POLITICAL QUARTERLY

POLITICAL QUARTERLY

Quantum Transition Theory: A Strategic Framework for Conceptualizing the West’s Hybrid Warfare against the Islamic Republic of Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Research Institute of Strategic Studies (RISS), Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Imam Sadiq (A.S.) University, Tehran, Iran.
3 MA Candidate in International Relations, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction and Problem Statement
Hybrid warfare has emerged as one of the most prominent paradigms in contemporary military and strategic literature, with the Islamic Republic of Iran serving as a primary target of these multifaceted operations. Despite the growing body of literature on this subject, a significant theoretical deficit remains in providing a comprehensive framework capable of explaining the complex, fluid, and non-linear dynamics of such confrontations. To address this gap, this study examines existing hybrid warfare theories and explores their convergence with international relations paradigms. Consequently, the research seeks to answer a fundamental question: What is a valid theoretical framework for analyzing and understanding the West’s hybrid warfare against the Islamic Republic of Iran?
Research Methodology
This study is exploratory and developmental-fundamental in nature, aiming to establish a conceptual foundation for analyzing hybrid threats rather than testing empirical hypotheses. Methodologically, it adopts a qualitative approach, employing documentary analysis and descriptive-analytical methods. The data collection relies on strategic documents and academic literature, which are analyzed through the conceptual lens of systemic transitions.
Findings and Discussion
The findings indicate that a theoretically grounded understanding of hybrid warfare requires a paradigm shift from classical, linear "Newtonian" frameworks to "Quantum" models. In this quantum state, hybrid warfare operates as a non-linear phenomenon characterized by uncertainty, chaos, and systemic instability. Through this lens, the West’s strategy is seen to target the "regime of truth"—manipulating the target state’s cognitive, linguistic, and aesthetic frameworks. By utilizing cognitive biases and semantic engineering, this hybrid campaign aims to fragment the societal fabric, impose external aesthetic values, and disrupt the nation's historical and civilizational temporality.
Conclusion and Strategic Implications
The study concludes that contemporary hybrid warfare against Iran is not merely a combination of conventional and irregular tactics, but a systemic effort to reshape the national imaginary and cognitive boundaries. To counter this threat, the Islamic Republic of Iran must undergo a comprehensive re-architecting of its institutional, aesthetic, and informational structures. Rather than relying on linear historical learning, addressing these modern threats requires fostering domestic cognitive resilience and developing strategic frameworks capable of navigating chaotic, non-linear security environments.
Keywords
Subjects

References
Abend, G. (2008). The meaning of ‘theory’. Sociological theory, 26(2), 173-199.
AKGÜL, F. (2021). A Comparison between the Concepts of Gray Zone and Hybrid War: What is New for International Security?. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 17(38), 411-439.
Allori, V. (2015). Quantum mechanics and paradigm shifts. Topoi, 34(2), 313-323.
Backlund, A. (2000). The definition of system. Kybernetes. 444-451
Bakhshaesh Ardestani, A. (2009). Foucault and the theory of knowledge, power, and the regime of truth. Daneshnameh of Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, 73, 43–52. [In Persian]
Barna, C., & Dugan, C. (2016). The ukrainian hybrid warfare and neuroscience–dismantling some facets of the psychosphere. Countering Hybrid Threats: Lessons Learned from Ukraine, (128), 115-140.
Barzen, J. & Leymann, F. (2020). Quantum humanities: a vision for quantum computing in digital humanities. SICS Software-Intensive Cyber-Physical Systems, 35(1), 153-158.
Beik Bilandi, A. A., Rudgar Safari, M., Dadavand, H., Diba, M. R., & Salimi, R. (2023). A model for implementing hybrid warfare. Air Defense Management, 2(3), 47–71. [In Persian]
Bryman, A. (2010). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. Translated by Hashem Agha Bigpour. Tehran: Nashr-e Jame'e Shenasan. [In Persian]
Busemeyer, J. R., & Wang, Z. (2015). What is quantum cognition, and how is it applied to psychology?. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 163-169.
Chambers, J. (2016). Countering Gray-Zone Hybrid Threats: An Analysis of Russias" New Generation Warfare" and Implications for the US Army. US Military Academy-Modern War institute West Point United States
Cilliers, P. (2002). Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. routledge.
Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Deleuze and research methodologies. Edinburgh University Press.
Cruceru, V. (2014). On contemporary warfare: short review of specific concepts. Land Forces Academy Review, 19(3), 231-237.
Curiel, E. (2019). The many definitions of a black hole. Nature Astronomy, 3(1), 27-34.
Definition of Hybrid [online]. (2021). Oxford University Press. Available at: https: //www.lexico.com/definition/Hybrid (Accessed: 1 Nov 2021).
