The impact of good governance on the development of science and technology: a case study of Singapore

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 M.A in Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran..

Abstract

Introduction
This article examines the impact of good governance on the development of science and technology in Singapore, emphasizing indicators such as rule of law, transparency, accountability, government effectiveness, political stability, and corruption control. The theoretical framework is built upon the concept of good governance, as described by the World Bank and further developed by economists like Joseph Stiglitz, which posits that effective governance structures are fundamental to fostering economic and technological advancement by creating an environment conducive to investment, innovation, and public trust. In Singapore, the rule of law plays a pivotal role in shaping an efficient legal framework that protects intellectual property rights, attracts foreign investments, and ensures a fair legal system for local and international businesses alike; establishing a trusted judicial system and providing regulatory clarity has positioned Singapore as a hub for international dispute resolution and a key location for companies seeking a secure environment for innovation. Corruption control is another critical factor, with Singapore’s rigorous anti-corruption measures, led by institutions such as the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), aiming to minimize corruption, create an equitable playing field for businesses, and encourage foreign direct investment in high-tech sectors; CPIB’s proactive strategies, including increased salaries for civil servants and strict enforcement of corruption laws, have contributed to a transparent system that appeals to investors and fosters economic stability. Political stability is also underscored as essential for sustainable scientific and technological growth; by maintaining a stable political environment through long-term governance by the ruling People’s Action Party, Singapore has cultivated a landscape that supports infrastructure investment and scientific research, with the stability and predictability of the political climate further boosting Singapore’s reputation and attracting multinational corporations and research institutions, particularly in sectors like biotechnology that require long-term investments in a reliable environment. Government effectiveness, a cornerstone of Singapore’s success, has been vital for implementing and sustaining good governance practices; the government has developed digital solutions and streamlined processes, such as the efficient startup registration process that takes just over a day, significantly faster than regional averages, while also investing extensively in digital skills, research support, and technological advancement to create a business-friendly environment aligned with Singapore’s ambition to be a global innovation hub. Transparency and accountability are further emphasized as key elements, as Singapore’s high level of transparency—exhibited through initiatives like SingPass, a government digital service platform—makes information readily accessible, reduces bureaucratic delays, and limits opportunities for corruption, thereby enhancing public trust and enabling a faster pace of innovation by reducing regulatory burdens on entrepreneurs and innovators. The theoretical framework situates Singapore’s approach within a broader global context, suggesting that good governance can serve as a catalyst for science and technology development in developing nations; the article argues that implementing reforms such as strengthening the rule of law, reducing corruption, and improving government effectiveness can lay the groundwork for sustainable growth and innovation, especially when coupled with a collaborative approach involving government, private sector, and academic institutions to amplify these impacts. In conclusion, the article highlights Singapore as a model of good governance that leverages its governance indicators to foster scientific and technological growth—through robust legal frameworks, anti-corruption measures, political stability, effective governance, and high transparency—resulting in significant economic and innovation gains; these practices could serve as a valuable framework for countries seeking to advance their science and technology sectors, and the article recommends that developing nations consider Singapore’s model as a benchmark and focus on policy reforms that integrate principles of good governance to build an innovation-driven economy.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

