سازوبرگ ایدئولوژی در سیاست گذاری آموزش و پرورش ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، ایران

2 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

‌در بیرون از جعبه سیاه نظام سیاسی، میدانی از نیروهای متعارض وجود دارد که نبرد میان کنشگران و ذی‌نفعان به‌علت ایدئولوژی‌های مختلفی که دارند بر فرایند سیاستگذاری عمومی، و تدوین سیاست‌ها تأثیر دارد. بیرون از نظام سیاسی مراکز قدرت و نهادها وجود دارند که هریک مدعی تعیین دستور کار برای سیاست‌های آموزشی‌اند. این کنشگران محیط بیرونی چنان توانمندند که بیشتر به شکل ایدئولوژیک سیاست‌های آموزشی را تعیین می‌کنند و ورودی‌های نظام آموزشی را شکل می‌دهند. دو پرسش پژوهشی عبارت‌اند از: 1. چه کنشگرانی در بیرون از نظام سیاسی در چرخه سیاستگذاری آموزش‌وپرورش در ایران نقش دارند؟ 2. هریک از این کنشگران با چه ایدئولوژی‌ای و چه نوع مطالباتی را دنبال می‌کنند؟ در فرضیه بیان می‌شود که میدان سیاستگذاری در ایران از سازوکارهای حزبی، صنفی و اندیشکده‌ای برای اثرگذاری بازیگران و شکل‌دهی به حوزه عمومی اثربخش بهره‌مند نیست، در نتیجه تنها مطالبات ذی‌نفعان و بازیگران همراستا با ایدئولوژی نظام سیاسی در دستور کار سیاسی قرار می‌گیرد. برای پاسخ به این پرسش از چارچوب نظری ترکیبی از نظریه حوزه عمومی، سازوبرگ ایدئولوژیک دولت و میدان منازعه برگرفته از اندیشه‌های هابرماس، آلتوسر و بوردیو استفاده شده است. با بهره‌گیری از روش انتقادی، ورودی‌های نظام سیاستگذاری آموزش‌وپرورش که نوعی مطالبات کنشگران و ذی‌نفعان در میدان قدرت و حوزه عمومی است، تحلیل خواهد شد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان‌دهنده وجود کاستی اساسی در میدان ذی‌نفعان آموزش‌وپرورش است که فرایند سیاستگذاری را یکسویه ساخته است. در نهایت، راهکارهای سیاستی همچون تقویت حوزه عمومی و استفاده بهینه از ظرفیت انجمن‌های علمی، تشکل‌ها و اصناف ذی‌نفعان ارائه می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Ideological Apparatus in Iran’s Education Policy

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rohola Eslami 1
  • Elahe Valizadeh 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
2 MA in Political Science, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

In any political system or government, there are conflicting forces composed of a multitude of actors (e.g., politicians, activists and other stakeholders) with diverse ideologies that are vying for power to influence the public policy process at all stages from policy formulation and policy execution to policy assessment. Certainly, one of the most significant government policy areas is in the field of education. Contrary to the positivist approach, education policies and strategies are not formed in a vacuum. Outside all political systems, there are individuals and institutions that expectedly endeavor to set the agenda for national education policies. These external actors are often powerful enough to have a determining impact on education policies based on their worldviews and rigid ideological thinking about education.  Even though they might not necessarily oppose policies aimed at improving the quality of education in order to confront both the traditional and emerging challenges of building and maintaining efficient, equitable and forward-looking education systems.
The authors try to find suitable answers to the following research questions: 1. Which actors greatly influence Iran’s decision-making and policymaking process in the field of education? 2. What are the ideological thinking and typical demands of each major group of actors influencing Iran’s education policies? In the hypothesis, it is claimed that the weaknesses of competitive mechanism by which political parties, labor unions and non-governmental organizations often crucially influence policymaking in the public sphere have led to a situation in the existing political arena that the demands of stakeholders and actors who are aligned with the dominant political ideology are predominantly considered by the policymakers’ agenda-setting efforts in the field of education. For the purpose of hypothesis testing, the authors use a composite theoretical framework based on Habermas’ theory of public space, Althusser's theory of ideology (and ideological state apparatuses), and Bourdieu's field theory. They relied on the works of these prominent scholars because Habermas's theory of the public sphere offers valuable lenses through which one might be able to examine the intricate interplay between the external actors and the broader public domain. Althusser's concept of ideological apparatus serves as a critical tool for understanding how ideologies are disseminated and mobilized in the education policy arena. Furthermore, Bourdieu's theory of the field provides valuable insights into the power dynamics that shape the education policy landscape.
Using the method of critical analysis, the demands related to the material interest, socio-economic needs, and politico-cultural preferences of the key activists and stakeholders (e.g., the Ministry of Education, administrative authorities, professional associations for teachers, student councils, parent–teacher association, seminaries and theological institutions, etc.) as the factors influencing the education policymaking process will be examined. By subjecting these demands to a careful scrutiny within their chosen theoretical framework, the authors attempt to reveal the ideological forces that underlie Iran's education policies. In the hope of overcoming the shortcomings of the country’s education policymaking efforts, a few policy recommendations are ultimately presented in the concluding section, for instance, the necessity to base the education policymaking on an inclusive participatory approach, strengthening the role of all relevant governmental and non-governmental actors working cooperatively in the public sphere, and optimally using the capacity of all major stakeholders’ scientific associations, organizations and labor unions in the field of education in Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Educational Policymaking
  • Field
  • Ideology
  • Iran
  • Public Space
  1. References

    1. Afkar (2019). “The Conference of the Islamic Community of Educators will be Held,” (afkarnews.com). Available at: https://www.afkarnews.com/fa/tiny/news-895840 (Accessed 13 April 2023). [In Persian]
    2. Ashouri, M; and et al. (2021). “Discovering the Experience of Failing University Entrance Exam among Applicants: A Grounded Theory Study,” Journal of Psychological Science 19, 96: 1593-1605, . [In Persian]
    3. Asr-e Īrān. (2020). “The Objection of Seven Specialized Associations to the Employment of Students as History and Social Science Teachers,” (asriran.com). Available at: https://www.asriran. com/ fa/news/748259 (Accessed 25 May 2023). [In Persian]
    4. Atiye (2021). “The Financial Turnover of Entrance Exam and Education Intermediaries,” (atiyeonline.ir). Available at: https://www.atiyeonline.ir/news/10385 (Accessed 27 April 2023). [In Persian]
    5. Basij Organization of the Educators. (2018). “The Need to Transform the Idea of “Citizen” Training into “Slave” Training,” Available at: https://cbo.ir/node/22263 (Accessed 16 April 2023). [In Persian]
    6. Bonnewitz, P. (2012). Primary Lessons on Sociology from Pierre Bourdieu, Premières Leçons sur la Sociologie de Pierre Bourdieu, trans. Jahangir Jahangiri and Hassan Poorsafir. Tehran: Aghah. [In Persian]
    7. Bourdieu, P. (2017). Ensān-e dāneshgāhi, Homo Academicus, Trans. Hasan Chavoshian. Tehran: Parse. [In Persian]
    8. Daneshfard, K. (2014). Farayand-e khat-e’mashʿi-gozāri-ye omomi, Public Policymaking Process, Tehran: Saffar. [In Persian]
    9. Dawoodi, R. (2011). “Evaluation of the Performance and Obstacles in front of the Student Council for Involving Students in School Activities,” Rahyāfti no dar modiriyat-e āmozeshi, New Approaches in Educational Management, 3, 12: 141-155, Available at: https:// journals.marvdasht. ir/article_980.html (Accessed 29 April 2023). [In Persian]
    10. Dehgan, A. (2021). “Will the Ratings make it Through the Final Turn Safely?” Etemad. Available at: https://www.magiran.com/ article/ 4202586 (Accessed 25 April 2023). [In Persian]
    11. (2022). “Spokesperson of the Teachers’ Organization: Eliminate the Security View, The Teachers’ Movement is Admirable,” Available at: https://ensafnews.com/353247 (Accessed 9 April 2023). [In Persian]
    12. Farasatkhah, M. (1998). SAR’āghāz-e no’andishi-ye moʿāser, The Beginning of Contemporary New Thinking, Tehran: Sherkat Sahami Enteshar. [In Persian]
    13. Fathtabar Firouzjaei, K; and et al. (2021). “Pathology of the Current Situation of the Student Assessment and Admission System in the Country with a Focus on the Entrance Examination and Providing a Solution to Improve the Student Assessment and Admission Model: A Comparative Study,” Pajohesh’ha-ye tarbiyati, Educational Research, 8, 42: 49-77, 52547/erj.8.42.49>. [In Persian]
    14. Feirahi, D. (2001). “Islamic State and Products of Religious Thought,” Majalehʼi dāneshkadehʼi hoghogh and olom-e siyāsī, The Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, 51, 0: 157-196. Available at: https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_12650.html (Accessed 18 April 2023). [In Persian]
