SAUDI STRATEGIC POLICY MAKING; ENLARGEMENT OF THE MIDDLE EAST CRISIS AND GEOPOLITICAL CHAOS

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor; Political Sciences Department, University of Tehran

2 Master; Callege of Farabi, University of Theran

Abstract

Saudi strategic policy-making depends on the regional role, the characteristics of political leaders and the direction of the structure of the international system. The role of Saudi security during the Salman era can be seen as the continuation of the power policy for regional hegemony. Such an approach, the behavioral patterns in the era of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. Donald Trump's coming to power and US military contracts with Saudi Arabia have increased the role of the country in the future of regional security. The regional role of Saudi Arabia is defined on the basis of signs such as the expansion of the geopolitical crisis. Such a situation would be the transition from the United States regional equilibrium policy. The structure of the international system faces geopolitical changes in the post-Cold War years. Regional developments in the Middle East geopolitical suggest that Saudi-based strategic policy framework chaos making actors and forces has been created. New geopolitical realities of the world emphasized that the Middle East conflict is the center of regional crises management. Increase in military spending in Saudi Arabia is based on the signs of crisis making and threats. Saudi Arabia's agents in the regional coalition are seeking to adopt mechanisms such as crisis expansion as crisis management tools and techniques. The formation of "proxy wars" and of "asymmetric conflicts" may be among the causes and symptoms of geopolitical crisis in the Middle East. The new security crisis not only affects the relationships of regional actors, but also has the capabilities needed to change the geopolitics of the Middle East. The main question is that: "what is the main index of Saudi Strategy in the Middle East security environment in the second decade of the 21st century?" The hypothesis mentioned that: "the mechanisms of Saudi Arabia are based on militarism, escalating the crisis and proxy war in the Middle East geopolitical crisis. For explaining this paper to “identity structure approach” is used. The methodology of the paper will be based on "data analysis" and "content analysis".

Keywords


  1. الف) فارسی

    1. اسنایدر، گریک (1384). امنیت و استراتژی معاصر، ترجمۀ حسین محمدی نجم، تهران: دانشکده فرماندهی و ستاد سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی.
    2. رشید، مضاوی (1393). عربستان سعودی و جریانهای اسلامی جدید، ترجمۀ رضا نجف‌زاده، تهران: پژوهشگاه فرهنگ، هنر و ارتباطات وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی.
    3. فولر، گراهام (1373). قبلۀ عالم؛ ژئوپلیتیک ایران، ترجمۀ عباس مخبر، تهران: نشر مرکز.
    4. کاستلز، مانوئل (1380). عصر اطلاعات: قدرت هویت،  ترجمۀ حسن چاوشیان، تهران: طرح نو.
    5. کالاهان، پاتریک (1387). منطق سیاست خارجی امریکا، ترجمۀ داوود غرایاق زندی و دیگران، تهران: پژوهشکدۀ مطالعات راهبردی.
    6. کوهن، سائول (1387). ژئوپلیتیک نظام جهانی، ترجمة عباس کاردان، تهران: ابرار معاصر.
    7. کیوان‌حسینی، اصغر (1384). «جایگاه سیاست تغییر رژیم در رویکرد امنیتی امریکا»، فصلنامۀ سیاست دفاعی، ش 50، سال سیزدهم، تابستان.
    8. مشیرزاده، حمیرا (1384). تحول در نظریات روابط بین‌الملل، تهران: سمت.
    9. هالستی، کی‌جی (1373). «مبانی تحلیل سیاست بینالملل»، ترجمۀ مسعود طارم‌سری و بهرام مستقیمی، تهران: دفتر مطالعات سیاسی و بین‌المللی وزارت امور خارجه.
    10. والت، استفان (1382). عدم توازن جهانی: خویشتن­داری و سیاست خارجی امریکا، ترجمۀ عظیم فضلی­پور، مندرج در تنها ابرقدرت، تهران: ابرار معاصر.
    11. والتز، کنث (1382). واقع­گرایی ساختاری پس از جنگ سرد، تهران: ابرار معاصر.

     

    ب) خارجی

    1. Ahmed Ali (2013). Al Qaeda in Iraq and the Iraqi Anti- Government Protest Movement, Washington: Institute for the Study of War.
    2. Arango, Tim and Kareem Fahim (2014), Iraq Again Uses Sunni Tribesmen in Militant War, New York Times, January 20,
    3. Arraf, Jane (2014). Iraq’s Sunni tribal leaders say fight for Fallujah is part of a revolution, Washington Post, March 12.
    4. Blattman, Christopher & Edward Miguel, (2010), “Civil War,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 3-57.
    5. Brennan, Rick, (2014) “Withdrawal Symptoms,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 93, No. 6, November/December.
    6. Brzezinski, Zbigniew (1993). Out of Control: Global Turmoil on the Eve of the 21th Century, New York: Macmillan press.
    7. Cederman, Lars-Erik, Andreas Wimmer and Brian Min, (2010). “Why Do Ethnic Groups Rebel? New Data and Analysis”, World Politics, Vol. 62, no. 1, January.
    8. Ghazi, Yasr & Tim Arango (2014). Qaeda-Aligned Militants Threaten Key Iraqi Cities, New York Times, January 2.
    9. Hildreth, steven (2009). Iran's Ballistic Missile Programs: An Overview, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, February 4.
    10. Kagan, Robert (2004). Of Paradise and Power: America versus Europe in the New World Order, knopf.
    11. Kaplan, Robert (2000), “The Coming Anarchy: Shattering the Dreams of the Cold War”, New York: Random House.
    12. Katzman, Kenneth (2010). Iran-Iraq Relations, Congressional Research Service, August 13.
    13. Katzman, Kenneth (2013). Iraq: Politics, Governance, and Human Rights, Congressional Research Service.
    14. 25.     Kohen, Arnold, Peter Prove and Lawrence J. Korb, “Arms Spending Instead of Basic Aid”, International Herald Tribune, 22 Aug. 2002.
    15. Lukacs, John (1993). “The End of the 20 Century and end of Modern Age”, New York: Ticknor and Fields Press.
    16. 27.     Perito, Robert (2002). “The American Experience with Police in Peacekeeping Operation”, Clements port: Canadian Peacekeeping Press
    17. 28.     Pollack, Kenneth (2006). Grand Strategy: Why American should Promote a New Liberal Order in the Middle East Blueprint Magazine, July 22.
    18. Pollack, Kenneth M., (2014). “An Army to Defeat Assad: How to Turn Syria’s Opposition Into a Real Fighting Force,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 93, no. 5 September/October, pp. 110-124.
    19. Schmits, Charles (2011). Yemens' Tribal Show down, Foreign affairs.com/articles/67877/charles-schmitz/yemens-tribal-showdown.
    20. Weitz, Richard (2010). The limits of Partnership: China, NATO and the Afghan War, China Security, Fall.
    21. Whiteside, Craig, (2015). ISIL’s Small Ball Warfare: An Effective Way to Get Back into a Ballgame,War on the Rocks, April 29.
    22. Yaffe, Michael (2004). “The Gulf and a New Middle East Security system”, Middle East Policy, Vol. 4, No 3 , Fall.