نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشیار سیاستگذاری، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه فرماندهی و ستاد ارتش، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Introduction
Political integration and national unification are two sides of the nation-building coin. To achieve these goals, citizens and the government must transcend ethnic distinctions and establish mutual political relations. In this way, ethnic majorities and minorities are incorporated into the overall configuration of power and become integrated with one another. When citizens and the government establish relationships based on authority and support, an inclusive national community is formed, and nation-building can be said to have borne fruit. According to this research, nation-building in contemporary Iran rests on three variables: the architecture of military buildings, epic music, and the language of military communication. The current study explores the relationship between these three variables and the formation of nation-building in Iran. The subject of this scientific inquiry is nation-building in the modern sense, which is being analyzed here. The research hypothesis is as follows: "the architecture of military buildings, military communication language, and epic music have contributed to the nation-building process in Iran by producing inclusive and socially convergent values and meanings." The theoretical framework of the research is drawn from Karl Deutsch's theory of national integration, emphasizing the development of cultural integration and the consolidation of social communication. The research method is explanatory and causal in nature, illustrating how the production of meaning and the emergence of a nationalist spirit are shaped by these three factors. The method of collecting materials is library-based. The innovation of this research lies in its exploration of the important process of nation-building in Iran by focusing on the institution of the modern army and variables such as the architecture of military buildings and barracks, the language of military communication, and epic music and its associated rituals.
Methodology
This research aims to explain how the nation-building process has unfolded in Iran since 1925. The researcher studies the impact of three variables—"architecture of military buildings," "military communication language," and "epic music," along with associated rituals—on this process. The research adopts Max Weber’s post-empirical approach. According to this perspective, any knowledge that seeks to explain the causal relationships between socio-cultural phenomena is inherently valuable. Thus, claims of discovery without assuming causal relationships are considered illogical and impossible. Causality, in this view, represents a value-laden relationship, meaning causal attribution stems from the researcher’s theoretical orientation and is independent of the subject itself. For Weber, a high correlation between two variables alone is insufficient to prove a causal link; rather, it is necessary to demonstrate that the relationship is meaningful. According to this research, the architecture of military buildings, military communication language, and epic music—along with the rituals of military units—have influenced the audience's mental perception of diverse ethnicities, dialects, and social groups across the country, thereby producing the meaning of the nation in its modern sense. The integration of ethnic cultures and the consolidation of social connections are explained in this study using an interpretive method as outcomes of the converging effects of two variables: the architecture of military buildings and the epic music of the army.
Result and discussion
A nation is formed within the context of a place called the homeland. Throughout Iranian history, military garrisons have played an important role in establishing authority over territorial geography through multiple political, military, and economic functions. Indeed, place—the homeland—is a fundamental component of nation-building. Nations cultivate an identity that aligns with the climate and geography of their homeland. Within this geographic sphere, the people engage in the construction and architecture of buildings. The rulers of society attach great importance to the architecture of military sites, including the towers and ramparts of their garrisons. Military architecture influences the production and projection of power into the social environment; it shapes the emotional, physical, and lived experience of citizens. A military garrison functions as a living organism, understood within a network of relationships with other places, human activities, and cultural sites.
In this way, military architecture unconsciously serves as a reference for the formation of national identity. The combination of the three components—“rituals, music, and place”—constitutes one of the significant sources of the nation-building process in Iran. It appears that epic military rituals and music draw upon the culture of sacrifice rooted in Ashura and the epic poetry of the Shahnameh. These rituals play an important role in redefining the concept of homeland through the mythological values of both ancient and Islamic Iran. Military communication language is a crucial factor in Iranian nationalization. Military culture, in all its dimensions, cannot be produced or transmitted to future generations without a specific language of communication. The linguistic meanings embedded within military discourse carry the national worldview and culture, as well as the organizational culture, and also convey the historical and epic experiences of the institution. Due to its distinct capabilities and structure, the language of military communication equips its speakers with the ability to understand, classify, recognize, and interpret the national environment.
Conclusion
Nation-building in Iran, as an unfinished process whose development and formulation is essential to the public good and national interests must remain a central concern of the government. In this regard, a crucial dimension of nation-building is reliance on institutions. The institution of the army, as this research has explained, has played a unique role in Iran's nation-building process. Therefore, the following institutional and executive proposals are offered for the army organization in line with advancing this process:
The government should preserve and reconstruct the architecture of military buildings within Iranian cities as a form of national cultural heritage and as an active element of nation-building within urban spaces.
Nation-building and nationally unifying values and norms should be intentionally integrated into the language of military communication. In this regard, the phrase "Javid Iran" ("Long Live Iran") should be adopted as a communicative element among personnel and incorporated as part of the military salute in rituals, ceremonies, and formal communications.
کلیدواژهها [English]