Many investigations have been done about Foucault's approach to Iran Islamic Revolution, but none of them did not explain its relation with ancient Greece philosophy. One main objective in this comparative literary study is to argue that Without understanding of Greece Philosophy and critic of Christianity, it did not Reveal cause of Foucault's protection of Revolution. Therfore, the main question here is that what relation is between Iran Shiite Revolution and Ancient Greece Philosophy? Do this similitudes is justifiable? In Foucault' view, Parrhesia is common point between Greece Philosophy and Tashayyu. Concepts of "Martyr", "the creation of subjects" and "Marjiyat" are features of Shiite Parrhesia Practice. Foucault maintains aim of Parrhesia and Tashayyu is the conversion of person into autonomous subjects. He has different understanding of political concept of Revolution , such as he understands Tashayyu as a political spirituality. this Paper reveals Philosophical origin of Foucault's approach to Revolution.
محمدی، جمال؛ دانش‌مهر، حسین؛ بیچرانلو، عبدالله (1392). «ارزیابی انتقادی روایت میشل فوکو از انقلاب اسلامی ایران»، فصلنامۀ پژوهشنامۀ انقلاب اسلامی، دانشگاه همدان: زمستان، ش 9.
مطهرنیا، مهدی (1382). «عرفان سیاسی در فرایند انقلاب اسلامی ایران»،: فصلنامۀ اندیشۀ انقلاب اسلامی، بهار، ش 5.
وبر، ماکس (1385). اخلاق پروتستانی و روح سرمایه‌داری، ترجمۀ عبدالکریم رشیدیان و پریسا منوچهری کاشانی، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
هگل (1387). خدایگان و بنده، ترجمه و پیشگفتار: حمید عنایت، تهران: خوارزمی.
ب) خارجی
Afray,Janet & Anderson, Kevin (2005). Foucault and the Iranian Revolution, Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
Carrete,Jeremy (2000). “Towards a Political Spirtuality”, Foucault and religion, London: Routledge.
Foucault, Michel (1983). “The Subject and Power”, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, The university of Chicago press.
------------------ (1988). Technologies of the self, Edited by Luther Martin and others, The University of Massachusetts Press.
----------------- (1990a).”Iran: The Spirit of a World Without Spirit”, Politics, Philosophy, Culture, Translated by Alan Sheridan and others, Edited by Lawrence D.Kritzman, London:Routledge.
--------------------- (1990b). “Politics and Reason”, Foucault:Politics, Philosophy,Culture, Translated by Alan Sheridan and others, Edited by Lawrence Kritzman, London: Routledge.
------------------- (1990c). The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality,V2), Translated by Robert Hurley,Vintage Books.
------------------ (1997a). “What is Enlightenment?”, Translated by Robert Hurley and others, ETHICS, Edited by Paul Rabinow,The Penguin Press.
--------------------- (1997b). “Friendship as a way of Life”, Translated by Robert Hurley and others, ETHICS, Edited by Paul Rabinow, The Penguin Press.
---------------------- (1999). “on religion”, Religion and Culture, Selected and edited by Jeremy Carrette,New York: Routledge.
------------------ (2005). The Hermeneutics of the Subject, edited by Ferderic Gros, General editors: Francois Ewald and Alessandro Fontana,Translated by Graham Burchel, Palgrave macmillan.
Leezenberg, Michiel (2004). “Power and Political Spirituality: Michel Foucault on the Islamic Revolution in Iran”, Michel Foucault and Theology, Edited by James Bernauer and Jeremy Carrete, Ashgate Publishing Company.
danyali, A. (2020). Foucault: Parrhesia's Practice in Shiite Revolution and ancient Greece. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 50(2), 555-572. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2020.282298.1007438
MLA
aref danyali. "Foucault: Parrhesia's Practice in Shiite Revolution and ancient Greece", POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 50, 2, 2020, 555-572. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2020.282298.1007438
HARVARD
danyali, A. (2020). 'Foucault: Parrhesia's Practice in Shiite Revolution and ancient Greece', POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 50(2), pp. 555-572. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2020.282298.1007438
VANCOUVER
danyali, A. Foucault: Parrhesia's Practice in Shiite Revolution and ancient Greece. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2020; 50(2): 555-572. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2020.282298.1007438
)