Analyzing Institutional Factors Influencing the Formation of the State and its Performance in Afghanistan, 2001-2014

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran, Iran.

2 A PhD Candidate, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Following the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan by the U.S. and its international allies, intense efforts aimed at peacemaking and conflict resolution were made at all levels to put an end to the instability and violence in this war-ravaged country. Accordingly, an attempt was made to create a new consolidated government with a focus on institutionalization in Afghanistan. An international conference was held in Bonn, Germany in 2001, in order to facilitate the consultation between Afghan political leaders and other stakeholders to discuss the establishment of the foundations of the new government in Afghanistan. The consequences of this conference included the establishment of a score of significant national organizations which constituted the foundations of the new government in Afghanistan, and the creation of a dominant coalition of diverse Aghan groups which became the ruling class. The new government received foreign aid from the U.S., its Western allies, regional states, international aid agencies, and other donors. However, the newly-established government did not last more than two decades.
One of the main objectives of this research is to investigate the institutional factors influencing the formation of the government and its performance in Afghanistan in the period of 2001-2014. The research questions are as follows: 1. What institutional factors have influenced the formation of the government in Afghanistan and its performance in 2001-2014 time period? 2. How have these institutional factors affected the formation and performance of the government in Kabul in 2001-2014 when Afghanistan benefited from "relative political stability"? In the research hypothesis, it is argued that the institutional factors led to the formation of a dominant coalition by the stakeholders among the institutions on the basis of the 2001 Bonn Agreement, and in turn the dominant coalition government was able to achieve relative political stability through rentierism and “limited access orders” to rent for the individuals and institutions outside the coalition. The method of institutional analysis—which was presented in the works of Douglas North and his associates—are used to collect and analyze data from various reports and statistical sources provided by reliable national and international centers. In addition, the authors gained insights by a careful investigation of the selected findings of the work of other scholars concerning the issue in question.
The theoretical framework was based on North’s institutionalist theory and his concept of limited access orders. The theory is useful in describing and explaining the political and economic state of affairs in the post-conflict societies. In most developing countries, individuals and institutions actively use or threaten to use violence for the purpose of having access to resources and accumulate wealth, but development programs would not be successful unless violence is curbed. Reliable stability is the most important precondition for development in all dimensions, particularly in the process of state building. To achieve stability, it is necessary to end violence and eliminate the concealed threat of the use of violence. North’s concept of the limited access orders refers to a type of institutional arrangement in which conflict-prone and conflict-ridden countries are able to curb violence by providing economic incentives to powerful groups to cooperate with each other in maintaining peace and stability. The authors compared the government performance of two previous Afghan leaders: 1) Hamid Karzai’s government during 2001-2014 which coincided with the emergence of the new government and the period of relative stability in Afghanistan; and 2) Mohammad Ashraf Ghani’s government during 2014-2021, which ended in the withdrawal of U.S, forces from the country, and Taliban’ return to power.  The formation of a dominant coalition based on the logic of rent distribution, and on a kind of profitable interaction of rival individuals and institutions led to a period of stability. In other words, the behavior of the political elites in the government (dominant coalition) of Afghanistan was guided and limited by rent and this situation led to a period of relative political stability. The findings could help to gain a better and more accurate understanding of the reasons for the 2021 collapse of the regime against a background of unravelling western support in Afghanistan, and the return of Taliban to the seat of power in Kabul.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. References

    1. Ademmer, E; Langbein, J; Börzel, T.A. (2020). “Varieties of Limited Access Orders: The Nexus between Politics and Economics in Hybrid Regimes,” Governance 33, 1: 191-208, <DOI:10.1111/gove.12414>.
    2. Ansari, G. (2008). Jāmeʿeh-ye Pashtun, tahavol-e hoviat va monāsebāt (az ahmad khān-e- ebdāli tā eshghāl-e afghānestān tavasot-e roos’hā, Pashtun Society, the Evolution of Identity and Relationships, from Ahmad Khan Abdali to the Occupation of Afghanistan by the Russians, PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
    3. Bagheri, I. (2017). "Sakhtar-e siyāsī-ye Afghanistan, raeis-e jomhoor and raeis-e ejrāi-ye, Afghanistan's Political Structure, President and Chief Executive," Faslnāmeh-ye motāleāt-e rāhbordi-ye jahān-e eslām, Journal of Strategic Studies of the Islamic World, 69: 149-182. Available at: http://noo.rs/8EWzC (Accessed 3 June 2022). [In Persian]
    4. Bakhtiari, S; Zaki, M.M. (2018). “Goroh’hā-ye ghomi and tozieʿ-e ghodrat-e siyāsī dar Afghānistān, ta’dil ya taghir-e nezām-e siyāsī dar keshvar, Ethnic Groups and the Distribution of Political Power in Afghanistan; Adjusting or Changing the Political System in the Country," Afghanistan Institute of Strategic Studies, Kabul. [In Persian]
    5. Beblawi, H. (1987). “The Rentier State in the Arab World.” Arab Studies Quarterly 9, 4: 383-398. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41857943 (Accessed 14 July 2023).
