تبیین علل ناکارامدی آسه‌آن در بحران روهینگیا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار دانشکدۀ علوم اداری و اقتصاد دانشگاه اصفهان

چکیده

اگرچه قومیت روهینگیا در میانمار از گذشته‌های دور در معرض تهدیدها و آسیب‌های ناسیونالیسم برمه‌ای و نیز بودیسم افراطی در میانمار بوده‌اند، از سال 2012 تا 2018 موج جدیدی از خشونت‌ها علیه این قومیت مسلمان حادث شد که در نتیجة آن نزدیک به یک میلیون نفر آواره و کشته شدند. انتظار می‌رفت اتحادیة ملل جنوب شرق آسیا (آسه‌آن) به‌عنوان مهم‌ترین نهاد منطقه‌ای در آسیای جنوب شرقی به این نسل‌کشی واکنش مناسب نشان دهد، اما این اتفاق حادث نشد. ازاین‌رو این پرسش مطرح می‌شود که اولاً واکنش آسه‌آن به نسل‌کشی در میانمار چه بوده و ثانیاً چه عواملی در چگونگی عکس‌العمل این اتحادیه مؤثر بوده است؟ فرضیة مقاله که به روش توصیفی- تحلیلی بررسی شده، آن است که عدم تجانس فرهنگی- اجتماعی و نامتشابه بودن ساختار سیاسی کشورهای عضو مهم‌ترین علل واکنش ضعیف آسه‌آن به نسل‌کشی علیه قومیت روهینگیا بوده است. یافته‌ها نشان داد عدم انسجام فرهنگی و اجتماعی و نیز نامتشابه بودن ساختارهای سیاسی می‌تواند در ناکارامدی منطقه‌گرایی‌ها مؤثر باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the Inefficiency of ASEAN in Rohyngia Crisis

نویسنده [English]

  • nozar shafiee
esfahan university
چکیده [English]

Although Rohingya's ethnicity in Myanmar has been Exposed threats and injuries by Burmese nationalism as well as extremist Buddhism in Myanmar since the distant past, But from 2012 to 2018, a new wave of violence against this Muslim nation happened, That's the result nearly a million people were displaced and killed. was expected that the South east Asian Nations Union (ASEAN), as the most important regional institution in Southeast Asia, has responded to this genocide, but this did not happen. Therefore, The question arises: firstly, what is the ASEAN response to the genocide in Myanmar and, secondly, What factors influenced the reaction of this union? The hypothesis of the article, which has been analyzed by descriptive-analytic method, is that the socio-cultural heterogeneity and the non-uniformity of the political structure of the member states are the most important reasons for the weakness of ASEAN's response to genocide against the Rohingya ethnicity. the findings of the paper show that cultural and social incoherence as well as the non-uniformity of political structures can be effective in the ineffectiveness of regionalism.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rohingya Ethnicity
  • Genocide
  • South East Asian Nations Union
  • ASEAN
  • Myanmar

مراجع

  1. الف) فارسی

    1. دفتر مطالعات سیاسی و بین‌المللی (1388). میانمار، تهران: وزارت امور خارجه.
    2. سیف‌زاده، سید حسین (1384). نظریه‌های مختلف در روابط بین‌الملل فـردی- جهـانی‌شده: مناسبت و کارآمدی، تهران: وزارت امور خارجه.

      ب) انگلیسی

     

    1. Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2017). "ASEAN Chairman’s Statement on The Humanitarian Situation in Rakhine State" . September 24, 2017. Available at: https://asean.org/asean-chairmans-statement-on-the-humanitarian-situation-in-rakhine-state/.

     

    1. ASEAN. (2016). "Top ten ASEAN trade partner countries". Available at: http:// asean.org/storage/2016/06/table20_as-of-30-Aug-2016-2.pdf.

     

    1. Bernama. (2017). "Anifah: Malaysia will keep raising plight of Rohingyas at UN, OIC meetings". 6 September 2007, Available at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/anifahmalaysia-will-keep-raising-plight-of-rohingyas-at-un-oicmeetings#LzED4e0yS54h58MA.97.
    2. CBS News. (2017). "Rex Tillerson Says Violence Against Myanmar’s Rohingya Must Stop". September 14, 2017. Available at: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rex-tillerson-myanmar-rohingya-aung-san-suu-kyi/.  
    3. Christopher. R. (2010). ASEAN’s Myanmar Crisis: Challenges to the Pursuit of a Security Community. ISEAS, Singapore, 2010. ISBN: 978-981-4279-24-6.
    4. Clapp. P.A. (2015). "China’s Relations with Burma, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission China’s Relations with Southeast Asia". United States institute of Peace, May 13, 2015, Available at: https://www.usip.org/publications/2015/05/chinas-relations-burma

     

    1. Cole. B. E.; Courtney. A.; Kaster, E.; & Sheinbaum, N. (2017). The US Integrated Reform Mission in Burma 2009 to 2015, United State Institute of Peace, Available at: https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/3D-Lessons-Case-Burma.pdf.