Dion, E. (2020). e-Thinking: Pre-Empting Global Instability in the 21st Century.
Ducaru, S. D. (2016). The cyber dimension of modern hybrid warfare and its relevance for NATO. Europolity-Continuity and Change in European Governance, 10(1), 7-23.
Dunne, T.; Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2021). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, USA.
Eftekhari, A., & Raji, M. H. (2022). Analyzing the concept of power in the complex postmodern society. Politics Quarterly, 52(2), 339–368. [In Persian]
Eidlin, F. (2015). Positivism. The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, First Edition. Edited by Michael Gibbons.
Ferrer, A. (2015). From newtonian physics to quantum theory; from new science to spiritual philosophy and wisdom: the crucial question of consciousness. Ars Brevis, (21), 92-126.
Filipec, O. (2019). Hybrid Warfare: Between Realism, Liberalism and Constructivism1. Central European Journal of Politics, 5(2), 52-70.
Flitney, A. P. & Abbott, D. (2002). An introduction to quantum game theory. Fluctuation and Noise Letters, 2(04), R175-R187.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Edited by: Colin Gordon. Translated by: Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall & John Mepham, Kate Soper. Pantheon, New York.
Ghafari Nasab, E., & Iman, M. T. (2013). Philosophical foundations of complex systems theory. Human Sciences Methodology, 76, 41–60. [In Persian]
Ghasemi, F., & Faraji, M. R. (2018). Complexity theory and foreign policy: Iran’s strategies in West Asia. Iranian Journal of International Politics, 13, 113–138. [In Persian]
Ghazizadeh, Sh., Keshishian Sirki, G., & Khodaverdi, H. (2020). The application of quantum theory in analyzing civil society in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian Political Sociology Journal, 11, 112–136. [In Persian]
Ghorbani Zovareh, M. H. (2017). The Tragedy of Fourth-Generation Warfare. Tehran: Shahid Sayad Shirazi Educational and Research Center. [In Persian]
Giegerich, B. (2016). Hybrid warfare and the changing character of conflict. Connections, 15(2), 65-72.
Grabowski, F., & Strzalka, D. (2008). Simple, complicated and complex systems-the brief introduction. In 2008 Conference On Human System Interactions. IEEE. 570-573.
Hammes, T. X. (2004). The sling and the stone: on war in the 21st century. Zenith Press.
Haven, E., & Khrennikov, A. (2013). Basic elements of quantum mechanics. In Quantum Social Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 84-101
Heelan, P. A. (1995). Quantum mechanics and the social sciences: After hermeneutics. Science & Education, 4(2), 127-136.
Hoffman, F. G. (2006). Complex irregular warfare: the next revolution in military affairs. Orbis, 50(3), 395-411.
Höne, K. E. (2017). Quantum social science. Oxford University Press.
Hosseini Shahroudi, S. M. (2009). A study and critique of quantum physics' view on the principle of causality. Islamic Philosophy Teachings Journal, 8, 33–62. [In Persian]
Huber, T. M. (2002). Compound warfare: That fatal knot. DIANE Publishing.
Kaab Omir, F., & Heydari, Gh. (2019). A bibliometric approach to revisiting the definition of theory. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems Quarterly, 6(20), 75–93. [In Persian]
Karaman, O., & Yurkiv, Y. (2020). Deformation of Personality as a Consequence of a Hybrid Warfare. Postmodern Openings/Deschideri Postmoderne, 11(1), 42-56.
Kay, L. (2016). Managing the Gray Zone is a Gray Matter Challenge. Small Wars Journal.
Khorami, Y. (2024). A multilayer modeling framework for hybrid warfare. Passive Defense, 3(59), 97–107. [In Persian]
Kim, G. & Nho, E. W. (2019). A Review of Quantum Games. Journal of Young Investigators, 37. (2)
Kuchaki Badalani, S. (2010). Analyzing hybrid threats from the perspective of modern warfare. *Strategic Defense Studies, 40, 179–208. [in Persian]
Lewis-Swan, R. J., Safavi-Naini, A., Kaufman, A. M., & Rey, A. M. (2019). Dynamics of quantum information. Nature Reviews Physics, 1(10), 627-634.
Liang, Q., & Xiangsui, W. (1999). Unrestricted warfare. Beijing. CN: PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House Arts.
Maher, R. (2021). International Relations Theory and the Future of European Integration. International Studies Review, 23(1), 89-114.
Mahmoudikia, M., & Ghorbani Sheikhneshin, A. (2018). Globalization of religion within the quantum mechanics model of international politics. International Relations Studies Quarterly, 43, 107–129. [In Persian]
Maldonado, C. (2019). Quantum Theory And The Social Sciences. Momento, (59E), 34-47.
Mann, S. R. (1992). Chaos Theory and Strategic Art. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 22(1), 19.
