تاریخ تحول نظام آموزش سیاسی در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار علوم سیاسی و روابط بین‌الملل، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

 
آموزش دانش سیاسی هر کشور بخشی از میراث فرهنگی - تمدنی آن است. شناخت آن به درک بهتر و اساسی‌تر آن میراث کمک می‌کند. یکی از راه‌های شناخت آموزش سیاسی یک کشور مطالعه تاریخ تحول نظام آموزش سیاسی آن است. ساختار نظام آموزشی، مبانی و مباحث آموزشی، منابع و امکانات انسانی و علمی مطرح در آن حوزه و نیز تحول حوزه‌های بالا در بستر زمان موضوعات قابل ‌بحث و تحقیق در این زمینه است. اگرچه آموزش رسمی (آکادمیک) از دوره پهلوی در ایران شروع شده است، ولی برای ریشه‌یابی بهتر مسئله لازم است آموزش‌های غیررسمی سیاسی که از دوره قاجار شروع شده نیز مورد بررسی و توجه قرار گیرد. پرسش اصلی پژوهش حاضر این است که آیا نظام آموزش سیاسی ایران در سده گذشته تحول و تکامل یافته است؟ فرض ما بر این است که متأثر از تحولات سیاسی، اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی سده گذشته تحول و تکامل عمده‌ای در نظام آموزش سیاسی ایران بروز کرده است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد در دوره‌های بالا در سه حوزه نهادهای آموزشی، استادان و دانشجویان و دانش‌آموختگان رشته در زمینه اجرایی، علمی و پژوهشی نظام آموزش سیاسی تحول اساسی مانند علمی‌تر، مردمی‌تر و کاربردی‌تر شدن رخ داده است. چارچوب مفهومی پژوهش رهیافت واقع‌گرایانه با رویکرد توصیفی-تحلیلی با روش تحلیل داده‌های کیفی گردآوری‌شده تحولات تاریخی نظام آموزش سیاسی ایران است. داده‌های کیفی با ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات کتابخانه‌ای است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

History of the Evolution of Iran’s Political Education System

نویسنده [English]

  • Mohammad Ali Basiri
Associate Professor, Political Science Dept., University of Isfahan
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Introduction
The political education system in every country is considered a part of its cultural and civilizational heritage. Research in this case can create a correct understanding of this heritage. One way to understand the political education of a country is to study the history of the evolution of its political education system. Knowing the structure of the political education system, its foundations, educational courses, resources, and human and scientific forces in this field is one of the most important steps to study and understand it. Studying the development and evolution of these three areas over time will help to understand this educational system. Although the political education system in Iran started several centuries ago in an inconsistent manner, its initial steps were taken during the Qajar period. During the Pahlavi period, formal education was established in a university form. During the period of the Islamic Republic, more fundamental steps have been taken in the evolution of the political education system, leading to extensive qualitative and quantitative changes in the three areas of educational structures, theoretical and philosophical foundations, and trained forces in this area. Based on this, the main question of this article is: What has been the history of political education system evolution in Iran? The main assumption of this article is that along with the social, political, and economic developments of Iran in the past centuries, the political education system has also changed, leading to a more scientific, popular, and practical system.
Methodology
The conceptual framework of the article is a realistic approach with an analysis of the historical developments of Iran's political education system. This article is descriptive-analytic using the method of qualitative data analysis of the historical developments of Iran's political education system. Qualitative data is collected using library findings.
Findings
The findings of the research show that:

The political education system in the Qajar period was based on transferring the basic theoretical foundations of this modern science to Iran, with a limited educational structure where professors imparted only basic knowledge of this science to students in this field. Graduates were only employed in diplomatic, political, and executive affairs in a limited capacity.
In the Pahlavi era, a complementary step was taken in the three areas of the educational system, teaching materials, and training of its graduates.
During the period of the Islamic Republic of Iran, with the developments of the cultural revolution, Iran has seen a more complete development in the qualitative and quantitative aspects of this educational system, its theoretical foundations, and its graduate force.

Analysis
In the Qajar period, the initial and limited theoretical foundations of this field were transferred to Iran, and in the Pahlavi period, with the translation movement, a wider and expanded volume of these scientific topics was introduced to Iran. During the period of the Islamic Republic, efforts were made to propose Iranian-Islamic philosophical foundations for political science, alongside the theoretical foundations of Western political science, with a more positivist approach. Steps were also taken to localize this science and train its students accordingly. In all three periods, the foundations and philosophical-epistemological roots of political science were not fundamentally transferred to Iran, despite lessons being taught in this field.
Conclusions
The results showed that this fundamental flaw has hindered the localization of political science in Iran, preventing the study of local issues and problems in both the internal and external spheres of Iran. Although progress has been made in making the field more scientific, popular, and practical, it has not yet reached the desired point. This article discusses proposed solutions to address these basic problems in these areas.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Iran
  • History of Evaluation
  • Education System
  • Politics
  • Comparative Study
  1. References

    1. Adamit, F. (1990). “Amir Kabir Va Iran”, Amir Kabir and Iran, Tehran, “Enteshat Kharazi “, Kharazmi Publications. [In Persian]
    2. Afzal, M. (1969). “Rahnamaie Amozeshe Ali Dar Iran”, Guide to higher education in Iran, Tehran, “Moasese Frahanghe Mantaghei”, Regional Culture Institute. [In Persian]
    3. Azghandi, A. (2003). “Siasat Kharejie Jomhorie Eslamie Iran”, Foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, "Nashre Ghomes", Qoms Publishing. [In Persian]
    4. Azghandi, A. (1997). “Nakar Amadie Nokhbegane Siasie Iran Beine Do Enghelab”, the ineffectiveness of Iran's political elites between the two revolutions, Tehran, “Nashre Ghomes”, Qomes Publishing. [In Persian]
    5. Barbour, I. (1997). Religion and Science, San Francisco: Harper.
    6. Bavi, M. (1969). “Vaziate Recite Olome siasi Dar Iran”, The Status of Political Science in Iran,” Faslnamei Olome Siasi”, Political Science Quarterly, Course 1, First year, Number three, Winter 2017, 286-310. In: https://psq.bou.ac.ir/author.index?vol=1052&vl=%D8%AF%D9 %88%D8%B1%D9%87%201%20(1969) (Last access 06/ 02/ 2023). [In Persian]
    7. Callinicos, A. (1999). Social Theory: A Historical Introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    8. Ghaemi Nik, M.R. (2009). “Nazarieha Dar Morede Nesbate Elm Va Din”, Theories and opinions about the relationship between science and religion, “Majalei Rahborde Farhangh”, Culture Strategy magazine, year 6, at: https://sccr.ir/Files/5278.pdf (Last access 02/10/2022). [In Persian]
    9. Gurbanzade Sewar, G.A. (2012). “Dorose Dorehie Karshnasie Olomeh Siasi, Vagheitah, Zaroratha va Entezarat, Motaleei Moredi, Daneshghahe Beinolmelalie Emam Khomeini, R. H. “,Courses of political science undergraduate courses, realities, necessities and expectations, a case study: Imam Khomeini International University, 2013, “Pazoheshaie Enteghadie Moton Va Barnamehaie Olome Ensani”, Critical Research Journal of Humanities Texts and Programs, 13, 2: 108-89. In: https://criticalstudy .ihcs.ac.ir/article_963.html (Last access 09/ 02/2023). [In Persian]
    10. Haddadadal, G.A. (2009). “Ba Ehteram Majmoeh Maghalate Ehda Shodeh Be Moaleman”, With respect to the collection of articles donated to professors, Tehran, “Chape Hars”, (Hars Press). [In Persian]
    11. Hadian, N. (1999). “Vaziate Elme Siasat Dar Iran”, (The Status of Political Science in Iran), “Faslnameie Olome Siasi”, Political Science Quarterly, winter 7, 2: 229-222. In https://ensani.ir/fa/ article/journal-number/12193 (Last access 09/ 02/2023). [In Persian]
    12. Imamzade Fard, P. (2006). “Vaziate Olome Siasi Dar Irane Moaser: Nesbateie Olome siasi Dar Keshvar Va Olome Ensani Dar Gharb: Reshtei Olome Siasi dar Daneshghahaie Iran Va Gharb”, The state of political science in contemporary Iran: the relationship between political science in the country and humanities in the West: the field of political science in Iranian and American universities, Tehran, “conghrei Melie Olome Ensani”, National Congress of Humanities. In: https://civilica.com/doc/100621 (Last access 02/10/2022). [In Persian]
    13. Karmi, M.H. (2010). “Danesh va Hekmat Dar Neghahe Molavi”, Knowledge and wisdom in Maulavi's view, Tehran, “Moasesei Motaleate Eslami”, Institute of Islamic Studies, 30-40. [In Persian]
    14. Kothari, M. (2008). “Emkane Tolide Elme Eslami – Ejtemai”, Possibility of producing social-Islamic science, “Majalei Rahborde Farhangh”, Culture Strategy Magazine, autumn, Volume 2, Number 7, 31-54. In https://www fa/article/64142/ (Last access 06/02/2023). [In Persian]
    15. Lipset, S. (1960). Political Man, the Social Bases of Politics, New York: University Press.
    16. Malek, A. (1975). "Fehreste Tosifie Ketabshenassie Olome Siassi” (Descriptive list of political science bibliography, review by Hamid Enayat, Tehran, “Entesharate Daneshghahe Tehran”, Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
    17. Medawar, P. (1984). The Limits of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    18. Motaghi, A. (1969). “Amozeshe Ali Dar Iran Va Jahan”, Higher education in Iran and the world, Mashhad, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.[In Persian]
    19. Mubarakian, A. (1998). “Chehreha Dar Tarikhcheie Nezame Amozeshe Alie Hoghogh Va Adlieihe Novin”, Figures in the History of Modern Law and Justice Higher Education System, Volume 1, Tehran, “Nashre Peidaiesh”, Peidaish Publication. [In Persian]
    20. Nabavi, A.A (2024). "Amar faeregho tahsilane olom siassi vojod nadarad”, There is no employment statistics for political science graduates, Jafar Barzgar's conversation with Abdul-Amir Nabavi, the head of the Iranian Political Science Scientific Association. https://www.irna.ir/news/83308212 (Last access 21/04/2024). [In Persian]
    21. Parsania, H. (2009). “Elme Dini Az Manzare Hekmate Eslami”, Religious science from the perspective of Islamic wisdom, “Majalei Rahborde Farhangh”, Culture Strategy magazine, summer, second period, number 6, 19-30, at: https://www.noormags.ir/view/ fa/articlepage/ 692967/ (Last access 06 / 04 / 2023). [In Persian]
    22. Porfard, M. (2013). “Elme Siasat Dar Iran, Az bazshenasi Ta Baz Sazi”, (Political science in Iran; from recognition to reconstruction), “Faslnameie Olome Siasi”, Political Science Quarterly, 7, 28, and 152-135 at: https://ensani.ir. (Last access 05/02/2023). [In Persian]
    23. Rafipour, F. (2013). “Mavanee Roshde Olom Dar Iran Va Rahe Halhaie An”, Obstacles to Iran's scientific growth and its solutions, Tehran, “Sherkate Sahamie Nashr”, Publishing Company. [In Persian]
    24. Ringer, M.M. (2002). “Amozeshe Din Va Ghoftemane Eslahe Farhanghi Dar Dorane Ghajar”, Religious education and the discourse of cultural reform in the Qajar era, Translated by Mehdi Haqyatkhah, Tehran, “Nashre Ghomes”, Ghomes Publication. [In Persian]
    25. Ritzer, G. (1988). Sociological Theory, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2nd
    26. Trigg, R. (1993). Rationality and Science: Can Science Explain Everything, Oxford: Blackwell.
    27. Yousefirad, M. (2010).” Falsafeie Siasie Irane Moaser: Barresie Ashofteghihae Mafhomi”, Contemporary Iranian Political Philosophy: Examining Conceptual Confusions, “Rhyafthaie Siasi Binolmelali”, International Political Approaches, Summer, No. 22, 201-222, at: http://ensani.ir/fa/article/journal-number/33529/ (Last access 06/02/2023). [In Persian]