چالش‌ها و نقش‌های جدید سیاست خارجی بریتانیا در دوران پسابرگزیت

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار روابط بین‌الملل، دانشکدۀ اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین‌الملل، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

این مقاله با بهره‌گیری از نظریۀ نقش، به بررسی سیاست خارجی بریتانیا پس از برگزیت و تلاش این کشور برای تعریف جایگاه جدید خود در نظام بین‌الملل می‌پردازد. برگزیت به‌عنوان یک تحول اساسی، چالش‌های متعددی را در سیاست داخلی و خارجی بریتانیا ایجاد کرده و فشار زیادی بر ظرفیت‌های دیپلماتیک، اداری و راهبردی آن وارد ساخته است. پرسش اصلی پژوهش آن است که سیاست خارجی بریتانیا در دورۀ پسابرگزیت با چه چالش‌ها و نقش‌های جدیدی مواجه است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که بریتانیا همچنان در مسیر تدوین راهبردی منسجم در سیاست خارجی قرار دارد. مهم‌ترین چالش‌های پیش‌روی این کشور شامل کاهش نفوذ در نهادهای سیاستگذاری اتحادیۀ اروپا، محدودیت در اعمال تحریم‌ها، حذف از فرایندهای تصمیم‌گیری کلان در اتحادیۀ اروپا، تغییر در برداشت جهانی از موقعیت بریتانیا و کاهش مشروعیت بین‌المللی آن است. در این چارچوب، بریتانیا برای جلوگیری از انزوا و حفظ جایگاه خود در نظام بین‌الملل، همزمان شش نقش کلیدی را دنبال می‌کند: «تلاش برای دوری از انزواطلبی، دولت تجاری جهانی متحد راهبردی ایالات متحده، بازسازی جایگاه به‌عنوان یک قدرت بزرگ جهانی، شریک منطقه‌ای اتحادیۀ اروپا، و رهبر کشورهای مشترک‌المنافع». این پژوهش با هدف تحلیل چالش‌ها و نقش‌های نوین سیاست خارجی بریتانیا در دوران پسابرگزیت، با رویکردی کیفی و بهره‌گیری از روش تحلیل نظری انجام گرفته است. داده‌های پژوهش از طریق منابع مکتوب، اسناد رسمی و گزارش‌های معتبر گردآوری شده‌ است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Challenges and New Roles of British Foreign Policy in the Post-Brexit Era

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Rahmati 1
  • Hossein Emamverdi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
2 PhD Student, Department of International Relations, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The United Kingdom's decision to leave the European Union, known as "Brexit," represents one of the most significant geopolitical developments of the 21st century, with profound implications for its internal structure and international position. Since the UK's accession to the European Economic Community in 1973, reservations regarding deeper European integration have persisted in both domestic and foreign policy. Brexit can be viewed as the culmination of this historical divide, resulting in the country's departure from one of the world's most important economic and political unions.
Initial analyses focused primarily on domestic consequences, particularly in economic, trade, and social sectors. Over time, however, broader effects on foreign policy and the UK's standing in international institutions such as the United Nations, NATO, the G7, and the G20 have become more evident. Leaving the European Union not only altered the UK's relationships with European nations but also presented the challenge of redefining its role within the international system. Consequently, UK foreign policy in the post-Brexit era stands at a critical juncture. While supporters emphasized regaining national sovereignty, international realities present numerous challenges to maintaining global influence. The most significant of these is redefining the UK's international position without the benefits of EU membership. Furthermore, amid growing competition among major powers and the rise of emerging actors, the UK is compelled to adopt new foreign policy strategies, necessitating an adjustment of relations with the United States, China, the European Union, and Commonwealth countries.
This analysis of the UK's post-Brexit foreign policy can be framed within Role Theory. This theory assumes that states adopt specific international roles based on the perceptions of their political elites, the expectations of other international actors, and structural changes. Leaving the European Union necessitates a redefinition of these roles for the UK, which can no longer act as a key EU player and must therefore build new alliances and redesign its foreign policy.
Accordingly, this study addresses the fundamental question: what new challenges and roles does the UK's foreign policy face in the post-Brexit era? The research framework will first explain Role Theory in Foreign Policy. It will then examine the core challenges confronting the UK and analyze its strategies for redefining its role within the post-Brexit international order.
 

