Of the important indicators in identifying power dynamics in the East Asian region is the recognition of the situation of “power transition”, namely, the status of Asia in becoming the center of world politics. The purpose of this article is explanation of how the rise of the very new power dynamic is impending in East Asia by assessing two rival theoretical approaches of “balance of power” and “power transition”. Data show more explanatory strength of the latter in comparison to the previous. The innovation of the paper is that that in spite of explanatory strength of “transition power”, traditional understanding of transition power theory is incapable of explaining today's complex international system. So, it requires revision in its concepts and components to make it consistent with today’s international system and region. According to this, the hypothesis of the paper is that complexity and a nonlinear character prevailing in the international system has led to bifurcation of transition in today’s system, as if it was shaping Dual hierarchical order with US leadership in security and China in economy in East Asia. Given this, the methodology of the article is inductive-deductive which involves using theory and quantitative methods in assessing the application of the theory based on the World Bank, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and the Stockholm Institute for the Study of Peace (SIPRI) databases.
محروق، فاطمه (1394). «اقتصاد سیاسی تروریسم: مورد داعش»، فصلنامۀ روابط خارجی، سال هفتم، ش چهارم، ص152-119.
محروق، فاطمه (1396). «نشست کمربند و جاده: مسیر دشوار چین در تحقق همکاری اقتصادی بینالملل»، گزارش راهبردی معاونت پژوهشهای سیاست خارجی مرکز تحقیقات استراتژیک، ش 297، ص 8-1.
Abdollahian, M. & Kang, K. (2008). “in Search of Structure: The Nonlinear Dynamics of Power Transitions", International Interactions, 34:4, 333-357.
Beeson, M. (2009). “Hegemonic Transition in East Asia? The Dynamics of Chinese and American Power”, Review of International Studies, 35, 1.
Beeson, M. (2009). “Hegemonic transition in East Asia? The dynamics of Chinese and American Power”, Review of International Studies, 35, pp. 95–112.
Clowes, D. & Choroś-Mrozowska, D. (2015). “Aspects of global security-the measurement of power & its projection. Research from twenty selected countries (2000-2013)”, Journal of International Studies, 8, 1, pp. 53-66.
Cudworth, E. & Hobden, S. (2010). “Anarchy and Anarchism: Towards at Theory of Complex International Systems”, Journal of International Studies, 39, 2, pp. 399-416.
DiCicco J., Levy J (2003). “Power transition research program, a lakatosian analysis”, in Progress in International Relations Theory, by Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman, MIT Press. and problem shifts. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43, 6, pp. 675–704 .
Fravel, M. (2011)” China’s Strategy in the South China Sea”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 33, 3, pp. 292–319.
Hwan Lee, S. (2015) “Global and Regional Orders in the 21st Century in Terms of Multi-Layered Power Transition Theory: The Cases of US-China and China-Japan Relations”, International Area Studies Review,18, 3.
Ikenberry J. (2014). “The illusion of geopolitics: The enduring power of the liberal order”, Foreign Affairs, 93, 3, pp. 80–90.
Jackson, V. (2014) “power, trust and network complexity, three logics and hedging in Asian security”, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 14, 331-356.
Katzenstein, P. (2005). AWorldofRegions:AsiaandEuropeintheAmericanImperium, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.
Kim W. (1991). “Alliance transitions and great power war”. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 4, pp. 833–850
Kim W. (1992) “Power transitions and great power war from Westphalia to Waterloo”, World Politics, 45, 1, pp. 153–172.
Kim W (1996). Power parity, alliance, and war from 1648 to 1975, In: Kugler J, Lemke D (eds) Parity and War: Evaluations and Extensions of The War Ledger, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 93–105.
Kugler, J. & Douglas Lemke. eds. (1996). Parity and War: Evaluations and Extensions of the War Ledger, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Lee, S.H. (2015). “Global and regional orders in the 22st century in terms of multi-layered power transition theory: the cases of US-China and China-Japan relations”, International Area Studies Review, 18, 3, pp. 266-279.
Lemke, D. (2002). Regions of War and Peace, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, D. & Suzanne Werner (1996). “Power Parity, Commitment to Change, and War.” International Studies Quarterly, 40, pp. 235–260.
Levy, J.S. & Thompson, W.R. (2010). “Balancing on Land and at Sea”, International Security, 35, 1, pp. 7–43.
Lim Y. (2015). “How (dis)satisfied is China? A power transition theory perspective”, Journal of Contemporary China, 24, 92, pp. 280–297
Mearsheimer, J. (2010). “The gathering storm: China’s challenge to US power in Asia’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3, 4, pp. 381–396
Mearsheimer. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: Norton.
Military Balance. (2014). Available at: http:www.iiss.org
Mrotzek, M. (2011). “Approaching the tipping point: critical transitions in systems”, 29th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society.
Organski, A. F. K (1958). World Politics, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Organski, A. F. K & Jacek Kugler (1980). The War Ledger, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
Shirkhani, M., & Mahrough, F. (2018). POWER TRANSITION IN EAST ASIA: PROSPECT OF POWER IN LIGHT OF NEW DYNAMICS OF THE REGION. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 48(4), 1001-1019. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2018.248524.1007194
Mohammadali Shirkhani; Fatemeh Mahrough. "POWER TRANSITION IN EAST ASIA: PROSPECT OF POWER IN LIGHT OF NEW DYNAMICS OF THE REGION". POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 48, 4, 2018, 1001-1019. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2018.248524.1007194
Shirkhani, M., Mahrough, F. (2018). 'POWER TRANSITION IN EAST ASIA: PROSPECT OF POWER IN LIGHT OF NEW DYNAMICS OF THE REGION', POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 48(4), pp. 1001-1019. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2018.248524.1007194
Shirkhani, M., Mahrough, F. POWER TRANSITION IN EAST ASIA: PROSPECT OF POWER IN LIGHT OF NEW DYNAMICS OF THE REGION. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2018; 48(4): 1001-1019. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2018.248524.1007194