Nationalization of oil industry in Iran is one of the most important events in the contemporary history of Iran and can somehow be regarded as the first significant engagement of Iran in international politics. In the course of the events leading to and resulting from it, there were long serious discussions between Iran and Western partners, i.e. Britain and the US. While the former sought to change Iran’s policies through threats and rewards, the latter looked for compromise between the two parties. Despite threats, however, Iran did not change its behavior in a drastic way. The sole major objective of the Mosaddegh administration was to implement the law called Dispossession (of AIOC) when he could reach an agreement with the AIOC to increase state revenues, nullify the threats, and save the government. Although this has been emphasized in most analyses, it has not been addressed systematically. On the basis of the theory of ontological security and through discourse analysis, this article seeks to demonstrate how, despite the seriousness of material threats, the nationalization of oil became possible and all other options were ignored.
گیدنز، آنتونی (1393). تجدد و تشخص: جامعه و هویت شخصی در عصر جدید، ترجمة ناصر موفقیان، تهران: نشر نی.
مدنی، سلمان (1361). تاریخ سیاسی معاصر ایران، ج 1، قم: انتشارات اسلامی.
مدیر شانهچی، محسن (1377). «سیاست خارجی ایران در دوران زمامداری مصدق»، اطلاعات سیاسی-اقتصادی، ش 132-131، ص 95-84.
مصدق، محمد (1322، اسفند 16). صورت مذاکرات مجلس شورای ملی، بازیابی از مرکز اسناد مجلس شورای اسلامی.
--------- (1330، شهریور 17). مشروح مذاکرات مجلس شورای ملی، بازیابی از مرکز اسناد مجلس شورای اسلامی.
--------- (1330، آذر 3). مشروح مذاکرات مجلس شورای ملی، بازیابی از مرکز اسناد مجلس شورای اسلامی.
---------- (1330، فروردین 18). مشروح مذاکرات مجلس شورای ملی، بازیابی از مرکز اسناد مجلس شورای اسلامی.
--------- (1365). خاطرات و تألمات. تهران: انتشارات علمی.
مکی، حسین (1363). کتاب سیاه، ج 2، تهران: امیرکبیر.
ملکزاده، محمد (1383). «در پاسخ به مقاله مصدق و نفت: مصدق؛ ویژگیها و عملکردها»، فردوسی، ش 21-22.
موحد، محمدعلی (۱۳۸۴). خواب آشفته نفت، دکتر مصدق و نهضت ملی، تهران: کارنامه.
میرفطروس، علی (1386). دکتر محمد مصدق آسیبشناسی یک شکست، فرانسه: فرهنگ.
میلانی، عباس (1392). نگاهی به شاه، ترجمة عباس میلانی، تورنتو: پرشینسیرکل.
ناظرزاده، احمد (1329، تیر 4). مشروح مذاکرات مجلس شورای ملی، بازیابی از مرکز اسناد مجلس شورای اسلامی.
نجاتی، غلامرضا (1378). مصدق، سالهای مبارزه و مقاومت، تهران: مؤسسۀ خدمات فرهنگی رسا.
نراقی، احمد (1387). «برگرداندن مصدق اشتباه بود»، یادآور، ص 113-110.
نریمان، محمود. (1329، آذر 28). مشروح مذاکرات مجلس شورای ملی. بازیابی از مرکز اسناد مجلس شورای اسلامی.
کاتوزیان، محمدعلی همایون (1371). مصدق و نبرد قدرت، تهران: مؤسسۀ خدمات فرهنگی رسا.
------------------ (1372). استبداد، دموکراسی و نهضت ملی، تهران: مرکز
والترز، ورنون (1369). مذاکرات مصدق و هریمن، ترجمة شمسالدین، امیرعلایی، تهران: میترا.
ب) انگلیسی
Abrahamian, Ervand (2013). The Coup and the Roots of Modern U.S.-Iranian Relations, New York: New Press.
Linda Åhäll & Stefan Borg (2013). Predication, Presupposition and Subject-positioning. In laura shepherd, Critical Approaches to Security: An Introduction to Theories and Method (pp. 196-208), Abingdon: Routledge.
