وفاق و اجماع در ایران: چالش‌ها و راهکارها

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

یکی از مهم‌ترین موضوعات مطرح در فضای سیاسی کنونی ایران به‌عنوان یک جامعه چندفرهنگی موضوع وفاق و اجماع است. علاوه بر پیامد و نقش جهانی شدن، ویژگی‌های فرهنگ سیاسی نیروهای اجتماعی و سیاسی در ایران همراه با حاکم بودن سیاست حذفی بر رفتار نخبگان سیاسی در ایران اهمیت موضوع را برای جامعه ایران به‌دلیل چالش‌های فراروی سیاستگذاری دوچندان کرده است. اجماع به معنای وفاداری به ارزش‌های مشترک در میان افراد یک جامعه است. در هر جامعه اجماع در سه سطح مطرح است؛ اول میان مردم، دوم میان دولت و مردم و سوم میان نخبگان سیاسی حاکمیت. وفاق در جامعه کنونی ایران در هر سه سطح با چالش مواجه است. پرسش اصلی این پژوهش علل نبود اجماع در جامعه ایران در هر سه سطح است. فرضیه پژوهش مهم‌ترین عامل را در فرهنگ سیاسی نخبگان، ماهیت نیروهای اجتماعی و سیاسی و پیچیدگی ساخت قدرت سیاسی در ایران می‌داند. روش پژوهش کیفی با هدف تبیین رابطه دو متغیر اجماع و نقش فرهنگ سیاسی در ایجاد چالش‌های فراروی آن است. روش جمع‌آوری داده‌ها اسنادی با استفاده از ابزار کتابخانه‌ای است. چارچوب نظری تلفیقی از دیدگاه‌های چلبی و بشیریه است؛ بدین‌معنا ابتدا مفهوم وفاق و سطوح آن از دیدگاه چلبی توضیح و سپس با استناد به نظرهای آقای بشیریه مفهوم و راهکار وفاق در میان نخبگان سیاسی تشریح شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش حاکی از آن است که ماهیت ساخت قدرت همراه با فرهنگ سیاسی حاکم بر رفتار سیاسی نخبگان حاکمیتی و ویژگی‌های نیروهای اجتماعی و سیاسی در ایران وفاق همگانی را با چالش‌هایی مواجه کرده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Agreement and Consensus in Iran: Challenges and Solutions