Theoretical and Conceptual Framework

The theoretical framework of this study is grounded in Foreign Policy Role Theory, which analyzes a state's position within the international system based on internal perceptions, external expectations, and the social structures of international interactions. This theory posits the "national role" as a key element of foreign policy, encompassing a state's understanding of its position and the expectations other international actors hold for it. According to this approach, a country’s foreign policy role is not merely a reflection of internal, historical perceptions of national identity but is also shaped dynamically through interaction with other actors and influenced by international institutions and structures.
Within this framework, the concept of "role prescriptions" is particularly important. These prescriptions refer to the set of expectations and norms imposed on a state by both domestic and international actors, which play a central role in defining and implementing its foreign policy. They can originate from international institutions, regional coalitions, or public opinion, thereby directly influencing the state’s international behavior. From this perspective, the United Kingdom's departure from the European Union represents a profound structural transformation that has necessitated a redefinition of its international role. Brexit has altered the UK’s institutional and geopolitical position, subjecting it to new domestic and international expectations and pressures. Consequently, the UK is compelled to redefine its national role and adjust its foreign relations to stabilize its position within the international system. This redefinition process is influenced by factors such as the expectations of international actors, national power resources, and role socialization. Therefore, the UK’s post-Brexit foreign policy can be analyzed through the interplay of internal role perceptions, the requirements of the international system, and the new strategic choices the country adopts.
 

Methodology

This research employs a qualitative methodology with an explanatory-analytical approach to examine the United Kingdom's role and position in international politics following Brexit. The study utilizes document analysis as its primary data collection method to understand the redefinition of the UK's national role and its foreign policy requirements. Data was gathered through a comprehensive review of written sources, including books, scholarly articles, credible reports, and reliable online publications. The selection of sources was guided by their academic credibility and direct relevance to the research topic, ensuring a substantiated analysis of the changes in the UK's international role. By employing this method, the research aims to provide an accurate picture of the challenges and opportunities facing the UK in the post-Brexit era, examining official documents and conducting a discourse analysis of foreign policy statements. This approach facilitates an understanding of the processes of national role formation and redefinition within the framework of Foreign Policy Role Theory. It thereby contributes to identifying the key components influencing the UK’s foreign policy in the new global context.
 

Results and Findings

After the Brexit, the United Kingdom has faced a series of complex challenges in its foreign policy. These developments have not only had profound impacts on the country’s domestic and economic relations, but they have also led to the redefinition of its role in the international system. Brexit has presented significant challenges in the economic, defense, and diplomatic domains, compelling the UK to develop new strategic approaches. The following five key challenges are central to the post-Brexit landscape:

Complexities of the Brexit Negotiations: The negotiations themselves constituted one of the UK's most challenging diplomatic processes, impacting its relations with the European Union and its broader international standing. This arduous process required the renegotiation of over 750 international agreements, an undertaking that significantly strained diplomatic resources and diminished the UK's collective bargaining power.
Reduced Influence in EU Foreign Policy Institutions: Following its departure, the UK was excluded from the European Union's central foreign policy frameworks, such as the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the Political and Security Committee. This exclusion has reduced its capacity to coordinate international policies and participate in collective decision-making on a wide range of global issues.
Challenges in Designing and Implementing Independent Sanctions: While the UK can now act autonomously, it faces the challenge of designing and imposing independent sanctions without the collective weight of the EU. Whereas it previously played a leading role within the EU's sanctions regime, it now must establish the legal authority and practical efficacy of its unilateral measures, which may carry less influence.
Absence from the EU Key Decision-Making Processes: The UK’s departure resulted in its absence from critical EU decision-making processes, particularly in security and defense. This lack of access limits its ability to shape policies that directly affect European security and, by extension, its own national interests.
Changes in Global Perception and Declining International Legitimacy: Exiting a major multilateral body like the EU could be perceived as a step away from collective global engagement. This perception risks diminishing the UK's international legitimacy and soft power, potentially affecting its trade negotiations and political influence on the world stage.
These challenges collectively define the complex environment in which post-Brexit UK foreign policy must operate.

