Religion, Law and Development: Studying the Performance of Forty Years of Iran's Legislative System, 1980-2020

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

2 A PhD Candidate in Economics, Department of Economics, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

A country’s level of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita over time had frequently been used as an indicator of economic development. Iran’s per capita income in 1977 (shortly before the 1979 revolution) has been higher than its average income earned per person recorded for all the years of the post-revolutionary era thus far. Therefore, a question is raised whether the country’s lower level of economic development (as measured by its per capita income) has been a result of the religious nature of the key governing bodies of the Islamic Republic of Iran established on the basis of Article Four of the Constitution. It is crucial to investigate the accuracy of the assertion that these institutions might have indeed contributed to the vicious cycles of underdevelopment of the country in order to find alternative solutions to the slow-down in Iran’s economic development process.
The authors attempt to answer the following two research questions: 1. In accordance with Douglas North's chain of belief-institution-transformation, how has Iran’s level of national development been influenced by the religious nature of its key political institutions established after the revolution based on Article Four of the Constitution? 2. To what extent have the Guardian Council (Shorā-ye negahbān) and the Expediency Discernment Council (Majmaʿ tashkhis-e maṣleḥat-e nezām) influenced Iran’s economic development in the 1980-2020 period? A careful investigation of this issue is important in order to facilitate the policymakers’ better understanding of the underlying causes of the persistent vicious cycles of the country's underdevelopment in the hope of averting a worsening of the situation. Based on the theoretical framework of Douglas North's notion    of the  belief-institution-economic  performance,  the  authors  hypothesize that religious beliefs have had an impact on the enactment of laws and ultimately on economic development in Iran in the 40-year period from 1980 to 2020. Thematic analysis is used to collect and interpret qualitative data pattern on themes in the data set provided by the Guardian Council (GC) Research Institute related to the GC's decisions and opinions on the laws introduced and forwarded by the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Majles-e shorā-ye eslāmi or Iran’s parliament) since 1980 (i.e., the starting year of the GC’s function). The main focus of this paper is on the role of the Guardian Council which is an influential institution—because its members perform the task of screening each legislation concerning its constitutionality—and thus has veto power over legislations introduced by the unicameral parliament (Majles). The Expediency Discernment Council (EDC) also has a significant impact on the legislation process by settling disagreements between the Majlis and the GC over laws and deciding which of the two political institutions is right.
The findings revealed that a total of 3339 legislation were screened by the GC during the 40-year period, only 175 legislations (5.24 percent) were disapproved, 12 legislations (0.36 percent) remained ambiguous, and 3152 legislations (94.40%) were finally approved. 171 cases (14.73 percent) had also been referred to the EDC at the request of the Majlis. 175 legislations had been rejected by both the GC and the EDC because they were deemed as non-congruent with Islamic law as emphasized in Article four of the Constitution. Among all the rejected legislations, no important piece of legislation with economic implication was observed, with the exception of the case related to the Financial Action Task Group (FATF).  However, the impasse on the FATF legislation as well as the other undecided legislations—particularly on the most challenging foreign policy issues—can be seen as the weaknesses in the political institutions’ decision-making processes. Only the accrued cost of the month-long delays caused by the drawn-out process of screening the legislations might be considered a monetary factor with adverse impact on economic performance of the country, but there might be less evident factors which have indirect development implications. Considering the impact of these issues on the country’s national interest, it is the duty of the experts to further examine the economic and political implications of these delayed legislations and persuade the policymakers to work towards conflict resolution and reach a consensus.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. References 