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hosein Masoudnia 1
  • Niloufar Shafie yangabadi 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Esfahan, Esfahan, Iran.
2 Ph.D. Condidate, Political Science, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Esfahan, Esfahan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Objective:
One of the most important issues in the current political climate of Iran as a multicultural society is the issue of consensus. In addition to the consequences and the role of globalization, the characteristics of the political culture of social and political forces in Iran and the dominance of the elimination policy on the behavior of the political elites in Iran have doubled the importance of the issue for the Iranian society due to the challenges facing policy making. In every society, there are three levels of consensus; The first is between the people, the second is between the government and the people, and the third is between the ruling political elite. The main problem of this research is the reasons of the lack of consensus in Iranian society in all three levels. The research hypothesis considers the nature of social and political forces and the complexity of building political power in Iran. Using the qualitative research method this article aims to explain the relationship between the two consensus variables and the role of political culture in creating the challenges. The method of data collection is based on library method. The theoretical framework is a synthesis of Chalabi's and Bashiriyeh's views. In this sense, the concept of consensus and its levels have been explained from Chalabi's point of view, and then the concept and solution of consensus among political elites have been explained by referring to the opinions of Bashiriyeh. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • agreement
  • consensus
  • political elites
  • government
  • social forces
References
Abdulahi, M. (1999). Factors affecting social harmony and public culture (especially social harmony gathering and public gathering), Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. ]in Persian [
Abrahamian, Y. (1998). Iran between two revolutions, translated by Ahmad Golmohammadi and Mohammad Ebrahim Fatahi, Tehran: Ney. [in Persian]
Abrahamian, Y. (1997). Iranian political sociology; Collection of articles, translated by Soheila Torabi, Tehran: Shiraze. [in Persian [
Almopnd. G. powel. M (1966). Comprative politic, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Aron, R. (2002). The stages of thought process in political sociology, translated by Bagherparham, Tehran: Elmi. ]in Persian [
Ayubi, H (2000). Finding and Reliability of Political Parties in the West, Tehran: Soroush. [in Persian [
Azad Aramaki, T. (2019). A speech about the Iranian corona virus, Tehran, Availabale at: Fa.shafagna.com, (Assessed22 August 2024). ]in Persian]
Azghandi, A. (2011). An Introduction to Political Sociology of Iran, Tehran: Ghomes. ]in Persian [
Badie, B. (1997). Political development, translated by Ahmad Naqibzadeh, Tehran: Ghomes. ]in Persian [
Bashirieh, H. (2004). An introduction to the sociology of consensus and consensus, Naghed, Vol.1, No.3, Tehran, pp.75-67, ensani.ir/file/ download/article/20100902130039. ]in Persian [
Bashirieh, H. (1997). Political Sociology (the role of social forces in political life), Tehran: Ney. ]in Persian [
Bashirieh, H. (2002). An introduction to the political sociology of Iran (period of the Islamic Republic of Iran), Tehran: contemporary view. [in Persian [
Bashirieh, H. (2003). Teaching political knowledge: the basics of theoretical and institutional political science, Tehran: Negar. ]in Persian [
Chalabi, M. (1993). Agreement Sozijali, Social Science Journal, Vol.3, No.6, Tehran https://jnoe.ut.ac.ir/article_15545_ 6cc548baca30e1 c1cdbf85f8c52c81d0.pdf. ]in Persian [
Chalabi, M. (2006). Social analysis in the space of action, Tehran: Ney Publishing. [in Persian [
Cheng. K. K. et al (2020). Face Masks in the Community Durinig the Covid-19 Parndemic: Alturism and Solidarity, publishe online April/16/2020.
Delphi, M. Navah, A. (2015). Investigating factors affecting social harmony (a case study of Bushehr urban households), Quarterly Journal of Sociological Studies of Youth, Vol.5, No.17, www.sid.ir/ paper/170157.  ]in Persian [
Giddens, A. (2004). Sociology, translated by Manouchehr Sabouri, Tehran: Ney. ]in Persian [
Gulmohammadi, A. (2013). What is, evolution and vision of the government, Tehran: Ney. ]in Persian [
Hajizadeh Maimandi, M. Eskandari Fard, M. (2013). The relationship between social trust and social harmony (case study of Yazd city); Iran's Social Issues Quarterly, Vol.4, No.2, pp.54-38https://ensani.ir/file/ download/article/20141211153026-9824-54.pdf. ]in Persian [
Hodges. C. (2020). Basing Action and Structure on Values in a Post-Corona World, oxford Legal Studies Research paper, No.10.
Hosseini, J. (2006). Sociology of social harmony and ethnic minorities in Iran, Mashhad: Sokhongostar. ]in Persian [
Jaberi Ansari, M.H. (1999). History of Isfahan, correction and suspension of Jamshid Mazaheri, Isfahan: Mashaal and Behi. ]in Persian [
Katoozian, M. A [Homayoun]. (2000). Government and society in Iran, translated by Hassan Afshar, Tehran: Center. ]in Persian [
Katoozian, M. A [Homayoun]. (2001). Conflict between the state and the nation: theory of history and politics in Iran, translated by Alireza Tayeb, Tehran: Ney. ] in Persian [
Katum, Richard .(1992). Nationalism in Iran, translated by Ahmad Tedin, Tehran: Ney. ]in Persian [
Lawson. K. (1996). How political parties works presepective from within, Praeger : British library
Massoudnia, H. (2005). Civil society and non-governmental organizations in Iran: challenges and solutions, Journal of Isfahan School of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Vol.17, No.2, Isfahan, pp. 119-137. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/41035. ]in Persian [
Massoudnia, H. (2024). Etemad newspaper, why the cabinet arrangement. Availabale at: https://www.etemadnewspaper.ir/fa/main/detail/220998/. (Assessed22 August 2024). ]in Persian [
Massoudnia, H and et al. (2013). Globalization, internet and national cohesion in Iran: a case study of Isfahan University students, National Studies Quarterly, Vol.4. No.3, pp.171-149 https://ensani.ir/file/ download/article/1646644058-10516-1400-143.pdf. ]In Persian [
Massoudnia, H. (2003). An introduction to the challenges of demolition and its consequences in Iran, Strategy, no.29, Tehran, pp.138-150. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20110102151707-416 pdf. ]in Persian [
Morteji, H. A. (1999). Iran's political factions today, Tehran: Naqsh and Nagar. ]in Persian [
Nik Gohar, A.H. (1994). Basics of Sociology, Tehran: Raizan. ]in Persian [
Pasko. M. Dewil. D. (2012); Incom Inequality and Solidarity, Europe Researech in Social Stratification and Mobility. N.30. pp: 215-432.< https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.06.002>
Pye. L. W. (1966). Aspects of political Development, Boston: Little Brown & Company.
Ritters, G. (2000). Theories of Contemporary Political Sociology, Tehran: Elmi. ]in Persian [
Saie, A. Heydari, M. (2014). A study of the effect of communication action on the institutional consensus of the political elites of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Sociology Quarterly of Social Institutions, Vol.2, No.1. https://ssi.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_1083_75afd9e1d9283ba97f9fdad57dff7e21.pdf. ]in Persian [
Tahmasibizadeh, R. Esmaeili, R. Hachitian, M. (2022). Factors affecting social harmony among ethnic groups living in Shahin Shahr, studied by citizens aged 15 to 65), Iranian Political Sociology Quarterly, Vol.5, No.1, pp.  ]in Persian [
Turner, J. (1999). Concepts and applications of sociology, translated by Mohammad Aziz Bakhtiari and Mohammad Fuladi, Tehran, Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute.  [in Persian [
Ziba Kalam, S. Ghandehari, M. (2021). the effect of gaps and contradictions on the crisis of consensus and The problem of development in Iran, Politics Quarterly, Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science, Vol, No.3, pp.736-715.<DOI:10.22059/jpq.2021.314234.1007709>. ]in Persian[