McCulloh, T., & Johnson, R. (2016). Hybrid Warfare. Translated by Ahmad Elhiyari & the Translation Group of Self-Sufficiency Jihad Organization under the supervision of Seyed Masoud Reza Zavare'i. Tehran: DAFOOS Press. [In Persian]
Mirza, M. N. & Babar, S. I. (2020). The Indian Hybrid Warfare Strategy: Implications for Pakistan. Progressive Research Journal of Arts and Humanities (PRJAH), 2(1), 39-52.
Mohammadi Najm, S. H. (2008). Cognitive Warfare: The Fifth Dimension of War. Tehran: Center for Future Studies in Defense Science and Technology – Defense Industries Educational and Research Institute. [In Persian]
Mohammadi, S. (2021). Translator's Note. In Korybko, A. Hybrid Wars: The Indirect Adaptive Approach to Regime Change. Translated by Sobhan Mohammadi. Tehran: Aron. [In Persian]
Mousavian, Seyed Hossein. (2015). Iran and the United States: A Failed Past and the Path to Reconciliation. Tehran: Tisa. [In Persian]
        Nissen, T. E. (2015). TheWeaponizationOfSocialMedia: Characteristics of Contemporary Conflicts. Royal Danish Defence College.
Pakinghorn, J. (2019). Quantum Theory. Translated by Hossein Masoumi Hamadani. Tehran: Farhang-e Mo'aser. [In Persian]
Palmer, C. L. (1999). Structures and strategies of interdisciplinary science. Journal of the American society for information science, 50(3), 242-253.
Pocheptsov, G. (2018). Cognitive attacks in Russian hybrid warfare. Information & Security, (41), 37-43.
Pothos, E. M. & Busemeyer, J. R. (2021). Quantum Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology. (73).
Rabinowitz, M. (2008). Is Quantum Mechanics Incompatible with Newton’s First Law?. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 47(4), 936-948. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10773-007-9519-7 (Accessed june 2021)
Raji, M. H., & Eftekhari, A. (2019). The West’s hybrid war against the Islamic Republic of Iran: An analysis of dimensions and methods. Defensive Politics Journal, 109, 75–111. [In Persian]
Raji, M. H., & Gohari Moghadam, A. (2022). A quantum-based framework for political science. Strategic Policy Studies, 11(41), 85–121. [In Persian]
Riazi, V., Akbari, A., Bajelani, S., & Akbari, H. R. (2021). Introducing components and tools of U.S. hybrid warfare against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Defensive Strategy, 19(1), 37–67. [In Persian]
Sarjito, A. (2024). Countering Hybrid Threats: Challenges and the Role of Defense Science. PUBLICNESS: Journal of Public Administration Studies.
Saroukhani, B., & Sadeghi Pour, Sh. (2014). Research Methods in Social Sciences (Fuzzy Method). Vol. 4. Tehran: Didar Publishing. [In Persian]
Song, S. J. (2016). Conceptualizing the'Hybrid Warfare'. The Journal of Military Studies, 83-108.
Stapp, H. P. (1999). Attention, intention, and will in quantum physics. Journal of Consciousness studies, 6(8-9), 143-143.
Sterman, J. D. (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. System dynamics review, 10 (2‐3), 291-330.
Sterman, J. D. (2018). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Translated by Kourosh Bararpour, Parisa Mousavi Ahranjani, Banafshe Behzad, Marzieh Emami, Laleh Rezaei Adl, Hassan Faghani. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]
Turner, J. R., & Baker, R. M. (2019). Complexity theory: An overview with potential applications for the social sciences. Systems, 7(1), 4.
Veljovski, G., Taneski, N., & Dojchinovski, M. (2017). The danger of “hybrid warfare” from a sophisticated adversary: the Russian “hybridity” in the Ukrainian conflict. Defense & Security Analysis, 33(4), 292-307.
Weir, L. (2008). The concept of truth regime. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 33. (2)
Wendt, A. (2015). Quantum mind and social science. Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, A. (2019). Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Translated by Elham Heydari. Tehran: Elm Publishing. [In Persian]
Wilson III, I., & Smitson, S. A. (2020). The Compound Security Dilemma: Threats at the Nexus of War and Peace. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 50(2), 3.
Wright, N. D. (2017). From control to influence: Cognition in the Grey Zone.
Zadeh, L., & Desoer, C. (2008). Linear system theory: the state space approach. Courier Dover Publications.
Zhou, H. (2018). An Introduction of Cognitive Electronic Warfare System. In International Conference in Communications, Signal Processing, and Systems .Springer, Singapore. 1202-1210.
Volume 56, Issue 3
Summer 2026
Pages 779-751

  • Receive Date 11 October 2025
  • Revise Date 07 February 2026
  • Accept Date 13 April 2026