Boroujerdi, Mehrzad (2003). Triumphs And Travails of Authoritarian Modernisation in Iran. In Stephanie Cronin , The Making of Modern Iran, New York: Routledge.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis, New York: Palgrave.
Roxanne Lynn, Doty (1993). “Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol.37, pp. 297-320.
Foucault, Michel (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.), New York: Pantheon Books.
Gasiorowski, Mark and Malcolm Byrne, eds. (2004). Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran, New York: Syracuse University Press.
Giddens, Anthony (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity, New York: polity press.
Hammack, Phillip L. and Pilecki, Andrew (2012). “Narrative as a Root Metaphor for Political Psychology”, Political Psychology, Vol.33, pp.75-103.
Hankiss, Agnes (1981). Ontologies of the Self: On the Mythological Rearranging of One’s Life- History. In D. Bertaux, Biography and Society: The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences (pp. 203-218). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Howard, Stein. (2014). “Chosen Trauma and a Widely Shared Sense of Jewish Identity and History”, Journal of Psychohistory, pp.236-257.
Hymans, Jacqes E. (2010). “The Arrival of Psychology Constructivism”, International Theory, Vol. 3, pp. 461-467.
Kinnvall, Catherine (2013). Trauma and the Politics of Fear: Europe at the Crossroads. In N. Demertzis, Emotions in Politics (pp. 143-166). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kress, Gunther & Hodge, Robert (1993). Language as Ideology, London: Routledge.
Kristeva, Julia (1982). Powers of horror: An essay of abjection, New York: Columbia University Press.
lynd, Helen Merrell (1958). On Shame and the Search for Identity. London: Routledge.
McSweeney, Bill (1999). Security, Identity and Interests A Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitzen, Jennifer (2006). “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol.12, pp. 341-370.
Mitzen, Jennifer & Larson, Kyle (2017). “Ontological Security and Foreign Policy”, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, pp. 1-26.
Patterson , Molly & Monroe, Kristen Renwick (1998). “Narrative in Political Science”, Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 1, pp. 315-331.
Proulx, Travis & Heine, Steven J. (2008). “The Case of The Transmogrifying Experimenter: Affirmation of a Moral Schema Following Implicit Change Detection”, Psychological Science,Vol. 19, pp. 1294-1300.
Sayyid, Bobby. S (1997). A Fundamental Fear: Eurocentrism and the Emergence of Islamism, London: Zed Books Ltd.
Steele, Brent (2017). “Organizational Processes and Ontological (in) Security: Torture, The CIA and The United States”, Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 50, pp. 69-89.
Steele, Brent (2008). Ontological Security in International Relations, New York: Routledge.
Tzifakis, Nikolaos (2011). “Problematizing Human Security: a General/ Contextual Conceptual Approach”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 11, pp. 353-368.
Weldes, Jutta & Saco, Diana (1996). “Making State Action Possible: The United States and the Discursive Construction of `the Cuban Problem`1960-1994”, Millennium, pp. 361-395.
Wolf, Reinhard (2011). “Respect and disrespect in international politics: the significance of status recognition”, International Theory,Vol, 3, pp. 105-142.
Zinken, Jorg (2007). “Discourse Metaphors: The Link Between Figurative Language and Habitual Analogies”, Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 18, pp. 445-466.
Moshizadeh, H., & Khanlarkhani, M. H. (2020). Ontological Security and the Nationalization of Oil Industry in Iran. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 50(4), 1269-1292. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2020.270829.1007345
MLA
Homeira Moshizadeh; Mohammad Hossein Khanlarkhani. "Ontological Security and the Nationalization of Oil Industry in Iran", POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 50, 4, 2020, 1269-1292. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2020.270829.1007345
HARVARD
Moshizadeh, H., Khanlarkhani, M. H. (2020). 'Ontological Security and the Nationalization of Oil Industry in Iran', POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 50(4), pp. 1269-1292. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2020.270829.1007345
VANCOUVER
Moshizadeh, H., Khanlarkhani, M. H. Ontological Security and the Nationalization of Oil Industry in Iran. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2020; 50(4): 1269-1292. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2020.270829.1007345