Intuitive multi-faceted application of decisions on nuclear policy and Comprehensive Plan of Action joint

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Intuitive multi-page decision making matrix model knows The solutions and the decisions of policy makers in the field of foreign policy decision-making of multiple strategies including optimum strategies (and not always the maximum) at the time of making decisions Design a strategy, a set of practices and procedures which are the decision makers involved in the choice between multiple solutions As well as the decision rule that dictates how the results of the above-mentioned choice used in making real decisions so that policy-makers to apply a two-stage process A preliminary study of the solutions available and choose the best solution from among the list of results first step towards minimizing risk and maximizing profits That's why this model is better than other current models of decision-making in foreign policy decision-making on the nuclear policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran until explain Comprehensive Plan of Action joint

Keywords


  1. Allison, Graham (1969). “Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis”, American political science review, vol. 63(3), PP:689-718
  2. -------------------- (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston: Little Brown.
  3. Dougherty, James; & faltzgraff, Robert (1990). Contending Theories of International Relations, New York: Harper & Row.
  4. Goertz, Gary (2004). “Constrains, Compromises and Decision Making”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.48(1), PP: 14-37.
  5. Gross Stein, Janice (2008). Foreign policy decision-making: rational, psychological and neurological models, chapter 6, smith_cho6.pdf.
  6. Janis, Irving; & Mann, Leon (1982). Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment, New York: Free Press.
  7. Jervis, Robert (1976). Perceptions and Misperceptions in International Politics, Princeton University Press.
  8. Jervis, Robert (2006). “Understanding Beliefs”, Political Psychology, Vol. 27(5), PP: 641-693.
  9. Mandel, Robert (1986). “Psychological Approaches to International Relations”, Political Psychology, ed. Margaret Herman, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  10. Mearsheimer, John (1995). “The False Promise of International Institutions”, International Security, Vol. 19(3), PP: 5-49.
  11. Mintz Alex (2004). How Do Leaders Make Decisions?, A Poliheuristic Perspective.
  12. Mintz, Alex; & De Rouen, Karel (2010). Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making, Cambridge University Press.
  13. Shen, Dingli (2008). “Can Sanctions Stop proliferation?”, The Washington Quarterly.
  14. Simon, Herbert (1985). “Human Nature in politics, the Dialogue of Psychology with political.

Waltz, Kenneth (1979). A Theory of international Politics, New York:

Volume 49, Issue 2
July 2019
Pages 395-412
  • Receive Date: 16 May 2016
  • Revise Date: 17 February 2018
  • Accept Date: 17 February 2018
  • First Publish Date: 22 June 2019