    6. Bizhan, N. (2022). “Building Legitimacy and State Capacity in Afghanistan,” in Nematullah Bizhan, ed. State Fragility: Case Studies and Comparisons, 24-63. London: Routledge, . Available at: 10.4324_9781003297697-2_chapterpdf-libre.pdf (Accessed 14 July 2023).
    7. Bonn Agreement (Agreement on Provisional Arrangements in Afghanistan Pending the Re-establishment of Permanent Government Institutions) (2001). un.org, United Nations Peacemaker, Available at:
      https://peacemaker.un.org/afghanistan-bonnagreement2001 (Accessed 24 July 2023).
    8. Butler, E. (2012). “Public Choice– A Prime,” iea.org.uk, The Institute of Economic Affairs), 75-81. Available at: http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/ default/files/ publications/files/IEA%20Public%20Choice%20web%20complete%2029.1.12.pdf (Accessed 20 May 2021).
    9. Chesterman, S; Ignatieff, M; Thakur, R eds. (2005). Making States Work: State Failure and the Crisis of Governance. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
    10. Dobbins, J. (2008). After the Taliban: Nation Building in Afghanistan. Washington, DC: Potomac Book.
    11. Finance Ministry. (2012). the Report of Finance Ministry. Kabul, Afghanistan: Finance Ministry. Available at: https://sao.gov.af/sites/default/files.pdf (Accessed 6 November 2022). [In Persian]
    12. Fishstein, P; Farahi, A. (2023). The World’s Humanitarian, Economic, and Political Engagement with Afghanistan. New York: Center on International Cooperation (CIC), New York University. Available at: https://cic.nyu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/The-Worlds-Humanitarian-Economic-and-Political-Engagement-with-Afghanistan-2023.pdf (Accessed 16 July 2023).
    13. Ghanavati, N; and et al. (2017). “Bāz’tolid-e sākhtār-e rānti dar Iran (Reproduction of Rent Structure in Iran),” Faslnāmeh-ye motāleāt-e rāhbordi siyāsatʹgozarī-ʼi omomī, Journal of Strategic Public Policy Studies, 7, 25: 203-221. Available at: https://sspp.iranjournals. Ir/article_29733.html (Accessed 25 July 2023). [In Persian]
    14. Global Witness. (2012). “Āyande-ye sector-e estekhrāj-e ma’āden-e Afgānistān dar ma’raz-e khatar gharārdād’hā-ye za’eef gharār dārad, The Future of Afghanistan's Mining Sector is at Risk of Weak Contracts,” globalwitness.org. Available at: https://www.globalwitness.org/en/archive/getting-to-gold-report-dari (Accessed 5 July 2023). [In Persian]
    15. Haji‌Yousefi, A. (1997). “Rānt, dolat, rāntier and rāntierism, barresi-ye mafhomi (Government, Rent, Rentier, and rentierism; A Conceptual Review," Ettela'at-e siyāsī and eghtesādī, Political and Economic Bimonthly Journal, 126-125: 152-155. Available at: https://sid.ir/paper/419581/fa (Accessed 12 October 2022). [In Persian]
    16. Joint Independent Committee for Monitoring and Evaluation Committee of the Fight against Administrative Corruption. (2016). “Gozāresh-e arzyābi-ye āsib’paziri’hā-ye fesād-e edāri bae sath-e vezārat-e ma’āref, Vulnerability Assessment Report of Administrative Corruption at the Level of the Ministry of Education,” Kabul (research.amanote.com). Available at: https://research. amanote.com/publication/eZjz2nMB KQvf0BhiCl2v (Accessed 26 November 2022). [In Persian]
    17. Joint Independent Committee for Monitoring and Evaluation Committee of the Fight against Administrative Corruption. (2013). “Chāhāromin gozāresh-e sheshmāh-e (Fourth Six-Month Report, 31 December 2012 to 30 June 2013),” Kabul (afghandata.org). Available at: http://www.afghandata.org:8080/ xmlui/handle/ azu/20715 (Accessed 27 June 1401). [In Persian]
    18. Khalilzad, Z. (2016). Ferestādeh: safar-e man dar jahāni motelātem az kabul be kakh-e sefid, The Envoy: My Journey in a Turbulent World from Kabul to the White House, trans. Mostafa Ahmadi. Tehran: Ketab-e Kole’Poshti Publications, 3rd [In Persian]
    19. Khezri, M; Renani, M. (2004). "Rānt’joei and hazinehā-ye ejtemāʿi-ye ān (Rent-seeking and its Social Costs)," Roz’nāmeh-ʼi mofid (Mofid Daily) 10, 45: 80. Available at: https://sid.ir/paper/3654/fa (Accessed 5 November 2022). [In Persian]
    20. Löfström, A. (2022). "A Fatigued State: Exploring the Fragilities of the Afghan State," The Swedish Institute of International Affairs (UI) Papers 2. Available at: https://www.ui.se/globalassets/ui.se-eng/publications/ui-publications/2022/ui-paper-no.-2-2022.pdf (Accessed 10 July 2023).
    21. Mirbeigi, S. (2016). “Baresi-ye tatbighi-ye rābeteh-ye rāntierism and olgo-ye hokmrāni-ye khob, A Comparative Study of the Relationship between Rentierism and Good Governance Pattern; Study of Six Countries: Iran, Kuwait, Azerbaijan, Indonesia, Malaysia and Turkey,” Faslnāmeh-ye oloom-e ejtemāʿi Social Sciences, 23, 73: 117-170, <DOI:10.22054/qjss.2017.7206>. [In Persian]
    22. Nassiri Aghdami, A. (2013). “Ravesh'shenāsi-ye tahlil-e nahdi-ye masāel-e eghtesādi (Methodology of Institutional Analysis of Economics Problems,” Faslnāmeh-ye ravesh'shenāsi-ye oloom-e ensānī, Humanities Methodology Quarterly, 18, 71: 119-144. Available at:http://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_198. html?lang=en (Accessed 12 July 2023). [In Persian]
    23. North, D.C; and et al. (2012). “Limited Access Orders: Rethinking the Problems of Development and Violence,” Researchgate.net. Available at: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/259552628_Limited_ Access_OrdersRethinking_the_Problems_of_Development_and_Violence/citation/download (Accessed 23 April 2021).
    24. North, D.C; and et al. (2017). Politics, Economy and Development Issues in the Shadow of Violence, trans. Mohsen Mirdamadi and Mohammad Hossein Naimipour. Tehran: Rozeneh, 3rd ed.[In Persian]
    25. North, D.C., Wallis, J.J; Weingast, B.R. (2009). Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    26. North, D.C; Wallis, J.J; Webb, S.B; Weingast, B.R. (2007). “Limited Access Orders in the Developing World: A New Approach to the Problems of Development,” World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, .
    27. Pajhwak, Kh; Dariyabi, Z. (2022). "Hokomat-e khānevādeh’hā; gozāreshi az naghsh-e chehreh’ha-ye bānofoze dar fesād-e edāri va māli, the Rule of Families; A Report on the Role of Influential Figures in Administrative and Financial Corruption,” Roz’nāmeh-ʼi ettelāʿāt-e roz, Information of the Day Daily, Available at: https://www.etilaatroz.com/49967 (Accessed 30 November 2022). [In Persian]
    28. Pan, A; Karami, K; Nemat, U (2021). Mavād-e mokhader and toseʿ dar Afghānistān; tahlil-e polici-ye meli and bāzigarān (Narcotics and Development in Afghanistan; An Analysis of National Policy and Actors), Tran. Azizollah Esfandiari. Kabul: Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. [In Persian]
    29. (2001). "Creating A New Afghanistan- Filling the Vacuum,” Frontline. Available at: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/ campaign/ withus/cbonn.html (Accessed 12 July 2023).
    30. Rodríguez, E.B. (2023). “Why Did State-Building Policy Fail in Afghanistan ?” Open Journal of Political Science 13: 129-154. <DOI:4236/ ojps.2023.131008>.
    31. Rogers, S. (2023). “The Emergence of the ‘Rentocrat’,” New Political Economy (Online) 1-14, . Available at: https:// www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/ 023.2172148? Src=recsys (Accessed 12 July 2023).
    32. Schwarz, R. (2011). “Does War Make States? Rentierism and the Formation of States in the Middle East,” European Political Science Review 3, 3: 419-443, .
    33. Smith, A. (1960). The Wealth of Nations. London: Every Man’s Library.
    34. Soroush, I. (2019). "The Percentage of Employees of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are Illegally Employed," Roz’nāmeh-ʼi ettelāʿāt-e roz, Information of the Day Daily, Available at: etilaatroz.com/81945/40-percent-of-state-department-employees-are-hired-illegally (Accessed 25 September 2022). [In Persian]
    35. Stratford, B. (2023). “Rival Definitions of Economic Rent: Historical Origins and Normative Implications,” New Political Economy 28, 3: 347-362, .
    36. World Bank Group. (2021). “Classification of Fragility and Conflict Situations for World Bank Group Engagement,” The World Bank Group. Last updated: 2021-07-01. Available at: https://thedocs. worldbank.org/ en/doc/8bc2ffd2ca0d2 f174fee8315ad4c385b-0090082021/ original/Classification-of-Fragility-and-Co-nflict-Situations-web-FY22.pdf (Accessed 12 July 2023).