     

    1.  Cantori, L. J.; &  Spiegel. S. L .(1969)."International Relations of Regions: A Comparative Approach to Five Subordinate Systems" , International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 4, Special Issue on International Subsystems. (Dec., 1969), pp. 361-380 , Wiley on behalf of The International Studies Association Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3013600 Accessed: 16-03-2019 05:46 UTC
    2.  Cantori ,L. J.; &  Spiegel .S. L .(1970). “The International Relations of Regions” , Polity, Vol. 2, No. 4 (Summer, 1970), pp. 397-425 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Northeastern Political Science Association Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3233994 Accessed: 16-03-2019 05:44 UTC
    3. François.M.; & Souris.B. (2017). The Plight of the Rohingya in Myanmar Root Causes of the Crisis And Durable Solutions. New Direction - The Foundation for European Reform.  Available at: https://newdirection.online/publication/the-plight-of-the-rohingya-in-myanmar-root-causes-of-the-crisis-and-durable.
    4. Gao.Ch. (2017). "China Aids Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh While Backing Myanmar Government".The Diplomat. October 2, 2017, Available at:  www.thediplomat.com/2017/10/china-aids-rohingya-refugees-in-bangladesh-while -backing-myanmar-government/.

     

    1. Global Times. (2017). "Is Suu Kyi to blame for Rakhine violence?". Global Times September 10, 2017, Available at: www.globaltimes.cn/content /1065761.shtml/.
    2. Halim. H.  (2017). "Jokowi, Suu Kyi discuss Rohingya crisis". The Jakarta Post . 6 May 2017. Available at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2017/04/29/jokowi-suukyi-discuss-rohingya-crisis.html.
    3. Hamdan. M.A. (2017). ".Rohingya crisis: Little can be done if Myanmar remains in denial – Anifah". Astwo Awani 25 Septermber. viewed 29 November.Available at:  http://english.astroawani.com/malaysia-news/rohingya-crisis-little-can-be-done-ifmyanmar-remains-denial-anifah-156172.
    4. Haacke. J. (2015)".The United States and Myanmar: From Antagonists to Security Partners?".Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs.2/2015, (34) 2, 55–83. Available at: https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jsaa/article/view/873.
    5. Haacke. J. (2006) .Myanmar’s Foreign Policy: Domestic influences and international implications. UK, Routledge, Adelphi Paper 381. ISBN 9780415407267. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/24574/.
    6. Jati. I. (2017). "Comparative study of the roles of ASEAN and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation in responding to the Rohingya crisis". The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 1(a), pp. 17-32, Available at:  https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ikat/article/view/27466/16821.
    7. Kabir. Sh & Salim. R. (2013)." Regional Economic Integration in ASEAN: How far Willthey Go?" .Journal of South East Asian Economics 31, (2) 313-35, Available at: : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265708359.
    8. Lee. R. (2017). "Rohingya Crisis: ASEAN’s problems go beyond religious rift. IAPS Dialogue". 13 October 2017, Available at: https://iapsdialogue.org/2017/10/02/rohingya-crisisaseans-problems-go-beyond-a-religious-rift/.
    9. Lego. J. (2017). "ASEAN dangerously silent on Rohingya crisis". Asia Times, 18 May. Accessed: 10 October. Available at:  http://www.atimes.com/article/asean-dangerously-silent-rohingya-crisis/.
    10. Li. Ch. (2012)."China-Myanmar Comprehensive Strategic Cooperative Partnership: A Regional Threat?". Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. January 2012. 31(1), pp. 53-72. Available at: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/doaj/18681034/2012/00000031/00000001/art00004?crawler=true.
    11. Martin. M.F. & Margesson, R. & Vaughn, B. (2017). The Rohingya Crises in Bangladesh and Burma. Congressional Research Service Report. 7-5700, November 8, 2017.Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R45016.pdf.
    12. Myoe. M.A. (2011). “In the name of Pauk-Phaw- Myanmar’s China policy since 1948”, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, 2011, pp. 156. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maung_Myoe/publication/272092749_In_the_Name_of_Pauk-Phaw/links/54dac63d0cf261ce15cdf6bd/In-the-Name-of-Pauk-Phaw.pdf.
    13. Poling. G.B. (2014). Separating Fact from Fiction about Myanmar’s Rohingya. Center for Strategic and International Studies(CSIS). February 13, 2014. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/separating-fact-fiction-about-myanmar%E2%80%99s-rohingya.
    14. Ramzy. A. (2017). "Rohingya Refugees Fleeing Myanmar Await Entrance to Squalid Camps". New York Times. October 18, 2017. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/18/world/asia/rohingya-refugees-myanmar.html.
    15. Republic of the Union of Myanmar. (2015). The  Population and Housing Census of Myanmar. unfpa 2(48).  May 2015. Available at: https://myanmar.unfpa.org/en/publications/union-report-Vol. 2-main-census-report.
    16. Reuters (2016). "Malaysian PM urges intervention to stop ‘genocide’ of Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslims", reuters ,Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-myanmarrohingya-malaysia/malaysian-pm-urges-intervention-to-stop-genocide-of-myanmarsrohingya-muslims-idUSKBN13T07I.
    17. Ryu. Y. (2008). ."The Asian Financial Crisis and ASEAN’s Concept of Security". RSIS Working Paper, No. 148. Singapore: Nanyang Technological UniversityAvailable at: https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/rsis-pubs/WP148.pdf. 
    18. Singh, B. (2014). “ASEAN, Myanmar and the Rohingya Issue”,Indonisian Journal of Southeast Studies, 18(1-2), January-June 2014, ISSN 0971-9318. Available at: www.himalayanresearch.org/pdf/Vol18%20Nos1-2,%20January-June%202014.pdf.

