سایۀ بلند پدرسالاری بر سر زنان داستان (بررسی ردپای پدرسالاری در سووشون از منظر ساختارگرایی تکوینی)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه علوم سیاسی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه مطالعات تاریخی انقلاب اسلامی، مرکز اسناد انقلاب اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

ساختارگرایی تکوینی لوسین گلدمن مدعی وجود همخوانی ساختاری میان ساخت اجتماعی- سیاسی، ساخت آگاهی گروه‌ها و طبقات و ساختار آفرینش‌های فرهنگی به‌عنوان تجلی عینی ساخت آگاهی است. از این منظر این پژوهش، با بهره‌گیری از روش گلدمن در جامعه‌شناسی ادبیات، در پی پاسخگویی به پرسش از نسبت ساخت اجتماعی و ساختار متن ادبی در ایران است و بدین‌منظور به‌دنبال پی‌جویی ردپای یکی از تأثیرگذارترین ویژگی‌های ساختاری و اجتماعی در ایران یعنی پدرسالاری نهادینه در بافت سیاسی و اجتماعی در متن ادبیات داستانی زنانه (به‌طور خاص رمان سووشون، اثر سیمین دانشور به‌عنوان اولین رمان رسمی زنانه در ایران) است. یافته‌ها نشان‌دهنده وجود همخوانی ساختاری مورد ادعای ساختارگرایی تکوینی، میان ساختار اجتماعی - سیاسی ایران در آستانه دهه 50 و ساختار متن سیمین دانشور، در چهار سنجه تعیین‌کننده منتج از نظریه ساختارگرایی تکوینی، یعنی رابطه با منابع قدرت، کنش‌مندی و توانایی حل مسئله، خودشناسی و خودباوری و محدوده عمل در رمان سووشون (1348) است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Long Shadow of Patriarchy over the Women of Story (Investigation of the Traces of Patriarchy in Savushun from the Perspective of Genetic Structuralism)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ahmad khaleghidamghani 1
  • Sona Qajar 2
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Islamic Revolution Studies Research Group, Islamic Revolution Document Center, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Investigating and understanding the relationship between society and literature is one of the most important and attractive interdisciplinary topics. Perhaps, from a perspective, this relationship can be compared to the relationship between a person and a mirror. In this analogy, a society can be seen as a living and dynamic entity that sees its different manifestations in the mirror of literature, of course, a magical, changing and influential mirror that shows different manifestations of the society, and since consciousness is a product of a self-representative relationship, the world created by literature is mutually the originator of the construction of consciousness and the basis of change in the objective construction of society and this cycle continues.
Methodology
Lucien Goldman (1970-1913), who sought the application of dialectical materialism in literature review, chose the title of developmental (genetic) structuralism for his theory. The method of genetic structuralism speaks of two stages of perception and description in the process of examining and understanding the concordance of structures. Understanding means recognizing the meaningful structure of the work and explaining means the dialectical inclusion of the meaningful structure of the work in the comprehensive social structure and historical-social totality.
Findings
The findings of this article show the existence of a structural compatibility claimed by Genetic structuralism, between the socio-political structure of Iran at the threshold of the 1950s and the structure of Simin Daneshvar's novel.
Analysis
This article, with a detailed and line-by-line review of Savushun's novel, emphasizes the four elements of relationship with sources of power, activeness and ability to solve problems, self-knowledge and self-belief and the scope of action that are clear signs of the status of women in a patriarchal structure and explains the similarities and differences of these elements in the structure of the text and establishes the relationship between this structure and the stability or change of the characteristics of the objective structure of society was an effort to explain and better understand this work in particular and women's literature in general with a sociological approach.
Zari is a quiet, patient, tolerant, timid, tolerant, weak and confined house angel, and this semantic structure of the text is related to the structure of the author's consciousness and the class that he represents in the work of giving coherence and giving meaning to the world. In this way, the traditional and patriarchal structure of Savushun (1969) is consistent with the objective structures in general and the role and position of women in these structures in particular in the social context which portrays the traditional and angelic educated woman.