Following Brexit, the United Kingdom has been actively striving to redefine its role in global politics. Confronted with the significant challenges of leaving the European Union, the UK aims to leverage new opportunities to maintain its global influence. These efforts involve creating independent and flexible strategies across various domains, crystallizing around six key roles:

Efforts to Avoid Isolationism: The UK is consciously working to counter any perception of isolationism following its EU exit. It seeks to project an image as an active, key player in global politics by strengthening diplomatic and trade relations with various nations. This approach focuses particularly on enhancing cooperation in global economic and security affairs to sustain its position as a global power.
'Global Britain' as a Trade Nation: A central post-Brexit strategy is the "Global Britain" agenda, which aims to establish the UK as an independent "global trade nation." This involves designing and implementing trade policies free from the EU, creating new opportunities for bilateral and multilateral economic cooperation worldwide to reinforce its status as a global trading power.
Rebuilding Its Position as a Great Power: The UK is seeking to reclaim its stature as a "great global power" within the international system. Efforts are concentrated on military, economic, and diplomatic fields, utilizing strengthened military resources, active NATO participation, and involvement in global security operations to demonstrate its determination to maintain influence in global defense.
Regional Partner to the European Union: Despite its departure, the UK aims to become a "regional partner" to the EU. This strategy focuses on maintaining close economic and security ties through new strategic partnerships and bilateral cooperation, positioning the UK as the EU's "strongest friend and partner," especially in trade, security, and judicial matters.
Leader of the Commonwealth of Nations: The UK is working to assume a strengthened leadership role within the Commonwealth. This strategy is designed to enhance diplomatic and economic relations with key member countries like Australia, Canada, India, and South Africa. Through official visits and emphasizing strategic importance, the UK seeks to forge new trade partnerships and aims to become the largest G7 investor in Africa.
Loyal Ally of the United States: Post-Brexit, the UK is focused on reinforcing its "special relationship" with the United States, casting itself as a "loyal ally." British and American officials have consistently emphasized that this vital partnership will not only endure but expand following the UK's departure from the European Union.

 

