نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد گروه علوم سیاسی دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
2 دانشجوی دکتری علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The main concern of this article is to explain why the Iranian Constitutional
Revolution, which with its anti despotic nature attracted many Iranian cities around
the country, was not welcomed among the Iranian basically tribal areas of the
Western Zagros Mountain and why the local elites did not supported the new
established constitutional government. In fact there was not a coherence reaction to
this political event in Iran. The authors focus on Simarah area of western Zagros, or
Pishkooh and Poshtkooh as the local Lak and Lor tribes and others used to call it.
Two concepts of nomadic-tribal discourse and urban-constitutional discourse are
used to analyze and thus explain the causes of such lack of support to
constitutionalism. The constitutional discourse was not welcomed, except for
specific cases, by Simarah tribes. This went back to the influence of a political
discourse in which factors such as the love for the king (Shah), across borders living,
and centre fugal tendencies played the main role as contrast to the discourse of
constitutionalism based on the spirit of urbanism, centralization and
authoritarianism.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)