The present article aims to investigate the essence of the first Pahlavi State given its institutional legacy for the next periods. Although the first Pahlavi state approaches a modernizing authoritarian state model in terms of deployment model and modernization functions, however, our understanding of the essence of this state would be incomplete if extended formation of state monarchy and its institutional results are left unnoticed. The extended monarchy model caused the aforementioned state to witness, in a clearly declining trend, the revival and reproduction of the Iranian Traditional Monarchy characteristics in the new state and fading away of other features of the former state under the influence of dominant traditional monarchy characteristics.
میگدال، جوئل (1395). دولت در جامعه، ترجمۀ محمدتقی دلفروز، تهران: کویر.
نقیبزاده، احمد (1378). رضاشاه و نظام ایلی در ایران، تهران: مرکز اسناد انقلاب اسلامی.
نورث، داگلاس و همکاران (1396). خشونت و نظمهای اجتماعی، ترجمۀ جعفرخیرخواهان و رضا مجیدزاده، تهران: روزنه.
وبر، ماکس (1393). اقتصاد و جامعه، ترجمۀ عباس منوچهری و همکاران، تهران: سمت.
هالیدی، فرد (1358). دیکتاتوری و توسعه سرمایهداری در ایران، ترجمۀ فضلالله نیکآیین، تهران: امیرکبیر.
هانتینگتون، ساموئل (1375). سامان سیاسی در جوامع دستخوش دگرگونی، ترجمۀ محسن ثلاثی، تهران: علم.
ب) انگلیسی
Akhavi,Shahrokh (1980). religion and politics in contemporary Iran: Clergy-state relations in Pahlavi period. New York.
Azimi,Fakhreddin (2008). The quest for democracy in Iran: a century of struggle against authoritarian rule. Harvard University Press.
Bananai ,Amin (1961).The Modernization of Iran, 1921-1941. Stanford University
Bratton,Michael and Nicolas van de Walle(1994). “Neopatrimonial Regimes and Post Colonial Transitions in Africa”, World Politics, Vol. 46, No. 4, ,
Cronin,Stephanie (2006). Tribal politics in Iran: rural conflict and the new state (1921–1941). London. Routledge.
Curtis ,Michael (2009). Orientalism and Islam: European Thinkers on Oriental Despotism in the Middle East and India. Cambridge University Press
Eisenstadt,S N (1973). Traditional Patrimonialism and Modern Neopatrimonialism. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Eisenberg,Andrew (1998). “Weberian patrimonialism and imperial Chinese history”. Theory and Society 27 (1)
İnalcik, Halil (1992). “Comments on Sultanism: Max Weber’s Typification of theOttoman Polity”. Princeton Papers in Near Eastern Studies 1
Joseph, Richard A (1987). Democracy and Prebendal Politics in Nigeria: The Rise and Fall of the Second Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Linz ,Juan J and Alfred Stepan (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation. Johns Hopkins University Press
Matthee,Rudi (1999). The Politics of Trade in Safavid Iran: Silk for Silver, 1600-1730. Cambridge University Press
Mann ,Michael (1992). States, War, and Capitalism: Studies in Political Sociology. Blackwell
Mann ,Michael (1986). The Sources of Social Power. Volume 1. A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge University Press
O'Donnel,GuIlermo.(1996). “Illusions About Consolidation”. Journal of Democracy, Vol. 7, No. 2, April
Peters,Guy (2002). The politics of bureaucracy. London.Routledge.
Pollard, Elizabeth (2015). Worlds Together, Worlds Apart. vol. 1. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc
Roth,Guenther (1968). “Personal Rulership, Patrimonialism, and Empire-Building in the New States”. World Politics,Vol. 20, No. 2 ,Jan.
Sandbrook, Richard (1985). The Politics of Africa’s Economic Stagnation. Cambridge
Sheikholeslami,Reza (1987). “The patrimonial Structure of Iranian Bureacracy in the late nineteenth century”. iranian Studies. Vol XI.
Theobald, Robin (1982). “Patrimonialism”, World Politics, Vol. 34, No. 4, July.
Therkildsen ,Ole (2005). Understanding Public Management through Neopatrimonialism: A Paradigm for all African Seasons?, In: Engel, Ulf; Olsen, Gorm Rye, (eds.), The African Exception. London: Ashgate.
Kazemi, H. (2018). INSTITUTIONAL MODERNIZATION IN RADITIONAL MONARCHIES AND THE FORMATION OF A NEO-PATRIMONIAL REGIME:THE EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRST PAHLAVI. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 48(2), 433-452. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2018.227346.1007014
MLA
Hojjat Kazemi. "INSTITUTIONAL MODERNIZATION IN RADITIONAL MONARCHIES AND THE FORMATION OF A NEO-PATRIMONIAL REGIME:THE EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRST PAHLAVI", POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 48, 2, 2018, 433-452. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2018.227346.1007014
HARVARD
Kazemi, H. (2018). 'INSTITUTIONAL MODERNIZATION IN RADITIONAL MONARCHIES AND THE FORMATION OF A NEO-PATRIMONIAL REGIME:THE EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRST PAHLAVI', POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 48(2), pp. 433-452. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2018.227346.1007014
VANCOUVER
Kazemi, H. INSTITUTIONAL MODERNIZATION IN RADITIONAL MONARCHIES AND THE FORMATION OF A NEO-PATRIMONIAL REGIME:THE EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRST PAHLAVI. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2018; 48(2): 433-452. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2018.227346.1007014