The nature and roots of European integration as one of the most successful models of post-integration after World War II, Due to its role in reducing conflict and the spread of peace between European countries, and because of the importance and role of the European Union in the current international system, It has always been a matter of interest from scholars and political theorists. Although various national, regional, and international variables were effective in the post-war European integration, the variable that we referred to in this article was the role of identity components in expanding cooperation and integration between European countries. The main question of this study is how does European integration create a European identity and promote peace in post-war Europe? The research hypothesis is that the European Union has been a project to save European countries based on Mythology and antagonism. The findings of the research show that European identity is a political and discursive and the result of the deconstruction of the discourse of national identity and its nodal point, Mythologies such as unity in diversity, cosmopolitan Europe and exceptionalism, as well as antagonism In order to reduce internal conflicts among European countries.
صدرا، محمد (1386). «نظریههای گفتمان از زبانشناسی تا علوم سیاسی»، فصلنامۀ پژوهشی مطالعات انقلاب اسلامی، سال سوم، ش 9 و 10.
کسرایی، محمد؛ و شیرازی، علی (1388). «نظریۀ لاکلا و موفه ابزاری کارآمد در فهم و تبیین پدیدههای سیاسی»، فصلنامۀ سیاست، دورۀ 39، ش 3.
مقدمی، محمدتقی (1390). «نظریۀ تحلیل گفتمان لاکلا و موف و نقد آن»، فصلنامۀ معرفت فرهنگی، اجتماعی، سال دوم، ش 2.
موسوی جشنی، سید صدرالدین (1392). «غیریتسازی در گفتمان فرهنگی امام خمینی»، پژوهشنامۀ متین، سال شانزدهم، ش 60.
ب) لاتین
Anastasiou, H. (2007). “The EU as a peace building system: deconstructing nationalism in an era of globalization”. International Journal of Peace Studies,pp: 31-50.
Bauböck, R. (1997). Citizenship and national identities in the European Union. Harvard Law School.
Cantat, C. (2015). Narratives and counter-narratives of Europe. Constructing and contesting Europeanity. Cahiers Mémoire et Politique.
Cantat, C. (2015). Contesting Europeanism: Discourses and Practices of Pro-migrant Organisations in the European Union (Doctoral dissertation, University of East London).
Cassimati, A. A. (2003, June). The EU and regional reform in Greece. In Workshop III: Greece and the EU.
Delanty, G. (2005). “The idea of a cosmopolitan Europe: On the cultural significance of Europeanization”. International Review of Sociology—Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 15(3), pp: 405-421.
Delanty, Gerard. (2014). "The Vicissitudes of European Identity." Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/7779956/The_Vicissitudes_of_European_Identity
Della S. V. (2014). Not So Different After All? The EU and Myths of Exceptionalism. Retrieved from: https://eustudies.org/conference/papers/download/78. Last visited 22 July 2017.
Gerard, D. (1995). Inventing Europe: Idea. Identity, Reality, London, Macmillan.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). “A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus”. British journal of political science, 39(01), pp: 1-23.
Jørgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage.
Kap, D. (2006). EUROPEAN IDENTITY & THE EUROEPAN UNION: THE PROSPECTS AND LIMITS (Doctoral dissertation, MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY).
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso.
Laffan, B. (1996). “The politics of identity and political order in Europe”. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(1), pp: 81-102.
Marfleet, P. (1999). Nationalism and internationalism in the new Europe. International Socialism, pp: 69-100.
Milward, A. S., Brennan, G., & Romero, F. (2000). The European rescue of the nation-state. Psychology Press.
Nancheva, N. (2012). Transforming identities in Europe: Bulgaria and Macedonia between nationalism and Europeanization (Doctoral dissertation, University of Westminster).
Neumann, I. B. (1999). Uses of the other:" the East" in European identity formation. Manchester University Press.
Pichler, F. (2009). “Cosmopolitan Europe: views and identity”. European Societies, 11(1), pp: 3-24.
Prodi, R. (2001). For a strong Europe, with a grand design and the means of action. Speech made at the Institut d'Etudes Politiques, Paris, 29.
Rear, D. (2013). Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory and Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis: An introduction and comparison. Unpublished paper.
Safavi, S. H., & Sarvestani, A. (2020). Narratives of EU single identity. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 49(1), 93-108. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2019.248415.1007193
MLA
Seyed Hamzeh Safavi; Abbas Sarvestani. "Narratives of EU single identity", POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 49, 1, 2020, 93-108. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2019.248415.1007193
HARVARD
Safavi, S. H., Sarvestani, A. (2020). 'Narratives of EU single identity', POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 49(1), pp. 93-108. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2019.248415.1007193
VANCOUVER
Safavi, S. H., Sarvestani, A. Narratives of EU single identity. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2020; 49(1): 93-108. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2019.248415.1007193