MAKING DISTINCTION TO ANALYTICAL AREAS ON DEVELOPMENT: SEVEN ANALYTICAL AREAS IN ANSWERING TO WHY HAVE COUNTRIES BEEN DEVELOPED

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Political Science, University of Yazd, Iran

Abstract

“What is cause/barrier of underdeveloped countries to achieve development
according to a model of modern industrial society?” For answering to this question,
which is one of the most famous questions of social scientist for several decades,
classifying theories about development/underdevelopment is necessary. Classifying
help us to understanding them. This paper tries to classify theories of development
by dividing all of the analytical area in issue of development/ underdevelopment.
For this perspective, most theories of development are classified in seven areas:
individual, family, market, civil society, political society, state, international system
areas. For “Individual Change and becoming Modern” Alex Inkeles (Individual as
development agent) to contemporary underdevelopment is in large part the
historical product of relations between the satellite underdeveloped and the now
developed metropolitan countries Andre Gunder Frank (international system as
development/ underdevelopment agent). All of them can be classified in these
seven analytical areas.

Keywords

References

  1. الف. فارسی:

    1. آرون، ریمون (1364) مراحل اساسی اندیشه در جامعه‌شناسی، ترجمة باقر پرهام، تهران سازمان انتشارات و آموزش انقلاب اسلامی.
    2. السید، مصطفی (1383) «محیط­های بین المللی و منطقه­ای و تحول دولت در برخی از کشورهای عرب»، در حکیمیان، حسن و زیبا مشاور، دولت و تحول جهانی: اقتصاد سیاسی گذار در خاورمیانه، ترجمه عباس حاتمی­زاده، تهران: انتشارات کویر، صص 233- 262.
    3. اینگلهارت، رونالد و کریستین ولزل (1389) نوسازی، تغییر فرهنگی و دموکراسی، ترجمه یعقوب احمدی، تهران: انتشارات کویر.
    4. ایوانز، پیتر (1380) توسعه یا چپاول: نقش دولت در تحول صنعتی، ترجمه عباس زندباف و عباس مخبر، تهران:طرح­نو.
    5. بدیع، برتران (1379) توسعه­سیاسی، ترجمه احمد نقیب‌زاده، تهران: نشر قومس.
    6. پاتنام، رابرت (1384) «جامعه برخوردار، سرمایه اجتماعی و زندگی عمومی»، در کیان تاجبخش، سرمایه اجتماعی، اعتماد، دموکراسی و توسعه، ترجمه افشین خاکباز و حسن پویان، تهران: نشر شیرازه، صص 93-112.
    7. راولز، جان (1390) قانون ­مردمان؛ به همراه «تجدید عهد با ایده دلیل­عمومی»، ترجمه­جعفر محسنی، تهران: انتشارات ققنوس.
    8. رحمانی­زاده دهکردی، حمیدرضا (1382) جامعه مدنی در دوران مدرن، تهران: انتشارات برگ زیتون.
    9. عباسی­شوازی، محمدجلال، عباس عسکری­ندوشن (1387) «آرمان­گرایی در توسعه و نگرش­های مرتبط با خانواده در ایران (مطالعه­ای موردی در شهر یزد)»،  نامه علوم اجتماعی، پائیز، شماره 34، صص 49-72.

    10.کمرفورد کوپر، مری (1384) «سازمان­های بین­المللی و ظهور دموکراسی: بررسی نتایج عضویت در گات/سازمان تجارت جهانی»، ترجمه علیرضا نامور حقیقی، در حسین بشیریه، گذار به دموکراسی (مباحث نظری)، تهران: نشر نگاه معاصر، صص 227-266.

    11.لش، اسکات (1384) جامعه شناسی پست مدرنیسم، ترجمه حسن چاوشیان، تهران: نشر مرکز.

    12.گرامشی، آنتونی (1383) دولت و جامعه مدنی، ترجمه عباس میلانی، تهران: نشر اختران.

    13.گلنر، ارنست (1382) «اهمیت انسان سازگار»، در جان ا.هال (ویراستار)، جامعه مدنی: نظریه، تاریخ و مقایسه، ترجمه افشین خاکباز، تهران: شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی، صص 33-54.

    14.موزلیس، نیکوس (1382) «تجدد، توسعه دیرهنگام و جامعه مدنی» در جان ا. هال (ویراستار)، جامعه مدنی: نظریه، تاریخ و مقایسه، ترجمه افشین خاکباز، تهران: شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی، صص 233- 258.

    15.ی. سو، آلوین (1378) تغییر اجتماعی و توسعه، ترجمه محمود حبیبی مظاهری، تهران: انتشارات پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.

    ب. خارجی

    1. Aguirre, Maria Sophia (2004) “The Family and Economic Development: Socioeconomic Relevance and Policy Design”, Doha Conference Preparatory Sessions, Geneva, Switzerland, August 23-25.
    2.  Alesina, Alberto and Paola Giuliano (2008) “Family Ties and Political Participation”, JEEA lecture, American Economic Assocition meeting, January.
    3. Banfield,Edward C.(1958) Moral Basis of a Backward Society, New York:The Free Press.
    4. Block, Fred (2008) “Swimming Against the Current: The Rise of a Hidden Developmental State in the United States”, Politics & Society, Vol. 36, No. 2, June.
    5.  Boeck, Thilo and Jennie Fleming (2005) “Social Policy- A Help or a Hindrance to Social Capital?” Social Policy and Society, Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp 259-270.
    6.  Brooker, Paul (2000) Non-Democratic Regimes: Theory, Government and Politics, Houndmills , London: Mac Millan Press Ltd.
    7.  Bunkanwanicha, Pramuan, Joseph P.H. Fan and Yupana Wiwattanakantang (2008) “The Value of Family Networks: Marriage and Network Formation in Family Business Groups”, Proceedings of the European Finance Association (EFA), Meeting, Athens, August 28-30, Athens, Greece.
    8.  Canning, David, Marc Mitchell, David Bloom, and Erin L. Kleindorfer (2013) “The Family and Economic Development”; Available online at:// http://www.scribd. com/doc/ 152621370/The-Family-and-Economic-Development-pdf
    9.  Chang, Yu-Tzung, Yun-Han Chu and Chong-Min Park (2007) “Authoritarian Nostalgia in Asian”, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 18, No. 3, July, pp. 66-80.
    10.  Cumings, Bruce (2007) “Civil Society in West and East”, in Charles K. Armstrong (ed.), Korean Society: Civil Society, Democracy and the State, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 9-32.
    11.  Diamond, Larry (1994) “Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation”, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 5, No. 3, July, pp. 4-17.
    12.  Evans, Peter B. and John D.Stephens (2005) “Development and the World Economy”, in Thomas Janosk, Robert Alford, Alexander Hicks and Mildred A.Schwartez (eds.), Handbook of Political Sociology: states, civil societies and globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, season 22.
    13. Evans, Peter B. (2001) “Development and the State”, in Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 3557- 3560.
    14. Frank, A. G. (1969) Capitalism and Under Development in Latin America, New York: Monthly Review Press.
    15. Francois, Patrick (2002) Social Capital and Economic Development, London and New York: Routledge.
    16. Garrido, C. and W. Peres (1998) ‘‘Big Latin American industrial companies and groups,’’ CEPAL Review, Vol. 66, December, pp. 129–50.
    17. Green, Andrew T. (2002) “Comparative Development of Post-Communist Civil Societies”, Europe-Asia Studies, May.
    18. Harrison, L.E. (1992) Who prospers? How cultural values shape economic and political success, New York: Basic Book.
    19.  Hernandez, Ivo (2000) “Political Reform and Economic Development: The Role of Political and Civil Society Organizations”, International IDEA.
    20.  Inoguchi, Takashi (2000) “Social Capital in Japan”, Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 1.
    21.  Jarquin, Edmundo and Koldo Echebarria (2007) “The Role of the State and politics in Latin American development (1950-2005)”, in J. Mark Payne,  Daniel Zovatto and  Mercedes Mateo Díaz (eds.), Democracies in development : politics and reform in Latin America, Washington: Harvard University.
    22.  Lowndes, Vivien and David Wilson (2001) “Social Capital and Local Governance: Exploring the institutional design variable”, Political Studies, Vol. 49, Issue 4, September, p. 629-647.
    23.  Molinas, José (2002) “The interactions of bonding, bridging and linking dimensions of social capital: evidence from rural Paraguay”, in Janathan Isham, Thomas Kelly and Sunder Ramaswamy (eds.), Social Capital and Economic Development: Well-being on Development Countries, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 104-118.
    24. Mudde, Cas (2007) “Civil Society”, in Stephen White, Judy Batt and Paul G.Lewis (eds.), Development in Central and East European Politics, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 213-228.
    25.  Pieer, Jon and B.Guy Peters (2000) Governance, Politics and State, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    26.  Rokkan, Stein (1970) Citizen, Election, Parties, N.Y: David McKayd.
    27. Sean, Sayers (1985) Reality & Reason: Dialectic and the Theory of Knowledge, New York: Basil Blackwell Inc.
    28.  Shakoori, Ali (2001) The State and Rural Development in Post-Revolutionary Iran, New York: Palgrave.
    29.  Salnykova, Anastasiya (2006) The orange revolution: A case study of democratic transition in Ukraine, Canada, Burnaby: Simon Fraser University, Department of Political Science, Spring.
    30.  Schwartz, Frank (2002) “Civil Society in Japan Reconsidered”, Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 195-215.
    31.  The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy (1993) A World Bank policy research report, Oxford University Press.
    32.  Tisdell, Clem (2009) “Economic Reform and Openness in China: China’s Development Policies in the Last 30 Years”, Economic Analysis & Policy, Vol. 39 No. 2, September, pp. 271-294.
    33.  Tusalem, Rollin F. (2007) “A Boon or a Bane? The Role of Civil Society in Third- and Fourth-Wave Democracies”, International Political Science Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 361–386.
    34.  Uphoff, N. (1993) Grassroots Organization and NGOs in Rural Development: Opportunities with Diminishing State and Expanding Markets, World Development, Vol. 21, No. 4.
    35. Wallerstein, I. (1974) The Modern World System, Vo. 1. New York: Academic Press.
    36. White, Gordon (1998) “Constructing a Democratic Developmental State”, in Mark Robinson and Gordon White (ed.), The Democratic Developmental State: Politics and Institutional Design, New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
    37. Van Til, J. (1988) Mapping the Third Sector: Voluntarism in a Changing Social Economy, New York: The Foundation Center.
POLITICAL QUARTERLY
Volume 44, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
December 2014
Pages 527-546

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 January 2014
  • Revise Date: 26 April 2015
  • Accept Date: 19 May 2014

Share

How to cite

Statistics