    15. Feirahi, D. (2015). Fegh va siyāsat Īrān-e moʿāser, Jurisprudence and Politics in the Contemporary Iran, Tehran: Ney, Vol. 2. [In Persian]
    16. Ferretter, L. (2013). Louis Althusser, trans. Amir Ahmadi Arian. Tehran: Markaz. [In Persian]
    17. Habermas, J. (2002) Bohrān-e moshroeʿyat, Legitimation Crisis, trans. Jahangir Moeini. Tehran: Ghameno. [In Persian]
    18. Habermas, J. (2015). Nazarieh-ye konesh-e ertebāti: aghl and aghlāniyat-e jāmeʿeh, zist’jāhān and nezām-e naghādi-ye mafhom-e kārkard’garāyāneh-ye aghl, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. Kamal Poladi. Tehran: Markaz. [In Persian]
    19. Hashemian, F; and et al. (2016). “Tahlil-e moshārekhat-e bakhsh-e khososi dar nezām-e āmozesh va parvaresh, Analysis of Private Sector Participation in the Education System, ” Fasl’nāmeh-ye siyāsat’ha-ye rāhbordi-ye and kalān, Quarterly Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies,  3, 12: 1-26. Available at: https://www.jmsp .ir/article_12951.html (Accessed 24 April 2023). [In Persian]
    20. (2013). “The Guidelines of the Eminent Authorities and Scholars of the Hawzeh for the Excellence of the Programs of the Ministry of Education,” (hawzahnews.com). Available at: https:// hawzah.net/fa/Magazine/View/ 6435/7890/101823 (Accessed 21 April 2023). [In Persian]
    21. (2019). “Statement of the Qom Province’s Islamic Association of Educators Concerning the Current Issues of the Country,” Hawzah News Agency (hawzahnews.com). Available at: https://www.hawzahnews.com/ news/924594 (Accessed 31 March 2023). [In Persian]
    22. (2020). “The Work of Textbook Revision would be Started and Pursued with the Cooperation of the Hawzeh,” Hawzah News Agency (hawzahnews.com). Available at: https://www.hawzahnews. com/ news/930088 (Accessed 4 April 2023). [In Persian]
    23. Headquarters of Seminaries-Schools Cooperation Website. (n.d.) “Headquarters of Hawzeh-Schools Cooperation at A Glance,” Available at: http://hamkariha.ir/fa/about (Accessed 23 April 2023). [In Persian]
    24. Headquarters of Seminaries-Schools Cooperation Website. (2017, September 3) “Practical Guide for the Provincial Activities of the Headquarters of Hawzeh-Schools Cooperation,” Available at: http://hamkariha.ir/fa/ news/11220/8/10 (Accessed 24 April 2023). [In Persian]
    25. Heywood, A. (2017). Siyāsat-e jahāni, Global Politics, Trans. Seyed Masoud Mousavi Shafaee. Tehran: Samt, Vol. 1. [In Persian]
    26. Islamic Association of Khansar Teachers, the. (n.d) “The Statute of the Islamic Teachers’ Association of Iran,” (moalleman.blog.ir). Available at: https://moalleman.blog.ir/page/about-me (Accessed 16 April 2023). [In Persian]
    27. IRNA (The Islamic Republic News Agency). (2002). “The Center for the Solidarity of Iranian Educators Invited Tehran’s Intellectual Elites to a Gathering,” (irna.ir). Available at: https://www.irna.ir/news/5563885 (Accessed 9 April 2023). [In Persian]
    28. IRNA (The Islamic Republic News Agency). (2019). “Commercialization Weakens the Functions of the Educational System,” (irna.ir). Available at: https://www.irna.ir/news/83391851 (Accessed 8 April 2023). [In Persian]
    29. IRNA (The Islamic Republic News Agency). (2020). “The Constant Presence of Alborz Educationalists in the Elections,” (irna.ir). Available at: https://www.irna.ir/news/83684196 (Accessed 17 April 2023). [In Persian]
    30. ISNA (The Iranian Students' News Agency). (2015). “The Party of Iran’s Children’s Gratitude to the Negotiating Team of Our Country,” (isna.ir). Available at: https://www.isna.ir/news/ 94042313049 (Accessed 7 April 2023). [In Persian]
    31. Islamic Parliament Research Center. (2003). “(Negaresh-ei b majles-e dānesh’āmozi (A Look at the Student Assembly),” Markaz-e pajohesh’hā-ye majlis-e shorā-ye eslāmi (rc.majlis.ir). Available at: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/733231 (Accessed 2 May 2023). [In Persian]
    32. Jalali, M. (2007). “Tahlil-e rābeteh-ye nā’barābari’hā-ye tabaghāti and nā’barābari’hā-ye āmozeshi, An Analysis of the Relationship between Social Class and Educational Inequalities with an Emphasis on the Role of Intervening Variables,” Faslnāmeh-ye talim and tarbiyat, Journal of Education, 91: 15-53, Available at: https://www.magiran.com/paper/471112 (Accessed 26 April 2023). [In Persian]