    1. Azimi, H. (1995). Madār’hā-ye toseʿ-nayāftegi dar eghtesād-e Iran, Circles of Underdevelopment in Iran's Economy, Tehran: Ney. ‌‌[In Persian]
    2. Becker, S.O; and et al. (2020). “Religion in Economic History: A Survey,” ESI Working Paper 20-22. Available at: https://digitalcommons.chapman. Edu/ esi_working_papers/317 (Accessed 20 December 2023).
    3. Fairahi, D. (2020). Mafhom-e ghānoon dar Īrān-e moʿāser, tahavolāt-e pishā’mashroteh, The Concept of Law in the Contemporary Iran, The Pre-Constitutional Developments, and Tehran: Ney. [In Persian]
    4. Faundez, J. (2016). "Douglass North’s Theory of Institutions: Lessons for Law and Development," Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 8: 373-419, <DOI:1007/s40803-016-0028-8>.
    5. Ghasemi, Y; Hashemi, A. (2020). “Anjām-e pajohesh be ravesh-e tahlil-e temātic (Conducting Research by Thematic Analysis: A Practical, Step-by-Step Guide for Learning and Teaching, A Case Study of Music Usage of M.A. Students at Ilam University,” Farhang-e Ilam, Journal of Ilam Culture, 20: 64-65: 7-33. Available at: https://www.farhangeilam.ir/ html? lang=en (Accessed 17 November 2023).  ‌‌[In Persian]
    6. Gohardani, F; Tizro, Z. (2019). The Political Economy of Iran: Development, Revolution and Political Violence. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
    7. Hadi Zenouz, B. (2019). Tahlil-e tahrim’hā-ye bein’ol mellali-ye Iran dar chār’chob-e eghtesād-e siyāsi, An Analysis of International Sanctions of Iran within the Framework of Political Economy, in the Period 1979-2018. Tehran: Nashr-e eghtesād-e fardā. ‌‌[In Persian]
    8. Hallaq, W. (2007). Tārikh-e teorihā’ye hoghoghi-ye eslāmi, History of Islamic Legal Theories, trans. Mohammad Rasekh. Tehran: Ney. ‌‌[In Persian]
    9. Imam Jomezadeh, S.J; Monfared, S.Q. (2004). “Risheh’hā-ye tārikhi-ye toseʿ-nayāftegi-ye siyāsī Īrān, tā ghab az enghelāb-e eslāmi, az manzar-e andisheh’garān-e liberal va eslāmi, The Historical Roots of Iran's Political Underdevelopment (Before the Islamic Revolution), from the Perspective of Liberal and Islamic Thinkers,” Majalehʼi dāneshkadehʼi hoghogh va olom-e siyāsī, The Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, 65: 35-58. Available at: https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_11240.html (Accessed 20 December 2023). ‌‌[In Persian]
    10. Katouzian, H. (2013). Iranian, dorān-e bāstān tā doreh-ye moʿāser, Iranians, Ancient to the Contemporary Era, Trans. Hossein Shahidi. Tehran: Markaz. ‌‌[In Persian]
    11. Knippenberg, E; and et al. (2023). Iran Poverty Diagnostic- Poverty and Shared Prosperity. New York: World Development Group. Available at: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/8189144/iran-poverty-diagnostic/9099561 (Accessed 24 June 2023).
    12. Kohistaninejad, M. (2002). Chālesh-e mazhab and modernism, sayre andisheh-ye siyāsi-ye mazhabi dar Iran, The Challenge of Religion and Modernism: The Course of Religious Political Thought in Iran, The Half of the 20th Century, and Tehran: Ney. ‌‌[In Persian]
    13. Kuran, T. (2018). Shekāf-e amigh dar khāvare’miyāneh, The Long Divergence: How Islamic Law Held Back the Middle East, Trans. Seyed Mehdi Mir Hosseini. Tehran: Mehri. ‌‌[In Persian]
    14. Mahdavi, A. (2010). The Fundamentals of the Role of Time and Space in Inferences of the Religious Precepts from the Perspective of Imam Khomeini (RA) and Martyr Sadr (RA): A Comparative Review. Tehran: Imam Sadiq (AS) University. ‌‌[In Persian]
    15. Naini, M.M. (2001). Resāleh-i dar mardom’sālāri-ye dini va estebdād-e dini (Alarming the Nation and Purifying the Religion, A Thesis on Religious Democracy and Religious Tyranny, Tehran: Amirkabir. [In Arabic]
