no consensus of opinion and ambiguity on the meaning of &quot;The Right to Development&quot;. There are several different views and opinions on this right and this difference of opinion has prevented its implementation. Therefore it seems that &quot;The Right to Development is more of a political claim than a legal one.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">There is no consensus of opinion and ambiguity on the meaning of &quot;The Right to Development&quot;. There are several different views and opinions on this right and this difference of opinion has prevented its implementation. Therefore it seems that &quot;The Right to Development is more of a political claim than a legal one.    
There is no consensus of opinion and ambiguity on the meaning of &quot;The Right to Development&quot;. There are several different views and opinions on this right and this difference of opinion has prevented its implementation. Therefore it seems that &quot;The Right to Development is more of a political claim than a legal one.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">claim of the developing countries. The nature of  Right to development</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Collective Rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">East</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Human Right in practice</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Interdependence of Right</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rhetoric and Reality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Solidarity Right</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">West debate</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jpq.ut.ac.ir/article_29642_205b8a5218d0306da4b234dc41d25272.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