     

    1. Subedi. D.B. (2017). ."Myanmar’s ‘Rohingya Issue’ is a regional refugee crisis – ASEAN must intervene". The World Post. 17 March.Accessed: 9 October 2017. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/myanmars-rohingya-issue-is-a-regional-refugeecrisis_us_58cc01ece4b07112b6472cd1.
    2. Selth, A. (2007)." Burma, China and the Myths of Military Base", Asian Security. 3(3), 06 Sep 2007. 279-307. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14799850701568929.
    3. State Department, “Accountability for Human Rights Abuses in Rakhine State, Burma,” press release, October 23, 2017.  Available at: https://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2017/10/275021 .  
    4.  Shiang. H. Y. (2013) . Myanmar Political Reform: Impact to The Political Economy Relation with China. September 2013. Asia-Europe Institute, Kuala Lumpur , DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19147.08484, Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326413967_MYANMAR_POLITICAL_REFORM_IMPACT_TO_THE_POLITICAL_ECONOMY_RELATION_WITH_CHINA_POLITICAL_ECONOMY_RELATION_WITH_CHINA/download.
    5. Tun. Z. (2017)."Myanmar’s Rohingya issue’ is a regional refugee crisis – ASEAN must intervene". The Conversation. 17 March. Available at: https://theconversation.com/myanmars-rohingya-issue-is-a-regional-refugee-crisis-aseanmust-intervene-70849.
    6. U.S. Mission to the United Nations. (2017). Remarks at a UN Security Council Briefing on the Situation in Burma. Ambassador Nikki Haley. press release. September 28, 2017.  Available at: https://usun.state.gov/remarks/7998.
    7. U.S. Embassy in Rangoon. (2017). "Statement on the Diplomatic Trip to Northern Rakhine on 2 October 2017". press release. October 2, 2017. or see: Delegation of the European Union to Myanmar. .Statement on the Diplomatic Trip to Northern Rakhine on 2 October 2017. Yangon 2 OCTOBER 2017. UNIQUE ID: 171002_9, Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/myanmar-burma_en/33143/STATEMENT%20ON%20THE%20DIPLOMATIC%20TRIP%20TO%20NORTHERN%20RAKHINE%20ON%202%20OCTOBER%202017. 
    8. Vinh. V.W. (2014). "Asean’s Approach to Myanmar". Himalayan and Central Asian Studies. 18(1-2), January-June 2014. Available at: www.himalayanresearch.org/pdf/Vol18%20Nos1-2,%20January-June%202014.pdf.
    9. Weng. Y.P. (2017). "Rohingya crisis at a crucial point for Myanmar’s leaders". global-is-asian. 28 September. viewed 11 October, Available at: https://global-is-asian.nus.edu.sg/index.php/rohingyacrisis-crucial-point-myanmars-leaders/.
    10. World trade organization. (2017).World Trade Statistical Review. Available at:

    https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2017_e/wts17_toc_e.htm

    1. Yin, K.M. (2005). "Salience of Ethnicity among Burman Muslims: A Study in Identity Formation". Intellectual Discourse, 13(2), 161-179. Available at: file:///C:/Users/h/Downloads/Documents/108-Article%20Text-175-1-10-20100127.pdf.
    2. Yunus, A. (2017). "Anifah takes centre stage at UN; calls on Myanmar to halt Rohingya persecution". New Straits Times. 23 September. Accessed 13 October 2017,  Available at: https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2017/09/283024/anifah-takes-centre-stage-un-callsmyanmar-halt-rohingya-persecution.
فصلنامه سیاست
دوره 50، شماره 4
دی 1399
صفحه 1189-1210

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 19 آذر 1397
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 07 اسفند 1397
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 07 اسفند 1397
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 دی 1399

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار