تأثیر ترجمه آثار موریس دوورژه بر نظریه حقوق اساسی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران

چکیده

موریس دوورژه، از استادان حقوق ‌اساسی و علوم ‌سیاسی فرانسه در دهه 1950 تا 1970 بود که تأثیر بسیاری بر فضای فکری حقوق ‌اساسی و علوم‌ سیاسی گذاشت. آوازه او از مرزهای فرانسه گذشته و به ‌اسپانیا، امریکا و ایران هم رسیده بود. در ایران، ابوالفضل قاضی، استاد حقوق‌ اساسی دانشگاه تهران، دو کتاب از وی را به ‌فارسی برگرداند، همچنین در کتابی که در حقوق ‌اساسی نوشت، از او بسیار تأثیر پذیرفت. امروزه در تاریخ اندیشه حقو ق‌اساسی فرانسه پژوهش‌هایی انجام گرفته که تأثیر سوء مکتب دوورژه را بررسی کرده است؛ این پژوهش‌ها بر برخی زوایای فکر دوورژه پرتو انداخته‌اند که نتایج آن می‌تواند در حقوق ‌اساسی و علوم‌ سیاسی ایران هم درست باشد. هدف اصلی این مقاله یافتن پاسخ‌های مناسب به دو پرسش پژوهشی زیر است: 1. ترجمه آثار دوورژه بر نظریه حقوق اساسی ایران چه تأثیری داشته است؟ و 2. ترجمه این آثار چه پیامدهایی در حقوق اساسی ایران داشته است؟ از روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی مضمونی مهم‌ترین آثار دوورژه و ابوالفضل قاضی استفاده شد. در فرضیه پژوهشی استدلال می‌شود که ترجمه آثار دوورژه تأثیری منفی بر مطالعات حقوق اساسی ایران داشته است. یکی از پژوهش‌هایی که جای آن در نظریه حقوق ‌اساسی و علوم‌ سیاسی ایران خالی است، تأملاتی درباره تلاش‌های استادان پیش‌کسوت، و بازبینی و بازرسی راهی است که ایشان طی کرده‌اند تا از این راه بتوان بحث‌های حقوق‌ اساسی را تجدید کرد. یافته‌های اصلی این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که حقوق اساسی ایران هم چنان ذیل التقاطی که ابوالفضل قاضی از روش دوورژه کرده، ادامه دارد، و نتوانسته است راه خود را پیدا کند. همچنین به‌ ضرورت ترمیم پیوند میان حقوق ‌اساسی و علوم ‌سیاسی به‌عنوان یکی از راه‌های بازسازی حقوق اساسی توجه شده است تا از این راه به ‌احیا و اصلاح پیوندهای این دو حوزه دانش، از سوی اهل آن، اندیشیده شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Maurice Duverger’s Translated Works on Iran’s Constitutional Theory

نویسنده [English]

  • Naser Soltani
Assistant Professor of Public Law, Faculty of Law, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qum, Iran
چکیده [English]

Maurice Duverger was a French political scientist and professor of constitutional law in the 1950s-1970s, and greatly influenced the intellectual climate of constitutional law and political science. His fame spread abroad throughout Europe, North America and Asia, and his books and articles became known to thinkers and students in a score of countries as diverse as Iran, the U.S., and Spain. Duverghe stood between these two academic disciplines and tried to establish a link between them. Abolfazl Qazi, a constitutional law professor at the University of Tehran undertook the task of translating some of Duverger’s books into Persian, e.g., Institutions politiques et Droit constitutionnel (Constitutional Rights and Political Institutions), and Sociologie politique (Political Sociology). He also wrote a book which was clearly and significantly influenced by the French scholar’s writings on the subject of constitutional law. Nowadays, research conducted on the history of French constitutional thought have been analyzing the negative impact of Duverger’ school of thought. The important narrative that he presented about political institutions, for example, his discussions of ‘semi-authoritarian system’ and ‘semi-parliamentarism’ has been gradually forgotten. At the end of the 1970s, a slow but significant change in political science was taking place as the result of the systematic and comprehensive use of methods and theories of sociology and history by political scientists, and the growing value of collaborative research, empirical analyses and multidisciplinary scholarly efforts to discuss and analyze issues. This change turned Maurice Duverge into a historical figure who belonged to an obsolete and pre-scientific period. This "new" political science was not exclusively interested in the same issues that were of concern for Duverge such as voting. behavior and political parties. Instead, the attention somehow turned to exploring how politics can draw inspiration from other disciplines and encourage collaboration, elaboration, and evaluation.
The results of the recent studies which have critically examined Duverger’s writings might also apply to the discussions of Iranian Constitutional theory. The main objective of this article is to find suitable answers to the following research questions: a) How have Duverger's works influenced Iran’s theory of constitutional rights? and b) What consequences have these works had on research concerning constitutional rights in Iran? Using the qualitative content analysis method, the most significant works of Duverger and Abolfazl Ghazi are examined in order to answer these questions. In the research hypothesis, the author claims that Ghazi’s translations of Duverger’s books have had a negative impact on the studies of constitutional law in Iran. The main findings indicate that the studies of constitutional rights in Iran are still under the influence of Abolfazl Ghazi’s work which had been in part influenced by Maurice Duverger's thought. These studies have been diverted from the right course and have not found its way. Thus, Iranian scholars and leading experts must pay closer attention to the link between constitutional rights and political science as two imperative fields of knowledge.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Abolfazl Qazi
  • Constitutional Law
  • Maurice Duverger
  • Political Sciences
  • Political Sociology
  1. References

    1. Ackerman, B. (2020). Tafkik-e ghovā-ye jadid (New Separation of Powers), trans. Hassan Vakilian. Tehran: Negah-e moʿāser. [In Persian]
    1. Arnaud, A.J. (1975). Les Juristes Face à la Société du XIXe Siècle à nos Jours. Paris: Presses universitaires de France (PUF). [In French]
    2. Aron, R. (1983). Mémoires. Paris: Julliard. [In French]

    4.Burdea, G. (1956). “Une Survivance: la Notion de Constitution,” à Achille Mestre, ed.  L’évolution du Droit Public. Études Offertes. Paris: Sirey. [In French]

    5.Burdeau, G. (1959). Méthode de la Science Politique.  Paris: Dalloz. [In French]

    6.Burdeau, G. (1980). Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques. Paris: Les cours de droit. [In French]

    7.Chevallier, J.J. (1965). “Destin de la science politique,” Revue de l’enseignement supérieur 4, p. 8. [In French]

    8.Cox, G.W. (1997). Making Votes Count. Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    9.Dorandeu, R. (1990). “Maurice Duverger: un Professeur dans Le Monde,” Congrès de l’AFC, Strasbourg. [In French]

    10.Duverger, M.  (1970). "Du chehreh-ye Janos: mafhom-e siyāsat, The Two Faces of Janus: The Concept of Politics," trans. Abulfazl Ghazi. Negin Magazine 59: 8-7. Available at: https://www.noormags. Ir/view/fa/articlepage/642027 (Accessed November 27, 1402). [In Persian]

    11.Duverger, M.  (1973). Osool-e elm-e siyāsat (Principles of Political Science, trans. Abulfazl Ghazi. Tehran: Pocket Books Co. [In Persian]

    1. Duverger, M. (1948). Manuel de Droit Constitutionnel et de Science Politique. Paris: PUF, 5th [In French]

    13.Duverger, M. (1959a). “L’analyse Stratégiste Comme Méthode de Recherche en Science Politique,” Colloque Science Politique et Sociologie, Grenoble, 11-12 juin. [In French]

    14.Duverger, M. (1959b). La Cinquième République.  Paris: PUF. [In French]

    15.Duverger, M. (1959c). Méthodes de la Science Politique. Paris: PUF. [In French]

    1. Duverger, M. (1965). “De la Science Politique Considérée Comme Mystification,” Revue de l’Enseignement Supérieur 4 : 13-22. [In French]

    17.Duverger, M. (1969). "Ravan’kavi and siyāsat, Psychoanalysis and Politics," trans. Abulfazl Ghazi. Negin Magazine 58: 2, 42 and 85. Available at: https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/641999 (Accessed 18 November 1402). [In Persian]

    18.Duverger, M. (1975). Regim’hā-ye siyāsi, Political Regimes, trans. Nasser Sadr al-Hafazi. Tehran: Iran Books Printing and Publications. [In Persian]

    19.Duverger, M. (1982). “Les vaches sacrées,” in Léo Hamon, ed. Itinéraires. Études en l’honneur. Paris: Economica. [In French]

    20.Duverger, M. (1986). Les Régimes Semi-présidentiels (Semi-Presidential Regimes). Paris: PUF. [In French]

    1. Duverger, M. (1987). Échec au Roi. Paris: Albin Michel. [In French]

    22.Duverger, M. (1993). Jāmeʿeh’shenāsi siāsi, Political Sociology, trans. Abulfazl Qazi Shariatpanahi. Tehran: University of Tehran, 2nd ed. [In Persian]

    1. Favoreu, L. (1984). "Propos d’un Néo-Constitutionnaliste," in Jean-Louis Seurin, ed. Le constitutionnalisme aujourd’hui. Paris: Economica. [In French]
    2. Favoreu, L. (1988). La politique saisie par le droit. Paris: Economica. [In French]
    3. François, B. (1993a). “Du Juridictionnel au Juridique,” in Jean-Jacques Chevallier, ed. Droit et Politique. Paris: PUF. [In French]
    4. François, B. (1993b). “La constitution du droit? La doctrine constitutionnelle à la recherche d’une légitimité juridique et d’un horizon pratique, » in Yves Poirmeur and Alain Bernard. La Doctrine juridique. Paris: PUF, 210-229. [In French]

    27.François, B. (2010). “Maurice Duverger, La Gloire Avant L’oubli (en France),” Revue Internationale de Politique 17, 1 : 23-38, <DOI:10.3917/ripc.171.0023>. Available at: https://www.cairn. Info/ revue-internationale-de-politique-comparee-2010-1-page-23. htm (Accessed 2 October 2018). [In French]

    28.Gatti-Montain, J. (1986). “Le Droit et Son Enseignement: Un Demi-siècle de Réflexions,” Droits 4 : 109-122. [In French]

    1. Gurvitch, G. (1960). Traité de Sociologie, dir. Revue Française de Sociologie, Paris: PUF, 2 vol. [In French]
    2. Lavau, (1965). “La science politique et les cadres universitaires,” Revue de l’enseignement supérieur 4: 143-154. [In French]
    3. Lavau, (1969). AFSP, Entretiens du samedi, n°10, “L’état de la science politique en France,” Mars. [In French]

    32.Lochak, D. (1989). “La Doctrine sous Vichy ou les Mésaventures du Positivisme,” in Danièle Lochak, ed. Les Usages Sociaux du Droit. Paris: CURAPP-Presses universitaires de France, 252-285. [In French]

    33.De Merny, G. (2019). Dars’hā-ye hoghogh-e edāri dar madresseh-ye siyāsi, Administrative Law Lessons in the Political School, trans. Mirza Abdollah Khan, ed. Seyed Naser Soltani. Tehran: Negah-e moʿāser. [In Persian]

    1. Parodi, L. (1972). Les Rapports Entre Le Législatif et L'exécutif Sous la V e République 1958-1962. Paris: Armand Colin. [In French]

    35.Qazi Shariatpanahi, A. (1989). Hoghogh-e assāsi and nahād’hā-ye siāsi, Constitutional Rights and Political Institutions, Vol. I: Generalities and Foundations, Tehran: University of Tehran. [in Persian]

    36.Qazi Shariatpanahi, A. (1992). "(Constitutional Law; The Course of Concept and Discourse from a Comparative Perspective," Majalehʼi Dāneshkadehʼi Hoghogh and Ulom-e siyāsī, Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, 28: 30-78. Available at: https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_15114.html (Accessed 18 November 1402). [In Persian]

    37.Qazi Shariatpanahi, A. (1994). Bāyasteh’hā-ye hoghogh-e omomi (Constitutional Rights Requirements). Tehran: Yaldā. [In Persian]

    38.Qazi Shariatpanahi, A. (1996). Goftār’hā-i dar hoghogh-e omomi, Speeches in Public Law, Tehran: Dādgstar, V. 1. [In Persian]

    39.Soltani, N. (2011). "Darāmadi tārikhi bar masaʼleh-ye ejrāye ghānoon-e asāssi, A Historical Introduction on the Implementation of the Constitution," Nashri-ye hoghogh-e asāssi, Journal of Constitutional Rights, 7, 13: 35-56. Available at: https://www. asasimag.ir /article_105029.html?lang=en (Accessed 18 November 2023). [In Persian]

    40.Soltani, S.N. (2021). "Hoghogh-e asāssi -ye Na’neveshteh: darsi farāmosh’shodeh az abolfazl-e qāzi (Unwritten Constitutional Rights; A Forgotten Lesson from Abulfazl Qazi," Dānesh-e hoghogh-e omomi (Journal of Public Law Knowledge, 10, 34: 112-83, . [In Persian]

    41.Tabatabaei, S.J. (2017). "Sokhan’rāni dar hamāyesh-e Iran hamin jāst ke estādeh’im, Speech at the "Iran Conference, this is where we stand," Tehran: Khāneh-ye andishmandan-e oloom-e ensāni. Available at: https://3danet.ir/iran-1395 (Accessed 18 November 1402).  [In Persian]

    42.Vedel, G.  (1990). « Rapport de synthèse », in Association française des constitutionnalistes, La continuité constitutionnelle en France de 1789 à 1989. Paris: Economica. [In French]

    1. Vedel, G. (1958-1959). Cours De Droit Constitutionnel Et D’institutions Politiques. Paris: Les cours de Droit. [In French]
    2. Vedel, G. (1981). Une image de la science politique à travers la Revue française de science politique, étude quantitative (1951-1980) pour contribuer à une histoire de la science politique en France, mém. DEA d’Études politiques, IEP Paris. [In French]

    45.Venn Dicey, A (2016). Daramadi bar hoghogh-e assasi, An Introduction to Constitutional Rights, ed. Seyed Naser Soltani. Tehran: Negah-e moʿāser. [In Persian]