Conclusions
Lucien Goldman's formative structuralism is a thought model that simultaneously studies socio-economic structures and the dialectical relationship between these structures and the text, and for this reason, it can be used in examining the aforementioned developments and how it is related to literature, especially Savushun. Accordingly, with this schema and through the four criteria resulting from it, i.e. relationship with power sources, activeness and ability to solve problems, self-awareness and self-belief, and limits of action, this article analyzed Savushun. This article shows the relationship between the dual social-economic relations (city and village) along with the role of the patriarchal authoritarian power structure in these two spaces and the effect of all these components on the many characters of daily life depicted in the novel, especially women, and the personality crises caused by the mentioned relationships are in their sensory-behavioral forms.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Patriarchy
  • Genetic Structuralism
  • Structure of Consciousness
  • Structure of Text
  • Savushun
  1. References

    1. Abrahamian, E. (2005). Iran between two revolutions, Translated by Ahmad Golmohammadi, Mohammad Ebrahim Fatahi, Tehran, Ney publication. [In Persian]
    2. Adorno, T.H; Lukcs, G; Goldmann, L; and Others. (2002). An introduction to the sociology of literature, a collection of essays, selected and Translated by Mohammad Jafar Pouyndeh, fifth edition, Tehran, Cheshme Publishing House. [In Persian]
    3. Afari, J. (2000). Iran's Constitutional Revolution, translated by Reza Rezaei, Tehran, Bistun. [In Persian]
    4. Ashtari, B. (2004). Women in the History of Contemporary Iran (Zanjan University International Seminar Proceedings, March 15-17, 2014), Tehran, Kavir Publications. [In Persian]
    5. Berger, P; Luckmann, T. (1996). The social construction of reality, translated by Fariborz Majidi, Tehran, Andishehay Asr No publication. [In Persian]
    6. Daneshvar, S. (1969). Suvshon, Tehran, Kharazmi Publishing House. [In Persian]
    7. Fazeli, F; Karimpoor, N. (2010). Sociology of Literature: Branches and Methods, Monthly Book of Literature, December 2010, No. 159. http://noo.rs/wl7hZ. [In Persian]
    8. Goldmann, L. (1978). Philosophy and human sciences, translated by Asadpour Piranfar, Tehran, Javidan Publishing House. [In Persian]
    9. Goldmann, L. (1990). Constructive criticism, Translated by Mohammad Taghi Ghiyashi, Tehran, Bozorgmehr Publications. [In Persian]
    10. Goldmann, L; Adorno, T.H; Piaget, J ; and Others (2002). Society of culture and literature: Lucien Goldmann, collection of articles, selected and translated by Mohammad Jafar Poindeh, Tehran Cheshme Publishing House. [In Persian]
    11. Halliday, F. (1979). Dictatorship and development of capitalism in Iran, Translated by Fazullah Nik Ayin, Tehran, Amir Kabir. [In Persian]
    12. Kahnamoueepoor, Z.H. (2010). Sociological criticism and Lucin Goldman: from sociological criticism to aesthetic perception, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company. [In Persian]
    13. Katouzian, H. (1995). Fourteen articles in literature, society, philosophy and economics, Tehran, publishing center. [In Persian]
    14. Khaniki, H; Keihani, M. (2013). A model for the study of women's press in Iran, Cultural and Communication Studies, Fall 2013, No. 28. http://noo.rs/c5Qmr. [In Persian]
    15. Malekzadeh, M. (1972). History of Iran's Constitutional Revolution, Volume 3, Tehran, Ibn Sina. [In Persian]
    16. Mesbahipooriranian, J. (1979). Social reality and the world of fiction, Tehran, Amir Kabir Publications. [In Persian]
    17. Mirabedini, H. (1998). One hundred years of Iran's story writing, Tehran, Cheshme Publishing House. [In Persian]
    18. Pouyandeh, M. (1997). Society, culture, literature: Lucin Goldman, (collection of articles), Tehran, Cheshme publication. [In Persian]
    19. Pouyandeh, M. (1998). An introduction to the sociology of literature (Article Collection), Tehran, Naqsh Jahan Publications. [In Persian]
    20. Price, M. (2000)” women`s movement in iran, 1850-2000, Persian outpust, Princeton, N. J
    21. Rejali, S. (1971). The role of women in Iran's education" The role of women in Iranian culture and society (a collection of speeches by representatives of the Iranian Women's Organization), Tehran, Iran's Women's Organization. [In Persian]
    22. Salami, G.H; Najmabadi, A. (2005). Sharq Women's Movement, Tehran: Shiraz. [In Persian]
    23. Sanasarian, E. (2005). Women's rights movement in Iran (insurgency, decline and suppression from 1901 to 1957 revolution) Translated by Noushin Ahmadi Khorasani, first edition, Tehran, Akhtaran publishing house. [In Persian]
    24. SHamisa, S. (2001). Literary criticism, Tehran, Ferdowsi publication. [In Persian]
    25. Toliuee, V; Rezaei, M. (2007). The Necessity of Applying Formative Structure in the Sociology of Community Literature (Formative Structuralism as a Method), Sociology of Iran, Fall, No. 31. http://noo.rs/G9OQ3 . [In Persian]
    26. Valizadeh, V. (2008), Gender in the works of Iranian Female Novelists, Literary Criticism, Spring 2008, Number 1. http://noo.rs/05L5n. [In Persian]
    27. Zahed, S; Khajenoori, B. (2003). Review and brief analysis of the social role of women in the history of Iran, Farhang, Winter 2003, No. 48. http://noo.rs/tkDWJ . [In Persian]
    28. Zahed, S; Khajenoori, B. (2004). The Women's Movement in Iran's Contemporary History, Allameh Tabatabai University Articles Collection, 2004, Number 185. http://noo.rs/9bwDw [In Persian]