    16. Narimani, M; and et al. (2012). “Estekhrāj-e delālat’hā-ye siyāsati-ye roykard-e tatavori dar hozeh-ye elm va fan’āvari, Extracting the Political Implications of an Evolutionary Approach in the Field of Science and Technology: A Thematic Analysis,” Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 5, 2: 1-17. Available at https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/ article_12868. html?lang=en (Accessed 20 December 2023). ‌‌[In Persian]
    17. North, D. (1998) Nahād’hā, taghirāt-e nahādi and amalkard-e eghtesādi, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, trans. Mohammad Reza Moeini. Tehran: Sāzemān-e barnāmeh and bodjeh. ‌‌[In Persian]
    18. North, D. (2017). Fahm-e farāyand-e tahavol-e eghtesādi, Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Trans Mir Saeed Mohajerani and Zahra Farzizadeh. Tehran: Nahād’garā. ‌‌[In Persian]
    19. Payen, M; Ronde, P. (2020). “Culture, Institution and Economic Growth,” Bureau d’Économie Théorique ET Appliquée (BETA), Université de Strasbourg, France. Available at: https://beta.u-strasbg.fr/ WP/2020/2020-18.pdf (Accessed 17 November 2023).
    20. Porter, M. (2020). Farhang and toseʿ, Culture and Development: The Intertwining of Subjective and Objective Aspects of Collective Life, Trans. Farshad Momeni and Fariba Momeni. Tehran: nahād’garā. ‌‌[In Persian]
    21. Qhochani, M. (2022). Trājedi-ye protestānism-e eslāmi, Tragedy of Islamic Protestantism, Tehran: Sarāei. ‌‌[In Persian]
    22. Shojaei Divkalai, S. (2018). Toseʿ-nayāftegi and sanati’sāzi dar Īrān-e ahd-e Qājār and Pahlavi-ye avval, Underdevelopment and Industrialization in Iran in the Qajar and the First Pahlavi Era, Tehran: Tisa. ‌‌[In Persian]
    23. Tabrizi, M.Y.K (Moshir’oldoleh). (2021). Yek kalameh (A Word). Tehran: Andisheh-ye Idā. [In Persian]
    24. Tayebi Abolhasani, S.A. (2019). “Dar’āmadi bar ravesh-e tahghigh (Introduction to Research Method: Standard Procedures for Qualitative Data Analysis),” Science and Technology Policy Letters 9, 2: 67-96. Available at: https://stpl.ristip.sharif.ir/ article_21535.html? Lang=en (Accessed 24 June 2023). ‌‌[In Persian]
    25. The Comprehensive Website of Guardian Council’s Opinions, “Sāmāneh-ye jāmeʿnazarāt-e shorā-ye negahbān” (2023). The Constitutional Council (nazarat.shora-rc.ir). Available at: http://nazarat.shora-rc.ir (Accessed 24 June 2023).  ‌‌[In Persian]
    26. The Leader’s Statements at the First Meeting of Strategic Ideas, “Bayānāt-e rahbari dar nokhostin neshast-e andishe’hā-ye rāhbordi. (2010).” Office for Preservation and Publishing of the Works of Ayatollah Khamenei (farsi.khamenei.ir). Available at: https://farsi.khamenei.ir/speech-content? id=10664 ‌‌(Accessed 17 November 2023). [In Persian]
    27. United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2022). Human Development Report 2021/2022. New York: United Nations Development Program. Available at: https://hdr.undp.org/system/ files/ documents/ global-report-document/hdr2021-22pdf_1.pdf (Accessed 24 June 2023).
    28. Weber, M. (2017). Akhlāgh-e protestāni var roh-e sarmāyeh’dāri, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, T Parisa Manochehri and Abdol Karim Rashidian. Tehran: Elmi and farhangi. ‌‌[In Persian]
    29. World Bank. (2017). World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://www.world Org/en/publication/wdr2017 (Accessed 20 December 2023).
    30. World Bank. (2023). World Bank Data. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/ indicator/NY.GNP. KN? locations= IR&view= chart (Accessed 24 June 2023).
    31. Zouache, A (2016). “Islam, Institutions, Development, and the Mistakes of Orientalist Economics,” Centre de Recherches Sociologiques et Politiques de Paris (CRESPPA) Research Paper, 61-68. Available at: https:// economix.fr/uploads/source/doc/seminaires/musulman/PapZou Nanter re. pdf (Accessed 24 June 2023).
POLITICAL QUARTERLY
Volume 53, Issue 4
March 2024
Pages 817-791

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 18 August 2023
  • Revise Date: 07 February 2024
  • Accept Date: 11 March 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics