الگوی برساخت اندیشه و کنش مزدکیان در پارادایم‌های «شاه-رعیت» و «شهروند- دولت»

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

چکیده

یکی از جنبش‌هایی برابری‌جویانه در تاریخ ایران جنبش انقلابی مزدک نام دارد. این جنبش به رهبری مزدک‌نامی در دوره حکمرانی قباد از پادشاهان ساسانی به‌وقوع پیوسته است. در خصوص نوع نگاه به این جنبش، دو روایت متعارض شامل؛ تقبیح و لعن جنبش مزدک از یک طرف و احترام و تحسین جنبش او از طرف دیگر ارائه شده است، مدعای مقاله در پاسخ به چرایی این روایت‌ها، بر وجود پارادایم‌های متفاوت به‌عنوان دلیل این تعارض اشاره می‌کند. ازاین‌رو این پژوهش در پی آن است که با استفاده از روش تفسیری، با واکاوی پارادایم‌های حاکم بر هر کدام از این روایات، برداشت‌های متعارض از این جنبش را قابل فهم سازد. نتایج حکایت از این دارد بر روایتی که به تقبیح و نفرین جنبش مزدک می‌پردازند، پارادایم نظری «شاه-رعیت» با فرض مشروعیت سیستم پادشاهی و نظام کاستی و طبیعی بودن جایگاه منفعل مردم در مقابل نظام سیاسی، حاکم است و پارادایم «شهروندی- دولت» که در آن مردم از حقوق کاملی برای اعتراض، مشارکت و بیان خواسته‌هایشان حتی به شکل براندازانه در مقابل دولت برخوردارند، عامل احترام و تحسین جنبش مزدک به‌شمار می‌رود. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Paradigmatic Evolution of Political Thought in the Interpretation of Mazdakian Thought and Action

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rohola Eslami 1
  • Ahmad Valavinasab 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Ph.D. Condidate, MA in Political Science, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Historical narratives find meaning within the philosophical paradigms of each period. One of the egalitarian movements in the history of Iran is called the Mazdak revolutionary movement. This movement led by Mazdak Nami took place during the reign of Ghobad, one of the Sassanid kings. Regarding the way of looking at this movement, two conflicting narratives are evident. Mazdak movement has been denounced and cursed on the one hand, and its movement has been respected and admired from the other hand. In response to the reasons of these narratives, this article claims that there are different paradigms describing the reasons for this conflict. Therefore, this study seeks to understand the conflicting perceptions of this movement by using the method of understanding and by analyzing the paradigms governing each of these narrations. The results indicate that the narrative that condemns the Mazdak movement is governed by the theoretical paradigm of "Shah-Ra'it" assuming the legitimacy of the monarchy and the system of shortcomings and the naturalness of the passive position of the people against the political system. And the "citizenship-rights" paradigm, in which people have full rights to protest, participate, and express their demands even subversively before the government, is a source of respect and admiration for the Mazdak movement.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Revolutionary movement
  • Mazdak
  • method of understanding
  • paradigm
  • Sassanids
References
Abbas, Ehsan. (1969), Ahed Ardashir, translated by S. Mohammad Ali Imam Shushtri, Tehran, Publications of National Art Association.Abbas, Parviz. (1964), two thousand and five hundred year history of Iran, first volume, published by the Central Council of the Iranian Imperial Festival.
Ahmadvand, Shuja and Ruhollah Islami. (2017), Political Thought in Ancient Iran, Tehran, Samt Publications.
Alam, Abdul Rahman. (1994), Foundations of Political Science, Tehran, Ney Publishing.Balami, Abu Ali Muhammad bin Muhammad. (1974), Tarikh Balami, by Mohammad Parvin Gonabadi, second volume, Tabesh printing house.Barnamghadam, Mohammad. (2536), an introduction to the course of thought in Iran, Tehran, Heidari Printing House.
Crone, Patricia. (1991), Kavād's Heresy and Mazdak's Revolt ,iran, Published by: British Institute of Persian Studies, pp. 21-42 .
Daniyali, Arif. (2019), Foucault; Parahesia action of the Shiite revolution and ancient Greece, Policy Quarterly, Journal of the School of Law and Political Science, Volume 50, Number 2, Pages 555-572.Dinouri, Abu Hanifa Ahmad bin Dawood. (2002), Akhbar al-Tawal, translated by Mahmoud Mahdavi Damghani, Tehran, Ney Publishing House, fifth edition.Esfahani, Hamza. (1967), History of Prophets and Kings (Sunni Kings of the Earth and Prophets), translated by Jafar Shaar, Tehran, Farhang Iran Foundation Publishing.Faulks, Case. (1381), Citizen, translated by Mohammad Taghi Delfrooz, Tehran, Nashr Kavir.Fay, Brian. (2011), Paradigmology of Humanities, translator; Morteza Mardiha, Research Institute of Strategic Studies, first edition.Fazeli, Habibullah and Sarvand, Majid. (2018), Reflections on the concept of Erte (Ashe) of ancient Iran in the light of ontology and anthropology of Iranian philosophy, Politics Quarterly, Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science, Volume 49, Number 3, 725-744.Ferdowsi, Abu al-Qasim. (1970), Shahnameh, Moscow, published by the Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union, volume 8.
Gil, Moshe. (2012), king Qubadh and mazdak Studies, Published by: The University of Chicago Press, Source: Journal of Near Easternm , pp. 75-90.
Ibn Tariq, Said. (1909), al-Tawarikh al-Majmoo Ali Tahaqiq wa al-Tasdeeq, al-Jaz al-Thani, Beirut, Sheikho Publishing House.Kalima, Utaker. (1992), History of the Mazdak School, translated by Jahangirfekari Rashad, Tehran, TOS Publications.Karbasian, Maliha and Mohammad Karimi Zanjani Asl. (2005), Manichaean-Muzdaki conflicts in Sassanid Iran, Tehran, Akhtaran Publishing.Kasraei, Mohammad Salar. (2010), Twin Rulers: Government and Legitimacy in Ancient Iran, Politics Quarterly, Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, Volume 40, Number 2, Pages 189-208. Katoozian, Homayun. (2019), Iranians: ancient times to the contemporary period, translation; Hossein Shahidi, Tehran, publishing center, 17th edition.Kazemi akhavan, Bahram. (2004), Mazdak Social Movement and Shahi Political Thought, No. 65, Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science.Kimlicka, Will. (2016), an introduction to contemporary political philosophy, translated by Maitham Badamchi and Mohammad Mubasheri, Tehran, Negah Masares publishing house.Lakzai, Najaf. (2010), The Challenge of Religious Politics and Sultanate Order, Islamic Science and Culture Research Institute, third edition.Liedman, Son Erik. (2012), History of Political Opinions, translated by Saeed Moghadam, Tehran, Nashr Dat.
Luttinger, Paul M. D. (1921), "Mazdak.," The Open Court, pp.664-685.
Majidi, Ebrahim. (2009), Paradigm and its influence in political science, with a look at Cohen's opinions, Tehran, Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Contemporary Political Essays, 1st year, 2nd issue.Manouchehri, Abbas. (2016), Beyond Suffering and Dream (Volume 1), Tehran, Islamic History Research Institute: Human Sciences Research and Development Institute.Manouchehri, Abbas. (2017), Advice Paradigm, Tehran, Research Institute of Contemporary History, first edition.
Manouchehri, Abbas. (2017), Approach and Method in Political Science, Tehran, Samit Publications, third edition.
Masoudi, Abulhasan Ali bin Hossein. (1977), Moruj al-Dhahab, translated by Abolqasem Payandeh, volume 1, Tehran, book translation and publishing company, second edition. Minoui, Mojtabi and Mohammad Ismail Rizvani. (1975), Tenser's letter to Gashanseb, Tehran, Kharazmi Publishing Co., 2nd edition.Monshi, Nasrallah. (2018), Kalileh and Damneh, edited by Mojtabi Minoui Tehrani, Tehran, Atisa Publications, second edition.Mujtahid Shabestri, Mohammad. (2001), a critique on the official reading of religion, Aban magazine.Naqvi, Seyyed Ali Mahdi. (1974), Mazdak's beliefs, Tehran, Soltani Press Institute, third edition.
Saboorifar, farhad. (2017), MAZDAKISM AND ITS HISTORICAL PRINCIPALS, Medellín-Colombia, institucion universitaria Salazar Y HERRERA, PP.2478-2483.
Sangari, Esmail and Alireza Karbasi. (2017), examining the causes of the formation of Mazdak revolutionary idealism, and its impact on the failure of this movement, Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 6th year, 2nd issue, autumn and winter.Saree al-Qalam, Mahmoud. (2017), Authoritarianism in the Pahlavi Era, Tehran, Ney Publishing.Shaar, Jafar. (2013), Policy (Sir al-Muluk), Tehran, Amir Kabir Publications.Soroush, Abdul Karim. (2000), Shahriari ritual and religion, Tehran, Sarat Cultural Institute.Tabari, Mohammad bin Jarir. (1973), Tarikh Tabari, translated by Abolqasem Payandeh, Farhang Iran Foundation Publications, second volume.Taheri, Mohammad and Mohammad Momeni Thani. (2010), examining the structural difference of the story of Mazdak in Ferdowsi's Shahnameh with other historical sources, research on Persian language and literature (Gohar Goya), fourth year, number two.Thaalabi, Abu Mansour. (1949), Shahnameh Tha'ali (in the description of the lives of the sultans of Iran), translated by Mahmoud Hedayat, Tehran, Majlis Printing House.Yaqoubi, Ahmad bin Abi Yaqoob. (1977), Tarikh Yaqoubi, translated by Mohammad Ebrahim Aiti, first volume, Tehran Translation and Publishing Company, third edition.Yasmi, Rashid. (3rd year), Ardaviraf Nameh, Qom, Mehr magazine, number one.Zarin Kob, Abdul Hossein. (1998), Rozgaran (History of Iran from the beginning to the fall of the Pahlavi dynasty).