Conclusion

This study concludes that in the wake of Brexit, the United Kingdom is actively redefining its international position, focusing on rebuilding and strengthening its global foreign policy roles. Its departure from the European Union has presented significant challenges, including the complexities of the withdrawal negotiations, diminished influence within EU institutions, the need to design independent sanctions, exclusion from key EU decision-making processes, and a perceived decline in global legitimacy. These challenges have compelled the UK to adopt new strategic approaches to preserve and enhance its international standing.
In this context, UK policy has prioritized avoiding isolationism and strengthening bilateral diplomatic relations. The "Global Britain" strategy, aimed at establishing the nation as an independent global trade power, is a central pillar of this effort, focusing on new economic agreements beyond Europe. Concurrently, the UK seeks to bolster its status as a great global power through active engagement in security and geopolitical matters, including enhanced defense cooperation.
The UK also aims to maintain a close and effective relationship with the European Union as a "regional partner," leveraging the security and economic benefits of this tie. Leadership within the Commonwealth of Nations presents another avenue for expanding geopolitical influence. Furthermore, reinforcing its position as a "loyal ally" of the United States, particularly in security and defense, remains a key foreign policy priority.
The ultimate success of these strategies depends on the UK's ability to adeptly manage domestic and international challenges, strike a balance between strategic independence and reliance on key partners, and strengthen its diplomatic and economic legitimacy. The future of UK foreign policy will therefore be determined by its success in adapting to the new international order and effectively capitalizing on strategic opportunities to cement its redefined roles on the global stage.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Britain
  • Brexit
  • Challenges
  • Foreign Policy
  • New Roles
References
Aggestam, L. (2006). Role theory and European foreign policy: A framework of analysis. In O. Elgström & M. Smith (Eds.), The European Union’s roles in international politics: Concepts and analysis (pp. 11–29). Routledge.
BBC. (2017, June 22). Chagos legal status sent to international court by UN. BBC News. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40376673
Benes, M. (2011). Role theory in social work in the context of gender stereotypes. https://www.academia.edu/810501/Role_theory_in_the_social_work_in_the_context_of_gender_stereotypes
Cooper, A., & Blake, J. (2022). Brexit and the transatlantic relationship: Challenges and adaptations. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24(3), 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481221048901
Dunlop, C. (2021). Brexit and the decline of British foreign policy influence: A critical assessment. European Journal of International Relations, 27(3), 489–507.
European Commission. (2017, December 8). Communication from the Commission to the European Council (Article 50). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/betapolitical/files/1_en_act_communication.pdf
Financial Times. (2016, June 26). UK-US special relationship shaky following Brexit vote. https://www.ft.com/content/0c71dc88-3b8b-11e6-9f2c-36b487ebd80a
Hadfield, A. (2018). Britain against the world? Foreign and security policy in the age of Brexit. International Affairs, 94(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix251
Harold, R. (2023). Postcolonial British foreign policy and the geopolitics of post-Brexit engagement. International Relations, 37(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178231123456
Harnisch, S. (2011, February). Conceptualizing in the minefield: Role theory and foreign policy learning. Paper presented at the ISA Workshop Integrating Foreign Policy Analysis and International Relations through Role Theory, New Orleans.
Hill, C. (2019). The future of British foreign policy: From confusion to strategy. The Political Quarterly, 90(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1467-923X.12673
Holsti, K. J. (1970). National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 233–309.
House of Commons. (2014, January 7). FCO performance and finances 2012–13: Sixth report of session 2013–14. The Stationery Office.
House of Lords. (2017, July 6). Select Committee on the European Union External Affairs Sub-Committee, Oral evidence - Common Foreign and Security Policy after Brexit. [URL needed]
Jacobs, T. (2023). Brexit and the transformation of national sovereignty in UK foreign policy. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 31(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.XXXXXX
Johnson, B. (2018, December 9). Foreign Secretary speech: ‘Britain is back East of Suez’. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/foreign-secretary-speech-britain-is-backeast-of-suez
Kelly, D., & Smith, M. (2020). Brexit and Britain's position in international institutions. Global Policy, 11(S2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12781
Leahy, P., & Minihan, M. (2017, July 29). Varadkar’s comments on Brexit are a sharp message to London. The Irish Times. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/varadkar-s-commentson-brexit-are-a-sharp-message-to-london-1.3170367
Martill, B., & Staiger, U. (2020). Brexit and the future of UK foreign policy: Continuity versus change. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(3), 588–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13031
Martill, B., & Sus, M. (2018). Post-Brexit EU/UK security cooperation: NATO, CSDP+, or ‘French connection’?. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20 (4), 846–863.
May, T. (2016, November 7). India-UK Tech Summit: Prime Minister’s speech. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/india-uk-tech-summit-prime-ministers-speech
May, T. (2017, January 19). Speech to the World Economic Forum in Davos. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/davos-2017-prime-ministers-speech-to-the-world-economic-forum
May, T. (2017, January 26). Prime Minister’s speech to the Republican Party conference 2017. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/prime-ministers-speech-to-the-republican-party-conference-2017
McLean, P. (2017, May 30). After Brexit: The UK will need to renegotiate at least 759 treaties. The Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/ f1435a8e-372b-11e7-bce4-9023f8c0fd2e
Melvin, N., & Chalmers, M. (2020). The United Kingdom and the future of European security, peace, and security. ISBN 978-3-96250-692-6.
Mogherini, F. (2016, January 14). Oral evidence: Costs and benefits of EU membership for the UK’s role in the world, HC 545, Q275.
Murray-Evans, P. (2017, July 30). How Brexit could harm African economies that trade with the UK and disrupt regional integration. LSE British Politics and Policy Blog. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/ brexit-risks-and-african-trade
New York Times. (2017, June 6). Britain’s voyage to inglorious isolation. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/06/ opinion/ britains-voyage-to-inglorious-isolation.html
Oliver, T. (2013). Europe without Britain: Assessing the impact on the European Union of a British withdrawal. SWP Research Paper, 5–30.
Oliver, T. (2016). European and international views of Brexit. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1321–1328.
Oliver, T., & Williams, M. J. (2016). Special relationship in flux: Brexit and the future of the US-EU and US-UK relationships. International Affairs, 92(3), 547–567.
Scotland, P. (2016). The Commonwealth’s role in a changing world. Commonwealth Secretariat.
Skadden, A., Slate, M., & Flom, L. (2021). Impact of Brexit on UK and EU sanctions frameworks. One Manhattan West, New York, NY 10001.
Stryker, S., & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., 225–248).
Thies, C. G. (2011). Role theory and foreign policy. Forthcoming, International Studies Association Compendium Project. http://www.isanet.org/compendium_sections/2007/06/foreign_policy_html
Turnbull, M. (2016). Australia and the UK: A shared future in a post-Brexit world. Australian Government Publications.
Usherwood, S. (2017, July 20). The political and reputational costs of no-deal. Politics @ Surrey Blog. http://blogs.surrey.ac.uk/politics/2017/07/ 20/political-and-reputational-costs-of-nodeal/
Whitman, R. G. (2021a). Global Britain in a competitive age: An assessment of the Integrated Review. International Affairs, 97(5), 1267–1285. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab123
Whitman, R. G. (2021b). The UK and EU foreign, security and defence policy after Brexit: Integrated, associated or detached?. International Affairs, 97(6), 1753–176
Wish, N. B. (1987). National attributes as sources of national role conceptions. In S. G. Walker (Ed.), Role theory and foreign policy analysis (pp. 94–103).