References
Achermann, K., & Besson, S. (2023). International cooperation under the human right to science:What and whose duties and responsibilities?.Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1273984.https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1273984
Anttiroiko, A. (2014). Good governance in context: Learning from anti-corruption policies of Finland and Singapore.
Blind, K., Petersen, S.S., & Riillo, C.A.F.(2017).The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets.Research Policy, 46, 249-264.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.003
Chalk, R.A. (1985). Overview:AAAS Project on secrecy and openness in science and technology.Science, Technology & Human Values, 10, 28-34.
Chia, S. (2017). Cities for citizens, by citizens:Public participation in urban planning. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore.
Duverger, C., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2011). Determinants of productivity growth:Science and technology policies and the contribution of R&D. ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic).
EDB Singapore. (n.d.). Business-friendly environment.Singapore Economic Development Board.Retrieved from https://www.edb.gov.sg/en/why-singapore/business-friendly-environment.html
Elman, C., Kapiszewski, D., & Lupia, A. (2018). Transparent social inquiry:Implications for political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 29–47.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-091515-025429
Enihe, R.O., & Lawal, T. (2021). Blockchain technology:A panacea for corruption in Nigerian government financial processes.International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science.
Environmental Regulations in the Mining Sector and Their Effect on Technological Innovation. (2021). DOI:10.1017/9781108904209.007.
Fox, J.(2010).The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability.Development in Practice, 20(6), 663-671.10.1080/ 09614520701469955.
Georgetown University School of Continuing Studies. (2016). Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Studies Program Electronic Thesis Release Form [PDF].Retrieved from Georgetown University website.
Gutmanis, I. (1990). On the advancement of science and technology among nations:The importance of government policies upon the development of advanced technology industries in five countries.
Hu, L., Chen, Z., & Chen, Z. (2021). Impact of artificial intelligence on economic development.Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies.
Javanmardi, S., Mousavi, T., & Iranpour Mobarakeh, R. (2019). Innovation and university:Reflections on the formation and development of innovative universities.Industry and University Journal, 39(11), 81-99. [In Persian]
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2007). Governance matters VI: Governance indicators for 1996-2006.World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No.4280. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=999979
Kołakowski, P., Gil, M., Wróbel, K., & Ho, Y.S. (2021). State of play in technology and legal framework of alternative marine fuels and renewable energy systems:A bibliometric analysis.Maritime Policy & Management, 49, 236-260.DOI:10.1080/03088839. 2021.1969460.
Koolaee, E., & Kiani, N. (2019). Economic development of Singapore based on the democratic developmental state model.Political Quarterly, 49(4), 1121-1140.doi:10.22059/jpq.2019.225585.1007007. [In Persian]
Kordi, A., & Khodaparast Mashhadi, M. (2016). The impact of corruption on foreign direct investment in developing countries.Financial Economics(Financial Economics and Development), 10(36), 33-50. [In Persian]
Leftwich, A. (2006). Developmental states:On the importance of politics in development(J.Afshar Kahan, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Negar Publishing. [In Persian]
Liu, C. (2021). Infrastructure public–private partnership (PPP) investment and government fiscal expenditure on science and technology from the perspective of sustainability. Sustainability.DOI:10.3390/su13116193.
Mauzy, D.K., & Milne, R.S. (2012). Singapore politics:Under the People's Action Party.Routledge.ISBN 0-415-24653-9.
Menon, S.V. (2007). Governing, leadership and economic growth in Singapore.ICFAI Business School, Ahmedabad.
Mirza Ebrahimi, R. (2006). Stiglitz's perspective on reforming government sectors. Quarterly Journal of Economy and Society,(7). [In Persian]
Molusti, P., & Holm, J.D. (1990). Developing democracy when civil society is weak: The case of Botswana.African Affairs, 89.
Mooney, C., & Farrier, D. (2002). A micro case study of the legal and administrative arrangements for river health in the Kangaroo River (NSW). Water Science and Technology:A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 45(11), 161–168.
Nairobi, N., & Amelia, N.F. (2022). Political stability, index perception of corruption and direct foreign investment in Southeast Asia.E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana.
Natai, P.C., & Namada, J.M. (2021). Influence of policy framework and technology on change management in selected telecommunication companies in Tanzania.DOI:10.4018/IJBSA.287109.
Ndemo, E.B. (2015). Political entrepreneurialism: Reflections of a civil servant on the role of political institutions in technology innovation and diffusion in Kenya.Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 4.
OECD. (2018). The future of innovation:Shaping the future of innovation for the digital economy.Paris, France: OECD.
Panigutti, C., Hamon, R., Hupont, I., Fernández Llorca, D., Fano Yela, D., Junklewitz, H., Scalzo, S., Mazzini, G., Sanchez, I., Soler Garrido, J., & Gómez, E. (2023). The role of explainable AI in the context of the AI Act.Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013. 3594069.
Pew Trusts. (2021). Why we must rebuild trust in science.Retrieved from www.pewtrusts.org
Refai, R., Sameti, M., Seyyed Salehi, S., & Refai, Z .(2017). Corruption control and foreign direct investment:Evidence from panel data.Strategic and Macro Policies, 5(19), 35-48. [In Persian]
Rout, S. (2018). Scientific development in India after independence and its impact on society: A critique on technological development for the public of India.
Rushing, F.W., & Brown, C.G. (1990). Intellectual property rights in science, technology, and economic performance: International comparisons.
Singapore, 50 years of science and technology. (2021). Lee Kuan Yew Institute, School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/gia/article/singapore-50-years-of-science-and-technology
Suciningtyas, S., & Suripto, S. (2021). Role of apparatus competence, organizational commitment, community participation, technology use, and transparency in fund management.Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science. DOI:10.55324/ijoms. v1i3. 40.
Sviderskyi, O., & Lubentsov, A. (2020). The impact of corruption on the development of legal and economic systems of state.Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 6, 125.
Tabatabaeian, S.H., & Atapour, M.R.(2014).A review of science and technology laws and regulations and their relation to innovation.Technology Growth, 10(40), 28-36. [In Persian]
Tan, K.P. (2007). Renaissance Singapore? Economy, culture, and politics.NUS Press.ISBN 978-9971-69-377-0.
Vertex Holdings (2021). Singapore's innovation ecosystem:Past, present and future. Retrieved from https://vertexholdings.com/news/singapore-s-innovation-ecosystem-past-present-and-future/
Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2017). Tax-based mechanisms:Technology development of Singapore and Thailand.
World Bank. (2023). Worldwide governance indicators.Washington, DC:World Bank Publications.doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1734-4
World Economic Forum. (2011). Global competitiveness report 2011/2012. Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_Report_2011-12.pdf
World Justice Project. (2022). Rule of law index 2022. Washington, DC:World Justice Project.
Xu, Y. (2021). The concept of the rule of law by wisdom is proved. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology, 3, 34-37.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/ jsoce.2021.030506
Xu, Z., & Feng, Z. (2019). The experience of rule of law in the innovation and development of science and technology in the United States and its enlightenment to the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.DOI:10.2991/icecsd-19. 2019.41.
Yeo, P.(2016).Chapter 3, Going beyond comparative advantage:How Singapore did it.In Breaking the oil spell.USA:International Monetary Fund.Retrieved August 20, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.5089/ 9781513537863.071.ch004
Yoon, D., & Szameitat, A. (2018). The effectiveness analysis for the education and training of research equipment in South Korea.Cogent Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1478514
Zhang, J. (2023). Assessing the impact of R&D investments, government subsidies on energy efficiency:Empirical analysis from the Chinese listed firms. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(2), 3606–3620.DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-22326-z.
POLITICAL QUARTERLY
Volume 55, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
September 2025
Pages 646-615

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 05 November 2024
  • Revise Date: 19 December 2024
  • Accept Date: 18 May 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics