Theoretical Models of Explaining the Islamic Revolution: Liberation Theology as an Alternative Framework

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran, Iran

2 A PhD Candidate in Political Science, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran, Iran


Previous research on the causes of the occurrence of the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran have concentrated on the analysis of the political and economic components of this significant political event. Others have considered  the social, historical and even broader contexts surrounding the popular uprising which led to an unforeseen political change in a revolutionizing country.  However, some scholars have shown the importance of the core ideological component of this revolt. In the first part of this paper, the authors examine the three main theoretical approaches used for explaining the cultural features of Iranian Revolution, i.e.,  symbolism (symbolic interpretation), culturism (interpretation based on assumptions about Iranian culture),  discourse-based (interpretation based on discourse analysis). A comparative analysis of these approaches shows serious and fundamental weaknesses in their explanatory power to determine the impact of the cultural factors on the Iranian Revolution. The authors assert that symbolism, culturism, and discourse analysis are not compatible with the past events, and are incapable of explaining the complexities of this political phenomenon.
Accordingly, in the second part, the  "Islamic liberation theology" as an alternative theoretical framework is introduced, and the impact of Islam and Shi’ism is studied to make the advent of the revolution at that time clear and understandable. They attempt to find answers to two research questions: 1.What is the most appropriate theoretical framework to explain the cultural component of the Iranian revolution? 2. Why and how did the Islamic liberation theology as the most important cultural component, lead to the revolution that overthrew the Pahlavi regime in Iran? In the research hypothesis, it is stated that Islamic liberation theology is the most appropriate explanatory factor of the 1979 revolution in Iran. The qualitative single- case study of the Islamic Revolution in Iran was carried out by the interpretation of past events and the analysis of arguments contained in the previous studies of the revolution and contemporary Iranian politics. Given the social context of  the 1950s and 1960s conditions in Iranian society, Shi’ism as a form of Islamic liberation theology was understood and accepted by the majority of Iranians, because it promised freedom from oppression, justice, and independence,  just to name a few social and political rights. The Shiite scholars presented  the idea of the creation of a new socio-political order to replace the old order which was centered on an absolutist monarchical system of government.
The overwhelming Iranian support in a national referendum which led to the declaration of Iran as an Islamic Republic after the overthrow of the Pahlavi regime in the country is an indication of the importance of the role of Shiite religion as the main variable of the cultural component of the revolution. In the months leading up to the Iranian revolution, Islamic liberation theology replaced the foremost competing ideologies, forcing the opposition groups to form an asymmetric alliance with Islamist revolutionaries. Finally, the discussion of the merit of the "Islamic liberation theology" as a useful framework to explain the cultural aspect of the 1979 revolution is the main focus of the concluding part. The use of this theoretical approach is suggested to provide better understanding and explanation of how the revolutionary change occurred in Iran.


Aghaie, Kamran. (2001, May) “The Karbala Narrative: Shi’i Political Discourse in Modern Iran in the 1960s and 1970s,” Journal of Islamic Studies 12, 2: 151-176. Available at: 26198125 (Accessed 25 June 2021).
Alem, Abdolrahman. (2016) The Foundations of Political Science. Tehran: Nay. [in Persian]
Amid Zanjani, Abbas-Ali. (1989) The Islamic Revolution and Its Roots, 2nd ed. Tehran: Publishing Organization of the Ministry of Culture. [in Persian]
Amir Arjomand, Said. (1986, April) “Iran's Islamic Revolution in Comparative Perspective,” World Politics 38, 3: 383-414, .
Burns, Gene. (1996) “Ideology, Culture, and Ambiguity: The Revolutionary Process in Iran,” Theory and Society 25, 3: 349-388. Available at: (Accessed 25 June 2021).
Cosgrave, William. (1986) “The Theology of Liberation,” The Furrow 37, 8: 506-516. Available at: 27678317 (Accessed 4 July 2021).
Daheshyar, Hossein. (2008, Spring) "The Politicization of Political Science in America and the Liberation Theology," Regional Studies Quarterly 9, 2: 121-140. Available at: article/28479 (Accessed 16 August 2021). [in Persian]
Enayat, Hamid. (1998, February) "Islamic Revolution: Religion in the Form of a Political Ideology," trans., Amir Saeid Elahi. Political Economical Ettela’at 137-138: 42-51. Available at: (Accessed 16 August 2021). [in Persian]
Foran, John. (2003, Summer) “A Theoretical Analysis of the 1977-1979 Iranian Revolution,” trans., Seyed Sadreddin Mousavi. Matin 19: 119-156. Available at: articlepage/101799 (Accessed 16 August 2021). [in Persian]
Golmohammadi, Ahmad. (2009, Winter) "From Explanation to 'Anti-Explanation': Challenges in Conceptualization of a Revolution," Social Sciences 15, 42-43: 1-12. Available at: article_ 5357.html (Accessed 5 August 2021). [in Persian]
Gutierrez, Gustavo. (1999) “The Task and Content of Liberation Theology,” in Christopher Rowland, ed. Liberation Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, Fred. (1982, Septmber) “The Iranian Revolution,” Political Studies 30, 3: 437-444, 1467-9248. 1982.tb00551.x>.
Hemmati, Homayon. (2014, Autumn) “History and Explanation of the Structure of Political and Liberation Theology,” Ma’rifat-e Adyan 5, 4: 123-138. Available at: 340614 (Accessed 16 August 2021). [in Persian]
Khomeini, Rouhollah. (2000) Islamic Government: Governance of the Jurist. Tehran: The Institute for the Compilation and Publication of the Works of Imam Khomeini. [in Persian]
———. (2007) Sahifeh-ye Imam. Tehran: The Institute for the Compilation and Publication of the Works of Imam Khomeini. [in Persian]
Kurzman, Charles. (2019) The Unthinkable Revolution in Iran, trans., Mohammad Molla-Abbasi, 3rd ed. Tehran: Tarjoman. [in Persian]
Mirsepassi-Ashtiani, Ali. (1994) “The Crisis of Secular Politics and the Rise of Political Islam in Iran,” Social Text 38: 51-84. Available at: (Accessed 25 June 2021).
Moaddel, Mansoor. (2003) Class, Politics and Ideology in the Iranian Revolution, tran., Mohammad Salar Kasraei. Tehran: Center for the Recognition of Islam and Iran. [in Persian]
Moeini Alamdari, Jahangir. (2004, Winter) "Ideology, Discourse and Political Analysis," The Encyclopedia of Law and Politics 1, 1: 99-112. Available at: article_6267.html (Accessed 16 August 2021). [in Persian]
Panahi, Mohammad Hossein. (2006, Winter) "Jihad and Martyrdom Values in the Islamic Republic Slogans," Journal of Social Sciences Letter 29: 59-90. Available at: article_18315.html (Accessed 16 August 2021). [in Persian]
———. (2010) Theories of Revolution: Outbreak, Process and Outcomes. Tehran: Samt. [in Persian]
Political Studies and Research Institute. (2006) American Spy Den Documents, Vol. 3. Tehran: Political Studies and Research Institute. [in Persian]
Skocpol, Theda. (2003, Spring) "Rentier State and Shiite Islam in the Iranian Revolution," trans., Mohammad Taghi Delforouz. Strategic Studies Quarterly 6, 19: 119-141. Available at: article_1068.html (Accessed 16 August 2021). [in Persian]
Taleban, Mohammad Reza. (2003, Winter) "A Logical Introduction to the Cultural Explanation of the Iranian Revolution," Journal of Cultural Studies Letter 8, 8: 49-68. Available at: (Accessed 16 August 2021). [in Persian]
Varzi, Roxanne. (2011) “Iran’s French Revolution: Religion, Philosophy and Crowds,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 637, 1: 53-63, 1177/ 0002716211404362>. 
Volume 51, Issue 2
September 2021
Pages 535-513
  • Receive Date: 04 May 2020
  • Revise Date: 16 August 2021
  • Accept Date: 12 September 2021
  • First Publish Date: 12 September 2021