نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Alliance strategies are considered as part of the grand strategy of each state. These strategies represent different ways of political interactions of a state with other international actors in order to safeguard and promote its national interests. As a result, alliances are one of the most important features of international politics and play an influential role in the foreign policy decision-making of any state. The origin and theoretical basis of alliance theories can be found in the literature on realism and realist theories of international relations. The realist theories, regardless of the power differences between the states, consider them as similar units and similar actors which are security seekers (defensive realism) or power seekers (offensive realism). Thus, no distinction is made between different types of alliance strategies of different states in the international system. The main purpose of this paper is to compare different types of alliance strategies of the states in the international system in a manner conforming with their relative power and position in the world system.
The primary research question is that, “what are the most important points of difference and similarities between the alliance strategies of states?” In the research hypothesis, the author claims that the relative power position of states will influence the types of alliance strategies which they formulate and adopt. For hypothesis-testing, qualitative data are collected for a comparative analysis of the theoretical assumptions, viewpoints and research findings presented by the prominent theorists in this field. Using the method of conceptual analysis of data, the author attempts to answer
the research question. The comparative method is useful because it increases the researcher’s understanding of different political systems or political phenomena and prevents undue generalizations in the research. In this method, a political phenomenon is compared in different countries or institutions, and therefore it is different from the case study method. By comparing the alliance strategies of superpowers, great powers, middle powers and small states, the author finds that there are the greatest similarities between the alliance strategies of two sets of states: a) the satisfied great powers and the satisfied middle powers; b) the dissatisfied great powers and dissatisfied middle powers.
In the discussion of the conceptual framework, the unequal structure of power distribution in the international system and the positional rank of each state in this system are discussed. Then, the existing power structure in the international system are examined. One of the important features of the structure of the current international system that should be taken into account is the unequal distribution of power among states, which has led to the classification of states into superpowers, great powers, middle or secondary powers, regional powers, and small states. In the theoretical literature in this field, it can be seen that superpowers and great powers are system-determining states. In sum, some key findings of the research are as follows: 1. The difference in the states’ relative power and positional rank in the international system is the most significant explanatory variable in the adoption of different alliance strategies by all types of states. 2. In the alliance strategies of the middle powers, the structure of the region and the type of patterns governing the region in which the middle powers are located are very important. 3. The power structure of the international system (e.g., the polarity of the system) is an important variable for determining the types of alliance strategies of each state. In the unipolar structure, for instance, the issue of which state is the superpower or what policies it follows will greatly affect types of alliance strategies of other states.
کلیدواژهها [English]
References
16.Hersij, H. (2008). "Ravesh-e moghāyes’ī: chisti, cherāi and chegonegi-ye be'kārgiri-ye ān dar oloom-e siyāsi, Comparative Method: What it is, Why and How to Use it in Political Science," Faslnāmeh-ye oloom-e edārī and eghtesādī, Quarterly Journal of Administrative and Economic Science, 13, 1: 7-17. Available at: https://ensani.ir/fa/article/291105 (Accessed 5 July 2023). [In Persian]
29.Rasooli Saniabadi, E. (2022). “Anvāe rāhbord’hā-ye movāzeneh’garāyāneh dar nezām-e tak-ghotbi (Types of Balancing Strategies in the Unipolar Order),” Faslnāmeh-ye siyāsat (Politics Quarterly) 53, 2: 451-425, <DOI:10.22059/jpq.2023.346486. 1007981>. [In Persian]
31.Rasooli Saniabadi, E. (2014). “Māhiyat-e etehād’hā dar khāvar-e miyāneh: ghodrat and yā hoveiyat (The Nature of Alliances in Middle East: Power or Identity?” Faslnāmeh-ye motāleāt-e rāhbordi, Journal of Strategic Studies 17, 3: 171-196. Available at: https://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_10039. Html (Accessed 5 July 2023). [In Persian]
)