    33. Jame Jam Online. (2002). “Islamic Association of Gilan Educators: Consider Special Privileges for the Elementary School Teachers,” (jamejamonline.i). Available at: https://jamejamonline.ir/fa/news/ 8341 (Accessed 14 April 2023). [In Persian]
    34. Karamipour, H. (2018). AZ setiz tā setāyesh, From Tension to Compromise: Modern Education and Religious Forces in Iranian Contemporary History, Tehran: Negārestān andisheh. [In Persian]
    35. Kazemi, A. (2016). Amr-e rozmareh dar jāmeʿeh-ye pasā’enghelābi, The Everyday in Post-Revolutionary Society, Tehran: Farhang-e Javid. [In Persian]
    36. Kraft, M.; Furlong, S.R. (2017). Siyāsat’gozāri-ye omomi, Public Policy: Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives, Trans. Nader Hoshmandyar. Tehran: shor’āfarin. [In Persian]
    37. Menashri, D. (2018). Education and the Making of Modern Iran, Ttrans. Mohammad Hosein Badamchi and Erfan Mosleh. Tehran: Sina. [In Persian]
    38. Ministry of Interior News Portal. (2022a). “List of Political Parties and Groups,” )moi.ir). Available at: https://old.moi.ir/Files/MOI/ Files/17/1710a257-2f78-4db9-b5ec-b8c9a6ef460b.pdf (Accessed 30 March 2023). [In Persian]
    39. Ministry of Interior, General Depatment of Political Affairs. (2022b). “The Characteristics of Professional Associations and Non-Political Specialized Organizations,” Ministry of Interior News Portal (old.moi.ir). Available at: https://old.moi.ir/Files/MOI/Files/f8/ f88e0495-8786-4d9b-8931-131db8eeff35.pdf (Accessed 30 March 2023). [In Persian]
    40. Mohammadpour, A. (2011). Ravesh dar ravesh: darbāreh-ye sākht-e maʿrefat dar oloom-e ensāni, Method in Method: On the Structure of Knowledge in Humanities, Tehran: Logos. [In Persian]
    41. Mohammadpour, A. (2021). Zed-e ravesh, Counter-Method: The Philosophical Underpinnings and Practical Procedures of Qualitative Methodology, Tehran: Logos. [In Persian]
    42. Moini Alamdari, J. (2006). Ravesh’shenāsi-ye nazarieh’hā-ye jadid dar siyāsat, Methodology of New Theories of Politics, Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Persian]
    43. (2020). “The 11th Majlis Deals with the Bottlenecks in the Field of Education,” (namayande.com). Available at: https:// namayande.com/news/161508 (Accessed 7 April 2023). [In Persian]
    44. Nash, K. (2017). Jāmeʿeh’shenāsi siāsi-ye moʿāser: jahāni’shodan, siyāsat and ghodrat, Contemporary Political Sociology: Globalization, Politics and Power, trans. Mohammad Taghi Delforoz. Tehran: Kavir. [In Persian]
    45. Nowzari, H. (2002). Bāz’khāni-ye habermās, Rereading Habermas: An Introduction to Jürgen Habermas Opinions, Thoughts and Theories, Tehran: Cheshmeh. [In Persian]
    46. Pana News Agency. (2019). “The Formation of Alavi and Fatemi Assemblies is a Student Mobilization in order to Strengthen the Spirit of Expressing Demands," (pana.ir). Available at: https://www. pana.ir/news-29/965784 (Accessed 4 May 2023). [In Persian]
    47. Pana News Agency. (2021). “The Iranian Islamic Cultural Association Announced its Support for Hemati,” (pana.ir). Available at: https://pana.ir/news/1192901 (Accessed 11 April 2023). [In Persian]
    48. (2018). “The Connection between the Most Expensive Schools in Tehran and Political Officials: From Khatami and Hajarian to Mahdavi Kani and Haddad Adal,” (parsine.com). Available at: https://www.parsine.com/ 471153 (Accessed 28 April 2023). [In Persian]
    49. (2021). “From the Authorities’ Concern for the Academic Status of the Hawzeh to the Teaching of Tolāb in Schools,” (pishkhan.com). Available at: https://www.pishkhan.com/news/ 221 353 (Accessed 19 May 2023). [In Persian]
    50. Rezamanesh, F; Azimi Hashemi, M. (2013). “Investigating Methods of Strengthening the Function of Parents and Teachers Association (A Study Case of Khorasan Razavi Parents and Teachers Association,” Andisheh’hā-ye novin-e tarbiyati, New Educational Ideas) 10, 4: 131-154, . [In Persian]
    51. Student Council. (2018). The Student Council’s Operational Manual. Tehran: Menādi Tarbiat Cultural Institute. [In Persian]
    52. Teachers’ Organization News Website. (2021a). “Criticism of the 2021 National Exam and the Resolutions that Violate Justice in the Selection,” Available at: https://www.iranto.ir/15917-2 (Accessed 13 April 2023). [In Persian]